Instruments have become a central feature of psychological science. Their introduction into a research paradigm is typically framed in terms of their practical utility in offering calibration and precision in the presentation, representation, and recording of phenomena. However, a review of early experimental psychology reveals that instruments have an additional role in terms of the accumulation of domain-specific status, or prestige. The emergence and use of prestige technologies reflects a general feature of social organization wherein group members must compete for the attention of a community. An examination of the introduction of the chronoscope demonstrates that while there was an awareness of its functional limitations, these limits were often not prominent features of later paradigmatic discourse. In contrast to early adopters, later researchers appear to have demonstrated a reduced concern for these limitations suggesting that these instruments were being used as much for their prestige function as their practical utility.
AdamsR. N. (1975). Energy and structure: A theory of social power. Austin: University of Texas Press.
2.
AndersenH.BarkerP.ChenX. (2006). The cognitive structure of scientific revolutions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AngleJ. (1986). The surplus theory of social stratification and the size distribution of personal wealth. Social Forces, 65, 293–326. doi: 10.1093/sf/65.2.293
4.
ArthurW. B. (2007). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. New York, NY: The Free Press.
5.
BairdD. (2004). Thing knowledge: A philosophy of scientific instruments. Berkeley: University California Press.
6.
BasallaG. (1988). The evolution of technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BaymanJ. M. (2002). Hohokam craft economies and the materialization of power. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 9, 69–95. doi: 10.1023/A:1016132225354
8.
BeaulieuA. (2001). Voxels in the brain: Neuroscience, informatics and changing notions of objectivity. Social Studies of Science, 31, 635–680. doi: 10.1177/030631201031005001
9.
BecherT.TrowlerP. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Philadelphia, PA: SRHE and Open University Press.
10.
BenjaminL. T.DeLeonP. H.FreedheimD. K.VandenbosG. R. (2003). Psychology as a profession. In WeinerI. B.FreedheimD. K. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 1. History of psychology (pp. 27–45). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
11.
BenschopR. (1998). What is a tachistoscope? Historical exploration of an instrument. Science in Context, 11, 23–50. doi: 10.1017/S0269889700002908
12.
BenschopR.DraaismaD. (2000). In pursuit of precision: The calibration of minds and machines in late nineteenth-century psychology. Annals of Science, 57, 1–25. doi: 10.1080/000337900296281
13.
BierstadtR. (1950). An analysis of social power. American Sociological Review, 15, 730–738.
14.
BlackmoreS. (1999). The meme machine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15.
BlumhagenD. W. (1979). The doctor’s white coat: The image of the physician in modern America. Annals of Internal Medicine, 9, 111–115.
16.
BondR.SmithP. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111–137. doi: 10.1037/0033–2909.119.1.111
17.
BordonsM.MorilloF.GómezI. (2005). Analysis of cross-disciplinary research through bibliometric tools. In MoedH. F.GlänzelW.SchmochU. (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 437–456). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
18.
BouchardJ.-P.MézardM. (2000). Wealth condensation in a simple model of economy. Physica A, 282, 536–545. doi: 10.1016/S0378–4371(00)00205–3
19.
BoydR.RichersonP. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
BringmannW. G.BalanceW. D. G.EvansR. B. (1975). Wilhelm Wundt 1832–1920: A brief biographical sketch. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 11, 294. doi: 10.1002/1520–6696(197507)11:3
21.
BringmannW. G.BringmannN. J.UngererG. A. (1980). The establishment of Wundt’s laboratory: An archival and documentary study. In BringmannW. G.TweneyR. D. (Eds.), Wundt studies (pp. 123–157). Toronto, Canada: Hogrefe.
22.
BryanW. L. (1890). Psychology at Indiana University. The American Journal of Psychology, 3, 283–284.
23.
BurkeJ.OrnsteinR. (1995). The axemakers gift: Technology’s capture and control of our minds and culture. New York, NY: Tarcher Putnam.
24.
CampbellD. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioural Science, 3, 12–25. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830030103
25.
CancianF. (1965). Economics and prestige in a Maya community. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
CapshewJ. H. (1988). The legacy of the laboratory (1888–1988): A history of the department of psychology at Indiana University. In HearstE.CapshewJ. H. (Eds.), Psychology at Indiana university: A centennial review and compendium (pp. 1–83). Bloomington: Indiana University Department of Psychology.
27.
CapshewJ. H. (1992). Psychologists on site: A reconnaissance of the historiography of the laboratory. American Psychologist, 47, 132–142. doi: 10.1037/0003–066X.47.2.132
28.
CattellJ. M. (1890). Psychology at the University of Pennsylvania. The American Journal of Psychology, 3, 281–283.
29.
ChaikenS.MaheswaranD. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460–473. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.66.3.460
30.
CharlesworthM.FarrallL.StokesT.TurnbullD. (1989). Life among the scientists. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
31.
