Within a semiotic and psychodynamic frame, we present and discuss the psychological construct of modal articulation. By modality, we mean the way a subject organizes the meaning of his/her own experience according to categories of necessity, possibility, opportunity, will, knowledge, permission, and duty. Modality is a relevant topic in some branches of philosophy, logics, linguistics, and semiotics, but there is no systematic discourse about it in psychology. The proposal of this work is to deal with some interesting and promising features of modal categories in the sensemaking process of subjective experience. Modalization is presented as a relevant semiotic organization in each contextual and dynamic sensemaking process in order to perform three functions: (a) connection between affective matrix and subjective experience, (b) mediation between subjective positioning in intersubjective context, and (c) vectorialization of action, namely orienting subjective agency in becoming temporal. Theoretical, methodological, and clinical implications are discussed.
BainsP. (2006). The primacy of semiosis: An ontology of relations. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
2.
BakhtinM. M. (1981). The dialogical imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
3.
BertrandD. (2007). Basi di semiotica letteraria [Basics of literary semiotics]. Milano, Italy: Meltemi.
4.
BionW. R. (1962). Learning from experience. London, UK: William Heinemann.
5.
BionW. R. (1989). Learning from experience. London, UK: Falmer.
6.
BrancoA.ValsinerJ. (2010). Towards cultural psychology of affective processes: Semiotic regulation of dynamic fields. Estudios de Psicología, 31(3), 243–251.
BrockmeierJ. (2009). Reaching for meaning: Human agency and the narrative imagination. Theory & Psychology, 19, 213–233.
9.
BrunerJ. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BucciW. (1997). Psychoanalysis and cognitive science: A multiple code theory. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
CastonJ. (2011). Agency as a psychoanalytic idea. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 59, 907–938. doi: 10.1177/0003065111422541
12.
CoquetJ.-C. (2005). Soggettività e Modalità [Subjectivity and modality]. In BettetiniG.CalabreseO.LorussoA. M.VioliP.VolliU. (Eds.), Semiotica (pp. 207–218). Milano, Italy: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
13.
CorraoF. (1998). Orme II: Contributi alla psicoanalisi di gruppo [Footprints II: Contributions to group psychoanalysis]. Milano, Italy: Cortina.
14.
DamasioA. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
15.
De Luca PicioneR. (2015a). The idiographic approach in psychological research: The challenge of overcoming old distinctions without risking to homogenize. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(3), 360–370. doi: 10.1007/s12124-015-9307-5
16.
De Luca PicioneR. (2015b). La mente come forma. La mente come testo: Un’indagine semiotico-psicologica dei processi di significazione [The mind as form. The mind as text: A semiotic-psychological research of sensemaking research]. Milano, Italy: Mimesis Edizioni.
17.
De Luca PicioneR.DicéF.FredaM. F. (2015). La comprensione della diagnosi di DSD da parte delle madri: Uno studio sui processi di sensemaking attraverso una prospettiva semiotico-psicologica [The understanding of DSD diagnosis by mother: A study about processes of sense-making of the disease through a semiotic-psychological perspective]. Rivista di Psicologia della Salute, 2, 47–75. doi: 10.3280/PDS2015-002004
18.
De Luca PicioneR.FredaM. F. (2014). Catalysis and morphogenesis: The contextual semiotic configuration of form, function, and fields of experience. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, 11, 149–163. New York, NY: Springer.
19.
De Luca PicioneR.FredaM. F. (2016a). Borders and modal articulations: Semiotic constructs of sensemaking processes enabling a fecund dialogue between cultural psychology and clinical psychology. Journal of Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50, 29–43. doi: 10.1007/s12124-015-9318-2
20.
De Luca PicioneR.FredaM. F. (2016b). The processes of meaning making, starting from the morphogenetic theories of René Thom. Culture and Psychology, 22(1), 139–157. doi: 10.1177/1354067X15576171
21.
De Luca PicioneR.FredaM. F. (2016c). Possible use in psychology of threshold concept in order to study sensemaking processes. Culture & Psychology, 22(3), 362–375. doi: 1354067X16654858
22.
