Mainstream research on racial essentialization may be valuable in the fight against racism, as Held (2020) suggested. I argue that the production of scientific racism in the literature of psychology is unlikely to be affected by such research. Assertions by psychologists of Black people’s average inferiority in brain size, intelligence, and morality have persisted for over 100 years despite repeated, careful critiques. Recent presentations of these old and discredited claims have sidestepped the fundamental criticism that they rest on essentialized racial categories. The survival of scientific racism in mainstream psychology journals should be understood as a community project with its own Weltanschauung of “racial progress.”
American Association of Physical Anthropologists. (1996). AAPA statement on biological aspects of race. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 101(4), 569–570. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1331010408
BraceC. L. (2005). “Race” is a four letter word. Oxford University Press.
4.
FishJ. M. (Ed.). (2002). Race and intelligence: Separating science from myth. Erlbaum.
5.
FujimuraJ. H.BolnickD. A.RajagoopalanR.KaufmanJ. S.LewontinR. C.DusterTOssorioP.MarksJ. (2014). Clines without classes: How to make sense of human variation. Sociological Theory, 32(3), 208–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275114551611
6.
GravesJ. L. (2001). The emperor’s new clothes: Biological theories of race at the millennium. Rutgers University Press.
7.
HeldB. S. (2020). Epistemic violence in psychological science: Can knowledge of, from, and for the (othered) people solve the problem?Theory & Psychology, 30(3), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319883943
8.
JacksonJ. P. (2005). Science for segregation: Race, law, and the case against Brown v. Board of Education. New York University Press.
9.
JensenA. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Praeger.
10.
JensenA. R. (2013). Rushton’s contributions to the study of mental ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(3), 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.008
LiebermanL. (2001). How Caucasoids got such big crania and how they shrank: From Morton to Rushton. Current Anthropology, 42(1), 69–95.
13.
LivingstoneF. B. (1962). On the non-existence of human races. Current Anthropology, 3(3), 279–281. https://doi.org/10.1086/200290
14.
LynnR. (2013). Rushton’s r–k life history theory of race differences in penis length and circumference examined in 113 populations. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(3), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.02.016
15.
LynnR.VanhanenT. (2002). IQ and the wealth of nations. Praeger.
16.
NisbettR. (2009). Intelligence and how to get it: Why schools and cultures count. Norton.
17.
NyborgH. (2012). The decay of Western civilization: Double relaxed Darwinian selection. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(2), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.031
PetersM. (1995). Does brain size matter? A reply to Rushton and Ankney. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49(4), 570–576. https://doi.org/10.1037/1196-1961.49.4.570
20.
RichardsG. (2012). “Race,” racism and psychology: Toward a reflexive history (2nd. ed.). Routledge.
21.
RindermannH. (2013). African cognitive ability: Research, results, divergences and recommendations. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(3), 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.022
22.
RindermannH. (2018). Cognitive capitalism: Human capital and the wellbeing of nations. Cambridge University Press.
23.
RosenbergN. A.MahajanS.RamachandranS.ZhaoC.PritchardJ. K.FeldmanM. W. (2005, December9). Clines, clusters, and the effect of study design on the inference of human population structure. PLOS Genetics, 1(6), Article e70. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0010070
24.
RushtonJ. P. (1995). Race, evolution, and behavior: A life history perspective. Transaction.
25.
RushtonJ. P.BogaertA. F. (1989). Population differences in susceptibility to AIDS: An evolutionary analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 28(12), 1211–1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(89)90339-0
26.
RushtonJ. P.JensenA. R. (2005). Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(3), 235–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.3.406
27.
SussmanR. W. (2014). The myth of race: The troubling persistence of an unscientific idea. Harvard University Press.
28.
TempletonA. R. (2013). Biological races in humans. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences44(3), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.04.010
29.
TeoT. (2008). From speculation to epistemological violence in psychology: A critical-hermeneutic reconstruction. Theory & Psychology, 18(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354307086922
30.
TeoT. (2013). Sciences of the living dead: Race, psychology, and epistemic pollution. In MarvakisA.MotzkauJ.PainterD.Ruto-KorirR.SullivanG.TrilivaS.WieserM. (Eds.), Doing psychology under new conditions (pp. 122–130). Captus.
31.
TuckerW. H. (1994). The science and politics of racial research. University of Illinois Press.
32.
TuckerW. H. (2002). The funding of scientific racism: Wickliffe Draper and the pioneer fund. University of Illinois Press.
33.
WeizmannF. (2004). Type and essence: Prologue to the history of psychology and race. In WinstonA. S. (Ed.), Defining difference: Race and racism in the history of psychology (pp. 21–47). American Psychological Association.
34.
WeizmannF.WeinerN. I.WiesenthalD. L.ZieglerM. (1990). Differential K theory and racial hierarchies. Canadian Psychology, 31(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078934
35.
WinegardB.WinegardB.AnomalyJ. (2020). Dodging Darwin: Race, evolution, and the hereditarian hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 160(1), Article 109915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109915
WinstonA. S. (2018). Neoliberalism and IQ: Naturalizing economic and racial inequality. Theory & Psychology, 28(5), 600–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318798160
38.
WinstonA. S. (2020). Scientific racism and North American psychology. In BraddickO. (Ed.), The Oxford research encyclopedia of psychology. Oxford University Press.
YeeA. H.FairchildH. H.WeizmannF.WyattG. E. (1993). Addressing psychology’s problem with race. American Psychologist, 48(11), 1132–1140. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.11.1132