ClarkG. (1986). Symbols of excellence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
ClarkJ. E.BlakeM. (1994). The power of prestige: Competitive generosity and the emergence of rank societies in lowland Mesoamerica. In BrumfielE.FoxJ. (Eds.), Factional competition and political development in the new world (pp. 17–30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
ColeJ. R.ColeS. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
ConstantE. W. (1987). The social locus of technological practice: Community, system in organization. In BijkerW. E.HughesT. P.PinchT. (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 223–242). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
CoonD. J. (1992). Testing the limits of sense and science: American experimental psychologists combat spiritualism, 1880–1920. American Psychologist, 47, 143–151. doi: 10.1037/0003–066X.47.2.143
36.
CoonD. J. (1993). Standardizing the subject: Experimental psychologists, introspection, and the quest for a technoscientific ideal. Technology and Culture, 34, 757–783. doi: 10.2307/3106414
37.
DanzigerK. (1980). Wundt and the two traditions of psychology. In RieberR. W. (Ed.), Wilhelm Wundt and the making of a scientific psychology (pp. 73–87). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
38.
DanzigerK. (1985). The origins of the psychological experiment as a social institution. American Psychologist, 40, 133–140. doi: 10.1037/0003–066X.40.2.133
39.
DanzigerK. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
40.
DanzigerK. (2008). Marking the mind: A history of memory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
DastonL. (1995). The moral economy of science. Osiris, 10, 2–24.
42.
DastonL.GalisonP. (1992). The image of objectivity. Representations, 40, 81–128.
43.
DavisR. C. (1970). The brass age of psychology: The laboratory instruments exhibit of the archives of the history of American psychology. Technology and Culture, 11, 604–612. doi: 10.2307/3102696
44.
de ChadarevianS. (1993). Graphical method and discipline: Self-recording instruments in nineteenth-century physiology. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 24, 267–291. doi: 10.1016/0039–3681(93)90048-O
45.
DennettD. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
46.
de Solla PriceD. (1965). Is technology historically independent of science? A study in statistical historiography. Technology and Culture, 6, 553–568.
47.
de Solla PriceD. (1983). Sealing wax and string: A philosophy of the experimenter’s craft and its role in the genesis of high technology. George Sarton Memorial Lecture, American Association for the Advancement of Science Meeting.
48.
de Solla PriceD. (1984). The science/technology relationship, the craft of experimental science and policy for the improvement of high technology innovation. Research Policy, 13, 3–20. doi: 10.1016/0048–7333(84)90003–9
49.
DonovanA.LaudanL.LaudanR. (1988). Scrutinizing science: Empirical studies of scientific change. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
50.
DunckerK. (1945). On problem solving (LeesL. S., Trans.). Psychological Monographs, 68(5, Whole No. 270). (Original work published 1935)
51.
EisenlohrW. (1852). Lehrbuch der Physik zum Gebrauche bei Vorlesungen und zum Selbstunterrichte: Vol. 6 [Physics textbook for use in lectures and individual study: Vol. 6]. Stuttgart, Germany: Auflage.
52.
EklundA.NicholsT. E.KnutssonH. (2016). Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. PNAS, 1–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602413113
53.
EvansR. B. (2000). Psychological instruments at the turn of the century. American Psychologist, 55, 322–325. doi: 10.1037//0003–066X.55.3.322
54.
FernbergerS. W. (1933). Wundt’s doctorate students. Psychological Bulletin, 30, 80–83.
55.
FiskeA. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. New York, NY: Free Press.
56.
FiskeS. T. (2010). Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 941–982). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
57.
FullerS. (1988). Social epistemology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
58.
GalisonP. (1987). How experiments end. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
59.
GalisonP. (2003). Einstein’s clocks, Poincaré’s maps: Empires of time. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
60.
GalisonP. (2004). Image of self. In DastonL. (Ed.), Things that talk: Object lessons from art and science (pp. 257–294). New York, NY: Zone Books.
61.
GentnerD.StevensA. L. (1983). Mental models. London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
62.
GermanT. P.BarrettH. C. (2005). Functional fixedness in a technologically sparse culture. Psychological Science, 16, 1–5. doi: 10.1111/j.0956–7976.2005.00771.x
63.
GibsonJ. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In ShawR.BransfordJ. (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 67–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64.
GibsonJ. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
65.
GierynT. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
66.
GigerenzerG. (1991). From tools to theories: A heuristic of discovery in cognitive psychology. Psychological Review, 98, 254–267.
67.
GigerenzerG.SturmT. (2006). Tools = theories = data? On some circular dynamics in cognitive science. In AshM. G.StrumT. (Eds.), Psychology’s territories: Historical and contemporary perspectives from different disciplines (pp. 305–342). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
68.
GoodeW. J. (1977). The celebration of heroes: Prestige as a social control system. Berkeley: University of California Press.
69.
GuinoteA. (2013). Social power and cognition. In CarlstonD. E. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 575–587). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
70.
GundlachH. (1996). The Hipp chronoscope as totem pole and the formation of a new tribe –Applied psychology, psychotechnics, and rationality. Teorie and Modelli, 1, 65–85.
71.
