The term liminality is often used to celebrate escape from rigid structures or to promote creativity. However, the collapse of the stable frameworks of social life also generates anguishing conditions of uncertainty. This article introduces the term “permanent liminality” for situations in which the temporary suspension of normality becomes permanent. Such situations of entrapment within an interstitial dimension produce an emotional overheat, generating a “liminal hotspot.” This paper addresses the possibility of ending such entrapment. Reasoning cannot guide out of permanent liminality, as—in the absence of stability necessary to apprehend ratio, or harmonious proportionality—it is also liable to short-circuit, being closely associated under liminal conditions with imitativity. A solution is offered, through Pascal rather than Kant, by the heart. Such an idea also receives support from the Palaeolithic Age, maternal heartbeat in the womb, and long-distance walking pilgrimage.
AlexanderJ.GiesenB.MastJ. (Eds.). (2006). Social performance: Symbolic action, cultural pragmatics, and ritual. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AugéM. (1995). Non-places: An introduction to anthropology of supermodernity. London: Verso.
5.
BatesonG. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York, NY: Ballantine.
6.
BorkenauF. (1984). La transizione dall’immagine feudale all’immagine borghese del mondo [The transition from the feudal to the bourgeois image of the world]. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.
BrochH. (1985). The sleepwalkers. San Francisco, CA: North Point.
9.
BrockA. C. (2006). Rediscovering the history of psychology: Interview with Kurt Danziger. History of Psychology, 9(1), 1–16.
10.
Creative Differences. (Producer), & HerzogW. (Director). (2010). Cave of forgotten dreams [Motion picture]. France: Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication.
DesmondW. (1995). Between finitude and infinity: Hegelian reason and the Pascalian heart. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 9(2), 83–110.
13.
DissanayakeE. (2001). Antecedents of the temporal arts in early mother-infant interaction. In WallinN.MerkerB.BrownS. (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 389–410). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
FergusonH. (2010). Comparing (sick) notes: Intercultural reflections on modernity and disease in the writings of Thomas Mann and Jun’ichirō Tanizaki. International Political Anthropology, 3(1), 29–53.
15.
ForceP. (2003). Pascal and philosophical method. In HammondN. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Pascal (pp. 216–231). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FoucaultM. (1982). The subject and power. In DreyfusH.RabinowP. (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
FoucaultM. (1984). What is enlightenment? In RabinowP. (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 32–50). New York, NY: Pantheon.
18.
FoucaultM. (2001). L’Herméneutique du sujet: Cours au Collège de France, 1981–1982 [The hermeneutics of the subject: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1981–1982]. Paris, France: Gallimard.
19.
GilboaA. (2014). The dual nature of the womb and its implications for music therapy. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 23(3), 242–262. doi: 10.1080/08098131.2013.809784
20.
GrecoM.StennerP. (2017). From paradox to pattern shift: Conceptualising liminal hotspots and their affective dynamics. Theory & Psychology, 27, 147–166.
21.
HabermasJ. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
22.
HänschA. (2016). Symbolic patterns of childbirth. Bern: Peter Lang.
23.
HeideggerM. (1977). The question concerning technology. In KrellD. F. (Ed.), Basic writings (pp. 283–317). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
24.
HorváthÁ. (2000). The nature of the trickster’s game (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). European University Institute, Florence, Italy.
25.
HorváthÁ. (2013). Modernism and charisma. London, UK: Palgrave.
26.
HorváthÁ. (in press). Charisma/trickster: On the twofold nature of power. In ThomassenB.WydraH. (Eds.), Handbook of political anthropology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
27.
HorváthÁ.ThomassenB. (2008). Mimetic errors in liminal schismogenesis: On the political anthropology of the trickster. International Political Anthropology, 1(1), 3–24.
KantI. (1998). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (GregorM., Ed. & Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
KaufmannW. (1974). Nietzsche: Philosopher, psychologist, antichrist. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
32.
KoselleckR. (1985). Futures past: On the semantics of historical time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
LevitinD. (2006). This is your brain on music: The science of a human obsession. London, UK: Penguin.
34.
MasatakaN. (1998). Perception of motherese in Japanese sign language by 6-month-old hearing infants. Developmental Psychology, 34(2), 241–246.
35.
MoriartyM. (2003). Grace and religious belief in Pascal. In HammondN. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Pascal (pp. 144–161). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
MorrisT. K. (1992). Making sense of it all: Pascal and the meaning of life. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
SzakolczaiÁ. (2009). Liminality and experience: Structuring transitory situations and transformative events. International Political Anthropology, 2(1), 141–172.
47.
SzakolczaiÁ. (2013a). Comedy and the public sphere: The re-birth of theatre as comedy and the genealogy of the modern public arena. London, UK: Routledge.
48.
SzakolczaiÁ. (2013b). Gennep, Arnold van. In McGeeR. J.WarmsR. L. (Eds.), Theory in social and cultural anthropology: An encyclopedia (Vol. 1, pp. 320–323). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
SzakolczaiÁ. (2016). Novels and the sociology of the contemporary. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
50.
ThomassenB. (2012). Émile Durkheim between Gabriel Tarde and Arnold van Gennep: Founding moments of sociology and anthropology. Social Anthropology, 20(3), 231–249.
51.
ThomassenB. (2014). Liminality and the modern: Living through the in-between. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
52.
TurnerV. W. (1967). Betwixt and between: The liminal period in rites de passage. In Forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual (pp. 93–111). New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
53.
TurnerV. W. (1969). The ritual process. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
54.
TurnerV. W. (1985a). The anthropology of performance. In TurnerE. (Ed.), On the edge of the bush (pp. 177–205). Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.
55.
TurnerV. W. (1985b). Experience and performance: Towards a new processual anthropology. In TurnerE. (Ed.), On the edge of the bush (pp. 206–226). Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.
56.
TurnerV. W. (1992). Blazing the trail: Waymarks in the exploration of symbols. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.
57.
van GennepA. (1960). The rites of passage. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1909)
58.
VoegelinE. (1999). Nietzsche and Pascal. In The collected works of Eric Voegelin: Vol. 25. History of political ideas: Vol. 7. The new order and last orientation (pp. 216–231). Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
59.
WhitmanW. (1990). Leaves of grass. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
60.
WhitwellG. E. (1999). Importance of prenatal sound and music. Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health, 13(3–4), 255–262.