De Luca PicioneR.MartinoM. L.FredaM. F. (2017). Understanding cancer patients’ narratives: Meaning-making process, temporality and modalities. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 30(4), 339–359. doi: 10.1080/10720537.2016.1227738
23.
De Luca PicioneR.ValsinerJ. (2017). Psychological functions of semiotic borders in sense-making: Liminality of narrative processes. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 13(3), 532–547 doi: 10.5964/ejop.v13i3.1136
24.
DicéF.SantanielloA.GerardiF.MennaL. F.FredaM. F. (2017). Meeting the emotion! Application of the Federico II model for pet therapy to an experience of Animal Assisted Education (AAE) in a primary school. Practiques Psychologiques. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.prps.2017.03.001
25.
DicéF.ZoenaF. (2017). Loneliness and family burden: An exploratory investigation on the emotional experiences of caregivers of patients with severe mental illness. The Qualitative Report, 22, 1781–1791. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol22/iss7/4
26.
DoleželL. (1976). Narrative modalities. Journal of Literary Semantics, 5, 5–14.
27.
DoleželL. (1998). Heterocosmica: Fiction and possible worlds. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28.
EspositoG.FredaM. F.De Luca PicioneR. (2016). Reflexivity or “Reflexivities” in higher education: Conceptualizing unique reflexive process. In FredaM. F.Gonzàlez-MonteagudoJ.EspositoG. (Eds.), Working with underachieving students in higher education: Fostering inclusion through narration and reflexivity (pp. 32–42). New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
EspositoG.RibeiroA. P.AlvesD.GonçalvesM. M.FredaM. F. (2017). Meaning coconstruction in group counseling: The development of innovative moments. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 30, 404–426. doi: 10.1080/10720537.2016.1238789
30.
FornariF. (1981). Il codice vivente [The living code]. Torino, Italy: Bollati Boringhieri.
31.
FredaM. F.De Luca PicioneR.Di StazioF. (2012, September). L’articolazione modale come indicazione del rapporto tra soggettività e relazionalità [Modal articulation as indicator of subjectivity-relationality]. Paper presented at IX Congresso Nazionale sulla Ricerca in Psicoterapia, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Fisciano, Italy.
32.
FredaM. F.SavareseL.BovaM.GalanteA.De FalcoR.De Luca PicioneR.… TriggianiM. (2016). Stress and psychological factors in the variable clinical phenotype of hereditary angioedema in children: A pilot study. Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonology, 29, 6–12.
33.
FreudS. (1914). Remembering, repeating and working-through (Further recommendations on the technique of psycho-analysis II). In StracheyJ. P. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. 12 (pp. 145–156). London, UK: The Hogarth Press.
34.
GargiuloA.PlenerP. L.BausN.MargheritaG.BrunnerR.Kaes KapustaN. (2014). Autolesività non suicidaria (NSSI) e Disturbo da Comportamento Suicidario (SBD) nella recente pubblicazione del DSM-5. Minerva Psichiatrica, 55, 83–90.
35.
GreenA. (1973). Le discours vivant: La conception psychanalytique de l’affect [Living discourse: The psychoanalytic conception of affects]. Paris, France: Presses universitaires de France.
36.
GreimasA. J. (1983). De la modalisation de l’être. Dusens II. [On the modalitazation of the being. The sense II]. Paris, France: Seuil.
37.
GreimasA. J.FontanilleJ. (1993). The semiotics of passions: From states of affairs to states of feelings. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
38.
Håkonsen MartinsenE.Helge SolbakkJ. (2012). Illness as a condition of our existence in the world: On illness and pathic existence. Medical Humanities, 38(1), 44–49. doi:10.1136/medhum-2011-010108
39.
HarréR. (1959). Modal expressions in ordinary and technical language. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 37(1), 41–56.
HarréR.van LangenhoveL. (1991). Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21, 393–407.
42.
HermansH. J. M. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7, 243–281.
43.
JanzD. (2011). On the pathic pentagram of Viktor von Weizsacker as a practical guideline in the relationship between doctor and patient. Teoria – Rivista Di Filosofia, 31, 93–101.
44.
