This comment responds to Held’s (2020) analyses of Indigenous and critical psychologies, not by providing line-for-line refutations of arguments, but by laying out some of the larger issues in those areas of research and practice. The argument clarifies assumptions and misunderstandings by looking at the relationship between critical and Indigenous psychologies, power and violence, objectivity, and the regulative role of prepositions. It is hoped that a clearer and broader understanding of those psychologies can emerge.
AdamsG.Estrada-VillaltaS. (2017). Theory from the South: A decolonial approach to the psychology of global inequality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 37–42. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.031
2.
BhatiaS. (2018). Decolonizing psychology: Globalization, social justice, and Indian youth identities. Oxford University Press.
3.
ChristopherJ. C.WendtD. C.MarecekJ.GoodmanD. M. (2014). Critical cultural awareness: Contributions to a globalizing psychology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 645–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036851
4.
CoulthardG. S. (2014). Red skin, white masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. University of Minneapolis Press.
5.
DastonL.GalisonP. (2007). Objectivity. Zone.
6.
EnriquezV. G. (1992). From colonial to liberation psychology: The Philippine experience. University of the Philippines Press.
7.
GoneJ. P. (2017). “It felt like violence”: Indigenous knowledge traditions and the postcolonial ethics of academic inquiry and community engagement. American Journal of Community Psychology, 60(3–4), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12183
8.
HeldB. S. (2020). Epistemic violence in psychological science: Can knowledge of, from, and for the (othered) people solve the problem?Theory & Psychology, 30(3), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319883943
9.
HolzkampK. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie [Laying the foundations for psychology]. Campus.
10.
Martin-BaroI. (1994). Writings for a liberation psychology. Harvard University Press.
11.
SpivakG. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In NelsonC.GrossbergL. (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
12.
TeoT. (2008). From speculation to epistemological violence in psychology: A critical-hermeneutic reconstruction. Theory & Psychology, 18(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354307086922
TeoT. (2018). Outline of theoretical psychology: Critical investigations. Palgrave.
15.
TolmanC. W. (2009). Holzkamp’s critical psychology as a science from the standpoint of the human subject. Theory & Psychology, 19(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309103535
16.
TorreM. E. (2014). Participatory action research. In TeoT. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 1323–1327). Springer.
Tuhiwai SmithL. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books.
19.
WendtD. C.GoneJ. P. (2012). Decolonizing psychological inquiry in American Indian communities: The promise of qualitative methods. In NagataD. K.Kohn-WoodL.SuzukiL. (Eds.), Qualitative strategies for ethnocultural research (pp. 161–178). American Psychological Association.
