This article provides a criticism of the model of fragmented moral cognition, which states that the processes of moral evaluation are fragmented, compartmentalized, and discontinuous at a cognitive level, in accordance with dual process theories of reasoning. Contrary to this view, I argue that the concept of “moral mind” stands for a graded and continuous mechanism of thinking, without functional breaks between intuitive processing and conscious reasoning. Therefore, I suggest that moral cognition is a general psychological process—a moral continuum—that is irreducible to any particular type or style of reasoning.
AtranS.AxelrodR.DavisR. (2007). Sacred barriers to conflict resolution. Science, 317, 1039–1040.
2.
BaierK. (1958). The moral point of view. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
3.
BanerjeeK.HuebnerB.HauserM. (2010). Intuitive moral judgments are robust across variation in gender, education, politics, and religion: A large-scale web-based study. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10, 253–281.
4.
BekoffM. (2004). Wild justice and fair play: Cooperation, forgiveness, and morality in animals. Biology and Philosophy, 19, 489–520.
5.
BoudonR. (2010). The cognitive approach to morality. In HitlinS.VaiseyS. (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of morality (pp. 15–33). New York, NY: Springer.
6.
BrosnanS. F.de WaalF. B. M. (2003, September18). Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature, 425(6955), 297–299. doi: 10.1038/nature01963
7.
BrosnanS. F.de WaalF. B. M. (2014, October17). Evolution of responses to (un)fairness. Science, 346(6207). doi: 10.1126/science.1251776
8.
BucciarelliM.KhemlaniS.Johnson-LairdP. N. (2008). The psychology of moral reasoning. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(2), 121–139.
9.
CleeremansA.JimenezL. (2002). Implicit learning and consciousness: A graded, dynamical perspective. In FrenchR. M.CleeremansA. (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, philosophical and computational consensus in the making (pp. 1–40). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
10.
DamasioA.DamasioH. (2014). Is there a moral brain? In KornhaberM. L.WinnerE. (Eds.), Mind, work, and life: A festchrift on the occasion of Howard Gardner’s 70th birthday (Vol. 1, pp. 288–296). Cambridge, MA: The Offices of Howard Gardner.
11.
DecetyJ.CowellJ. (2014). The complex relation between morality and empathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 337–339.
12.
DecetyJ.WheatleyT. (Eds). (2015). The moral brain: A multidisciplinary perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
DwyerS.HuebnerB.HauserM. D. (2010). The linguistic analogy: Motivations, results, and speculations. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 486–510.
14.
ErbH. P.KruglanskiA. W.ChunW. Y.PierroA.MannettiL.SpiegelS. (2003). Searching for commonalities in human judgment: The parametric unimodel and its dual mode alternatives. European Review of Social Psychology, 14, 1–47.
15.
EvansJ.St.B. T.StanovichK. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241.
16.
FrankenaW. K. (1958). Obligation and motivation in recent moral philosophy. In MeldenA. I (Ed.), Essays in moral philosophy (pp. 40–81). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
17.
FrankenaW. K. (1973). Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
GardnerH. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic Books.
19.
GazzanigaM. S. (2006). The ethical brain: The science of our moral dilemmas. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
20.
GigchJ. P. V. (1978). Applied general systems theory. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
21.
GigchJ. P. V. (1990). The importance of metaethics. Human Systems Management, 10, 287–292.
22.
GigerenzerG.RegierT. (1996). How do we tell and association from a rule? Comment on Sloman (1996). Psychological Bulletin, 119, 23–26.
23.
GillM. J.PackerD. J.Van BavelJ. (2013). More to morality than mutualism: Consistent contributors exist and they can inspire costly generosity in others. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(1), 90–91. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000799
24.
GoodwinG.DarleyJ. (2008). The psychology of meta-ethics: Exploring objectivism. Cognition, 106, 1339–1366.
25.
GreeneJ. D. (2003, October). From neural “is” to moral “ought”: What are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology. Neuroscience, 4, 847–850.
26.
GreeneJ. D. (2005). Cognitive neuroscience and the structure of the moral mind. In LaurenceS.CarruthersP.StichS. (Eds.), The innate mind: Structure and contents (Vol. 1, pp. 338–353). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27.
