Over the last decade, positive psychology has reified happiness as the key to achieving an understanding of human psychological experience and development. According to positive psychology, happiness can be understood as a measurable object of self-cultivation and psychological enhancement. This conceptualization has provoked multiple critiques, focusing on the power effects invested in these psychological discourses, with a special emphasis on the governmentality practices they exercise on subjectivity formation, in the context of neoliberal capitalism. Less attention has been paid to the ways in which specific technologies, derived from this “turn to happiness,” have had an influence on subjects’ bodies and embodied experiences beyond discursive means. In this article, we borrow insights from affect studies to contribute to and expand the critique of positive psychology. We do this by analyzing a positive psychology-based app called “Happify.” Our analysis consists of identifying and describing three mechanisms through which this technology modulates the capacities of human bodies by producing preemptive habits that result in what we call the positive psychology regime of happiness.
AhmedS. (2010). The promise of happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
2.
AndersonB. (2010). Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 34, 777–798.
3.
BeckerD.MarecekJ. (2008a). Dreaming the American dream: Individualism and positive psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1767–1780.
4.
BeckerD.MarecekJ. (2008b). Positive psychology: History in the remaking?Theory & Psychology, 18, 591–604.
5.
BéjarH. (2011). Cultura psicoterapéutica y autoayuda: el código psicológico-positivo [Psychotherapeutic culture and self-help: The positive-psychological code]. Papers: revista desociologia, 96(2), 341–360.
6.
Ben-ShaharT. (2007). Happier: Learn the secrets to daily joy and lasting fulfillment. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
7.
BerlantL. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
8.
BinkleyS. (2011a). Happiness, positive psychology and the program of neoliberal governmentality. Subjectivity, 4(4), 371–394.
9.
BinkleyS. (2011b). Psychological life as enterprise: Social practice and the government of neo-liberal interiority. History of the Human Sciences, 24(3), 83–102.
10.
BinkleyS. (2014). Happiness as enterprise. An essay on neoliberal life. New York: SUNY Press.
11.
BinkleyS. (2018). The work of happiness: A response to De La Fabián and Stecher (2017). Theory & Psychology, 28, 405–410. doi: 10.1177/0959354318761210
12.
BlackmanL.VennC. (2010). Affect. Body & Society, 16(1), 7–28.
13.
BrownS.ReaveyP. (2015). Vital memory and affect: Living with a difficult past. Hove, UK: Routledge.
14.
CabanasE.HuertasJ. A. (2014). Positive psychology and self-help popular psychology: A historical, psychological and cultural romance. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 30(3), 852–864.
15.
ChristopherJ.HickinbottomS. (2008). Positive psychology, ethnocentrism, and the disguised ideology of individualism. Theory & Psychology, 18, 563–589.
16.
CloughP. (2009). The new empiricism: Affect and sociological method. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 43–61.
17.
CloughP. (2018). The user unconscious: On affect, media, and measure. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18.
CloughP.HalleyJ. (2007). The affective turn. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19.
CloughP.WillseC. (2011). Beyond biopolitics: Essays on governance of life and death. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
20.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
21.
CrombyJ. (2011). The greatest gift? Happiness, governance and psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(11), 840–852.
CrombyJ.WillisM. E. H. (2016). Affect—or feeling (after Leys). Theory & Psychology, 26, 476–495. doi: 10.1177/0959354316651344
24.
DanzigerK. (1979). The social origins of modern psychology: Positivist sociology and the sociology of knowledge. In BussA. R. (Ed.), Psychology in social context: Towards a sociology of psychological knowledge (pp. 27–45). New York, NY: Irvington.
25.
DaviesW. (2015). The happiness industry: How the government and big business sold us well-being. London, UK: Verso Books.
26.
De la FabiánR.StecherA. (2017). Positive psychology’s promise of happiness: A new form of human capital in contemporary neoliberal governmentality. Theory & Psychology, 27, 600–621. doi: 10.1177/0959354317718970
27.
DeleuzeG. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7.
28.
DonaldsonS. I.CsikszentmihalyiM.NakamuraJ. (Eds.). (2011). Applied positive psychology: Improving everyday life, health, schools, work, and society. New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
EhrenreichB. (2009). Bright sided: How the relentless promotion of positive thinking has undermined America. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
30.
EhrenreichB. (2010). Smile or die: How positive thinking fooled America & the world. London, UK: Granta Books.
31.
EllisD.TuckerI. (2015). Social psychology of emotions. London, UK: Sage.
32.
EllisD.TuckerI.HarperD. (2013). The affective atmospheres of surveillance. Theory & Psychology, 23, 716–731.