KantI. (1998). Critique of pure reason (GuyerP.WoodA. W., Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1787)
45.
KullK. (2009). Vegetative, animal, and cultural semiosis: The semiotic threshold zones. Cognitive Semiotics, 4(supp.), 8–27.
46.
LanzilloR.ChiodiA.CarotenutoV.MagriA.NapolitanoR.LiuzziT.CostabileN. (2016). Quality of life and cognitive functions in early onset multiple sclerosis. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, 20(1), 158–163. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2015.08.005
47.
LewinK. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
48.
LinskyL. (1971). Reference and modality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49.
LotmanJ. (2005). On the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies, 33, 205–229.
50.
MarkováI. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
MarsicoG. (2011). The “non-cuttable” space in between: Context, boundaries and their natural fluidity. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 45, 185–193.
52.
MarsicoG.ChaudharyN.ValsinerJ.LyberthM. (2015). Maintenance of family networks: Centrality of peripheral communication. Psychological Studies, 60, 185–192.
53.
MartinJ.GillespieA. (2010). A neo-Median approach to human agency: Relating the social and the psychological in the ontogenesis of perspective-coordinating persons. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44(3), 252–272.
54.
MartinoM. L.De Luca PicioneR. (2016). Illness narratives and modal articulation: An innovative methodological and clinical proposal. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 4(2, supp.), 62–64.
55.
MartinoM. L.FredaM. F. (2016a). Meaning-making process related to temporality during breast cancer traumatic experience: The clinical use of narrative to promote a new continuity of life. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12, 622–634, doi: 10.5964/ejop.v12i4.1150
56.
MartinoM. L.FredaM. F. (2016b). Post-traumatic growth in cancer survivors: Narrative markers and functions of the experience’s transformation. The Qualitative Report, 21, 765–780. Retrieved from: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol21/iss4/11
57.
MartinoM. L.OnoratoR.D’OrianoV.FredaM. F. (2013). Donne e tumore al seno: effetti del protocollo guidato di scrittura sui sintomi associati al disturbo post traumatico da stress [Women and breast cancer: Effects of guided written disclosure protocol on post-traumatic stress]. Psicologia della salute, 1, 125–137. doi: 10.3280/PDS2013-001007
58.
MartinoM. L.OnoratoR.FredaM. L. (2015). Linguistic markers of processing trauma experience in women’s written narratives during different breast cancer phases: Implications for clinical interventions. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 11(4), 651–663. doi:10.5964/ejop.v11i4.991
59.
MasulloP. A. (1992). Patosofia: L’antropologia relazionale di Viktor von Weizsäcker [Pathosophy: The relational anthropology of Victor von Weizsacker]. Milano, Italy: Edizioni Angelo Guerini e Associati.
60.
Matte BlancoI. (1975). The unconscious as infinite sets: An essay in bi-logic. London, UK: Gerald Duckworth & Company.
61.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
62.
NeumanY. (2003). Processes and boundaries of the mind: Extending the limit line. New York, NY: Academic/Plenum.
63.
NeumanY. (2014). Introduction to computational cultural psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
64.
NeumanY.NaveO. (2010). Why the brain needs language in order to be self-conscious. New Ideas in Psychology, 28, 37–48. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.05.001
65.
PeirceC. S. (1935). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66.
PrigogineI. (2004). Beyond being and becoming. New Perspectives Quarterly, 21(4), 5–12.
67.
RasiniV. (2002). Teorie della realtà organica: Helmuth Plessner e Viktor von Weizsäcker [Theories of organic reality: Helmuth Plessner and Victor von Weizsacker]. Modena, Italy: Sigem.
68.
SalvatoreS. (2013). The reciprocal inherency of self and context: Notes for a semiotic model of the constitution of experience. Interacções. The Semiotic Construction of Self, 9, 20–50.
69.
SalvatoreS. (2016). Psychology in black and white: The project of a theory-driven science. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
70.
SalvatoreS.FredaM. F. (2011). Affect, unconscious, and sensemaking: A psychodynamic, semiotic and dialogical model. New Ideas in Psychology, 29(2), 119–135.