GreeneJ. D. (2013). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
28.
GreeneJ. D. (2014). The cognitive neuroscience of moral judgment and decision-making. In GazzanigaM. S. (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (5th ed., pp. 987–1001). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
GreeneJ. D. (2015). The rise of moral cognition. Cognition, 135, 39–42.
30.
GreeneJ. D.HaidtJ. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517–523.
31.
HabermasJ. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society: Vol. 1. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
32.
HabermasJ. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
HabermasJ. (2008). Between naturalism and religion: Philosophical essays. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
34.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.
HaidtJ. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
37.
HaidtJ.JosephC. (2007). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In CarruthersP.LaurenceS.StichS (Eds.), The innate mind (Vol. 3, pp. 367–391). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38.
HamlinJ. K. (2013). Moral judgment and action in preverbal infants and toddlers: Evidence for an innate moral core. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 186–193.
39.
HammondK. (1996). Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, and unavoidable injustice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40.
HareR. M. (1963). The language of morals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
41.
HareR. M. (1981). Moral thinking: Its levels, method and point. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
42.
HauserM. (2006). Moral minds: How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
43.
HauserM.YoungL.CushmanF. (2008). Reviving Rawls’ linguistic analogy: Operative principles and the causal structure of moral actions. In Sinnott-ArmstrongW. (Ed.), Moral psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 247–326). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44.
HolyoakK. J.KohK.NisbettR. E. (1989). A theory of conditioned reasoning: Inductive learning within rule-based hierarchies. Psychological Review, 96, 315–340.
JohnsonM. (2014). Morality for humans: Ethical understanding from the perspective of cognitive science. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
47.
JoyceR. (2006). The evolution of morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48.
KantI. (2010a). Fundamental principles of the metaphysical of morals. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
49.
KantI. (2010b). The critique of practical reason. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
50.
KerenG.SchulY. (2009). Two is not always better than one: A critical evaluation of two-system theories. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 500–533.
51.
KnobeJ. (2003). Intentional action in folk psychology: An experimental investigation. Philosophical Psychology, 16, 309–324.
52.
KohlbergL. (1984). Essays in moral development: Vol. 1. The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
53.
KohlbergL.LevineC.HewerA. (1983). Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics. Basel, NY: Karger.
54.
KrebsD. L. (2008). The evolution of a sense of justice. In DuntleyJ.ShackelfordT. K. (Eds.), Evolutionary forensic psychology (pp. 229–245). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
55.
KruglanskiA. (2013). Only one? The default-interventionist perspective as a unimodel-commentary on Evans & Stanovich (2013). Perspectives in Psychological Sciences, 8(3), 242–247.
56.
KruglanskiA. W.GigerenzerG. (2011). Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychological Review, 118(1), 97–109.
57.
KutscheraF. V. (1973). Einführung in die Logik der Normen, Werte und Entscheidungen [Introduction to the logic of norms, values and decisions]. Freiburg, Germany: Alber.
58.
LeslieA.KnobeJ.CohenA. (2006). Acting intentionally and the side-effect effect: “Theory of mind” and moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17, 421–427.
59.
LindquistK. A.WagerT. D.KoberH.Bliss-MoreauE.BarrettL. F. (2011). The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 173, 1–86.
60.
LorenzenP. (1969). Normative logic and ethics. Mannheim, Germany: BI-Verlag.
61.
MikhailJ. M. (2000). Rawls’ linguistic analogy: A study of the “generative grammar” model of moral theory described by John Rawls in “A Theory of Justice” (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
62.
MikhailJ. M. (2008). Moral cognition and computational theory. In Sinnott-ArmstrongW. (Ed.), Moral psychology: The evolution of morality: Adaptation and innateness, (Vol. 1, pp. 345–351). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63.
MikhailJ. M. (2011). Elements of moral cognition: Rawls’ linguistic analogy and the cognitive science of moral and legal judgment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
64.