33.
FrawleyA. (2015). Happiness research: A review of critiques. Sociology Compass, 9(1), 62–77.
34.
GrecoM.StennerP. (2013). Happiness and the art of life: Diagnosing the psychopolitics of wellbeing. Health, Culture and Society, 5(1), 1–19.
35.
GreggM.SeigworthG. J. (Eds.). (2010). The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
36.
HansenM. B. N. (2015). Feed-forward: On the future of twenty-first-century media. London, UK: The University of Chicago Press.
LaraA.LiuW.Patrick AshleyC.NishidaA.LiebertR.BilliesM. (2017). Affect and subjectivity. Subjectivity, 10, 30–43.
44.
LazarusR. S. (2003). Does the positive psychology movement have legs?Psychological Inquiry, 14(2), 93–109.
45.
LazzaratoM. (2006). Políticas del acontecimiento [The politics of event]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Tinta Limón.
46.
Martínez-GuzmánA.Medina CárdenasO. (2016). La felicidad como tecnología de gobierno en el context neoliberal: Una exploración de los discursos felicitarios en tres ámbitos [Happiness as a governmental technology in the neoliberal context: Exploring happiness discourses in three areas]. Revista Somepso, 1(2), 61–91.
47.
MassumiB. (2007). Potential politics and the primacy of preemption. Theory and Event, 10(2). doi: 10.1353/tae.2007.0066
48.
MassumiB. (2015). Politics of affect. Malden, MA: Polity.
49.
McGeeM. (2006). Self-help inc.: Makeover culture in American life. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50.
McMahonD. M. (2006). Happiness: A history. New York, NY: Grove Press.
51.
MillerA. (2008). A critique of positive psychology—or “the new science of happiness”. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42, 3–4.
52.
MongrainM.Anselmo-MatthewsT. (2012). Do positive psychology exercises work? A replication of Seligman et al. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68, 382–389.
53.
MoskowitzE. (2001). In therapy we trust: America’s obsession with self-fulfillment. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
54.
NailT. (2016). Biopower and control. In MorarN.NailT.SmithD. (Eds.), Between Deleuze and Foucault (pp. 247–263). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
55.
NehringD.AlvaradoE.HendriksE. C.KerriganD. (2016). Transnational popular psychology and the global self-help industry: The politics of contemporary social change. London, UK: Springer.
56.
PapacharissiZ. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
57.
PapaliniV. (2006). Literatura de autoayuda: una subjetividad del Sí-Mismo enajenado [Self-help literature: A subjectivity of the alienated self]. La trama de la Communicaión, 11, 331–342.
58.
PapaliniV. A. (2010). Libros de autoayuda: Biblioterapia para la felicidad [Self-help books: Bibliotherapy for happiness]. Athena Digital. Revisita de pensamiento e investigación social, 19, 147–169.
59.
ParisiL.GoodmanS. (2011). Mnemonic control. In CloughP. T.WillseC. (Eds.), Beyond biopolitics: Essays on the governance of life and death (pp. 163–176). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
60.
ParkerI. (2007). Revolution in psychology: Alienation to emancipation. London, UK: Pluto Press.
61.
ProteviJ. (2009). Political affect: Connecting the social and the somatic. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
62.
RoseN. (1985). The psychological complex: Psychology, politics and society in England, 1869–1939. London, UK: Routledge.
63.
RoseN. (1990). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London, UK: Taylor & Frances/Routledge.
64.
RoseN. (1998). Inventing ourselves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
SeligmanM. (2000). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York, NY: Free Press.
68.
SeligmanM. (2002). Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. In SnyderC. R.LopezS. J. (Eds.), The handbook of positive psychology (pp. 3–12). New York, NY: Oxford Press.
69.
SeligmanM. (2012). Flourishing: A visionary new understanding of happiness and wellbeing. New York, NY: Free Press.
70.
SeligmanM.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.
71.
SlifeB. D.RichardsonF. C. (2008). Problematic ontological underpinnings of positive psychology: A strong relational alternative. Theory & Psychology, 18, 699–723.
72.
StennerP. (2018). Liminality and experience: A transdisciplinary approach to the psychosocial. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
73.
WetherellM. (2015). Trends in the turn to affect: A social psychological critique. Body & Society, 21(2), 139–166.
74.
WilsonE. (2008). Against happiness: In praise of melancholy. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
75.
YenJ. (2010). Authorizing happiness: Rhetorical demarcation of science and society in historical narratives of positive psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 30(2), 67–78.
76.
ZevnikL. (2014). Critical perspectives in happiness research: The birth of modern happiness. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