71.
SalvatoreS.ValsinerJ. (2010). Between the general and the unique: Overcoming the nomothetic versus idiographic opposition. Theory & Psychology, 20, 817–833. doi: 10.1177/0959354310381156
72.
SalvatoreS.ZittounT. (2011). Outlines of a psychoanalytically informed cultural psychology. In SalvatoreS.ZittounT. (Eds.), Cultural psychology and psychoanalysis in dialogue: Issues for constructive theoretical and methodological synergies (pp. 3–46). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
73.
SatoT.ValsinerJ. (2010). Time in life and life in time: Between experiencing and accounting. Ritsumeikan Journal of Human Science, 20, 79–92.
74.
SebeokT. A.DanesiM. (2000). The forms of meaning: Modeling systems theory and semiotic analysis. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
75.
SimãoL. M. (2003). Beside rupture-disquiet; Beyond the other-alterity. Culture & Psychology, 9, 449–459.
76.
SimãoL. M. (2005). Bildung, culture and self: A possible dialogue with Gadamer, Boesch and Valsiner. Theory & Psychology, 15, 549–574.
77.
SimpsonP. (2010). Modality. In HermanD.ManfredJ. A. H. N.Marie-LaureR. Y. A. N. (Eds.), Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory (pp. 435–436). New York, NY: Routledge.
78.
SmytheW. E. (2005). On the psychology of “as if”. Theory & Psychology, 15, 283–303.
79.
StanghelliniG.AmbrosiniA.CigliaR.FusilliA. (2008). Atlante di fenomenologia dinamica [Handbook of dynamic phenomenology]. Roma, Italy: Ed. Scientifiche Ma.Gi.
80.
SugarmanJ.SokolB. (2012). Human agency and development: An introduction and theoretical sketch. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 1–14.
81.
TateoL. (2013). Generalization as creative and reflective act: Revisiting Lewin’s conflict between Aristotelian and Galileian modes of thought in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 23, 518–536.
82.
TateoL. (2015). Giambattista Vico and the psychological imagination. Culture & Psychology, 21, 145–161.
83.
TateoL.ValsinerJ. (2015). Time breath of psychological theories: A meta-theoretical focus. Review of General Psychology, 19, 357–364.
84.
TronickE. (2010). Multilevel meaning making and dyadic expansion of consciousness theory: The emotional and the polymorphic polysemic flow of meaning. In FoshaD.SiegelD. J.SolomonM. (Eds.), The healing power of emotion (pp. 86–111). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.
85.
ValsinerJ. (2002). Irreversibility of time and ontopotentiality of signs. Estudios de Psicología, 23(1), 49–59.
86.
ValsinerJ. (2004, February). Semiotic autoregulation: Dynamic sign hierarchies constraining the stream of consciousness. Seminar presentation at the Seminar on Symbolic Forms, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.
87.
ValsinerJ. (2007). Culture in minds and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology. New Delhi, India: Sage.
88.
ValsinerJ. (2011). Constructing the vanishing present between the future and the past. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 34, 141–150. doi: 10.1174/021037011795377601
89.
ValsinerJ. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. London, UK: Sage.
90.
ValsinerJ.De Luca PicioneR. (2017). La regolazione dinamica dei processi affettivi attraverso la mediazione semiotica [Dynamic regulation of affective processes through semiotic mediation]. Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia, 8(1), 80–109.
91.
VarziA. (2010). Kripke: Modalità e verità [Kripke: Modality and thruth]. In BorghiniA. (Ed.), Il genio compreso: La filosofia di Saul Kripke [The understood genius: Saul Kripke’s philosophy] (pp. 23–78). Roma, Italy: Carocci Editore.
92.
VetrugnoL.Di PettaG.AmbrosiniA.StanghelliniG. (2014). Fenomenologia del Patico e Gruppoanalisi dell’esserci [Phenomenology of pathic and group analysis of being-there]. Comprendere. Archive International pour l’Anthropologie et la Psychopathologie Phénoménologiques, 24, 252–270.
93.
von WeizsäckerV. (1956). Pathosophie [Pathosophy]. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
94.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