MikhailJ. M.SorrentinoC.SpelkeE. (1998). Toward a universal moral grammar. In GernsbacherM. A.DerryS. J. (Eds.), Proceedings, Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 1250). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
65.
MollJ. (2005). The neural basis of human moral cognition. Neuroscience, 6, 799–809.
66.
MollJ.de Oliveira-SouzaR.GarridoG.BramatiI.Caparelli-DaquerE.PaivaM.… GrafmanJ. (2007). The self as moral agent: Linking the neural bases of social agency and moral sensitivity. Social Neuroscience, 2(3–4), 336–352.
67.
MoranS.GardnerH. (2007). Hill, skill, and will: Executive function from a multiple-intelligences perspective. In MeltzerL. (Ed.), Executive function in education: From theory to practice (pp. 19–38). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
68.
NielsenK. (1999). Moral point of view theories. Critica, Revista hispanoamericana de filosofia, XXXI(93), 105–116.
69.
OsmanM. (2004). An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 988–1010.
70.
PerelmanC. (1963). The idea of justice and the problem of argument. London, UK: Humanities Press.
71.
PessoaL. (2008). On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 148–158.
72.
PettitD.KnobeJ. (2009). The pervasive impact of moral judgment. Mind & Language, 24(5), 586–604.
73.
PierceJ.BekoffM. (2012). Wild justice redux: What we know about social justice in animals and why it matters. Social Justice Research, 25(2), 122–139.
74.
PinkerS. (1997). How the mind works. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
75.
RawlsJ. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
76.
RawlsJ. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
77.
RiedlK.JensenK.CallJ.TomaselloM. (2015). Restorative justice in children. Current Biology, 25, 1–5.
78.
ScanlonT. M. (1998). What we owe to each other. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
79.
ShackmanA. J.SalomonsT. V.SlagterH. A.FoxA. S.WinterJ. J.DavidsonR. J. (2011). The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 154–167.
80.
SingerM. G. (1961). Generalization in ethics: An essay in the logic of ethics, with the rudiments of a system of moral philosophy. New York, NY: Knopf.
81.
SkitkaL. J. (2010). The psychology of moral conviction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 267–281.
82.
SkitkaL. J.WisneskiD. (2012). Justice theory and research: A social functionalist perspective. In SulsJ.TennenH. (Eds.), The handbook of psychology (2nd ed., pp. 407–428). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
83.
SperberD. (1994). The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In HirschfeldL. A.GelmanS. A. (Eds.), Mapping the Mind (pp. 39–67). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
84.
SperberD. (2002). In defense of massive modularity. In DupouxI. (Ed.), Language, brain, and cognitive development (pp. 47–57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85.
SpiveyM. (2008). The continuity of mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
86.
SpiveyM. J.DaleR. (2004). On the continuity of mind: Toward a dynamical account of cognition. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 45, 87–142.
87.
StanovichK. (2009). Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory? In FrankishK.EvansJ. St. B. T. (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 55–88). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
88.
TononiG.KochC. (2008). The neural correlates of consciousness–an update. Year in Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 1124, 239–261.
89.
ToulminS. (1986). The place of reason in ethics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
90.
TurielE.PerkinsS. A. (2004). Flexibilities of mind: Conflict and culture. Human Development, 47, 158–178.
91.
VerplaetseJ.De SchrijverJ.VannesteS.BraeckmanJ. (Eds). (2009). The moral brain: Essays on the evolutionary and neuroscientific aspects of morality. New York, NY: Springer.
92.
WallaceJ. R. (2013). The deontic structure of morality. In BackhurstD.HookerB.LittleM. O. (Eds.), Thinking about reasons: Themes from the philosophy of Jonathan Dancy (pp. 137–167). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
93.
WarnekenF.TomaselloM. (2014). The developmental and evolutionary origins of human helping and sharing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
94.
WeberJ. M.MurnighanJ. K. (2008). Suckers or saviors? Consistent contributors in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1340–1353.
95.
ZahnR.de OliveiraR.MollJ. (2011). The neuroanatomical basis of moral cognition and emotion. In EbsteinR.Shamay-TsooryS.Hong ChewS. (Eds.), From DNA to social cognition (pp. 123–138). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