GundlachH. (2007). What is a psychological instrument? In AshM. G.StrumT. (Eds.), Psychology’s territories: Historical and contemporary perspectives from different disciplines (pp. 195–224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
72.
HackingI. (1992). The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences. In PickeringA. (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 29–64). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
73.
HagstromW. O. (1965). The scientific community. New York, NY: Basic Books.
74.
HankinsT. L.SilvermanR. J. (1995). Instruments and the imagination. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
75.
HannawayO. (1986). Laboratory design and the aim of science: Andreas Libavius versus Tycho Brahe. Isis, 77, 584–610.
76.
HardwigJ. (1985). Epistemic dependence. The Journal of Philosophy, 82, 335–349.
77.
HarperE. B. (1964). Ritual pollution as an integrator of caste and religion. Journal of Asian Studies, 23, 151–197.
78.
HarréR. (2009). Pavlov’s dog and Schrödinger’s cat. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
79.
HarréR. (2010). Equipment for an experiment. Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science, 4, 30–38. doi: 10.4245/sponge.v4i1.11334
80.
HaydenB. (1998). Practical and prestige technologies: The evolution of material systems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 5, 1–55. doi: 10.1007/BF02428415
81.
HeckenbergerM. J. (2005). The ecology of power: Culture, place, and personhood in the Southern Amazon, A. D. 1000–2000. New York, NY: Routledge.
82.
HeidelbergerM. (2003). Theory-ladenness and scientific instruments in experimentation. In RadderH. (Ed.), The philosophy of scientific experimentation I (pp. 138–151). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
83.
HeidelbergerM. (2004). Nature from within: Gustav Theodor Fechner and his psychophysical worldview (KlohrC., Trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
84.
HendonJ. A. (1999). Multiple sources of prestige and the social evaluation of women in pre-Hispanic Mesoamerica. In RobbJ. E. (Ed.), Material symbols: Culture and economy in prehistory (pp. 257–276). Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University.
85.
HenrichJ.BoydR. (1998). The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 19, 215–241. doi: 10.1016/S1090–5138(98)00018-X
86.
HenrichJ.BoydR. (2002). On modeling cognition and culture: Why cultural evolution does not require replication of representations. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 2, 87–112. doi: 10.1163/156853702320281836
87.
HenrichJ.Gil-WhiteF. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165–196. doi: 10.1016/S1090–5138(00)00071–4
88.
HirthK. (1992). Interregional exchange as elite behavior: An evolutionary perspective. In ChaseD. Z.ChaseA. F. (Eds.), Mesoamerican elites: An archaeological assessment (pp. 18–29). Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
89.
HoggM. A.ShermanD. K.DierselhuisJ.MaitnerA. T.MoffittG. (2007). Uncertainty, entitativity, and group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 135–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.008
90.
HughesT. P. (1987). The evolution of large technological systems. In BijkerW. E.HughesT. P.PinchT. (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 45–76). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
91.
HullD. L. (1988). Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
92.
JablonkaE.LambM. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
93.
JastrowJ. (1890). Psychology at the University of Wisconsin. The American Journal of Psychology, 3, 275–276.
94.
Johnson-LairdP. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
95.
JoyceK. (2005). Appealing images: Magnetic resonance imaging and the production of authoritative knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 35, 437–462. doi: 10.1177/0306312705050180
96.
KanS. (1989). Symbolic immortality: The Tlingit potlach of the nineteenth century. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
97.
KaneM. T. (1992). An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 527–535. doi: 10.1037/0033–2909.112.3.527
98.
KingeryW. D. (1993). Technological systems and some implications with regard to continuity and change. In LubarS.KingeryW. D. (Eds.), History from things: Essays on material culture (pp. 215–230). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
99.
Knorr CetinaK. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
100.
KochS. (1985). Wundt’s creature at age zero—and as centenarian: Some aspects of the institutionalization of the “new psychology”. In KochS.LearyD. E. (Eds.), A century of psychology as a science (pp. 7–35). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
101.
KohlerR. E. (1994). Lords of the fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
102.
KruglanskiA. W. (1994). The social-cognitive bases of scientific knowledge. In ShadishW. R.FullerS. (Eds.), The social psychology of science (pp. 197–213). New York, NY: Guilford.
103.
KrullD. S.SilveraD. H. (2013). The stereotyping of science: Superficial details influence perceptions of what is scientific. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 1660–1667. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12118
104.
Lane-FoxA. (1906). The evolution of culture. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
105.
LandesD. S. (1983). Revolutions in time: Clocks and the making of the modern world. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap of the Harvard University Press.
106.
LatourB. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
107.
LatourB.WoolgarS. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
108.
LaudanL. (1977). Progress and its problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.
109.
LawrenceC. (1985). Incommunicable knowledge: Science, technology and the clinical art in Britain 1850–1914. Journal of Contemporary History, 20(4), 503–520.
110.
LeaheyT. H. (2013). A history of psychology: From antiquity to modernity (7th ed.). Toronto, Canada: Pearson Education.
111.
LearyD. (1990). Metaphors in the history of psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
112.
LenoirT. (1994). Helmholtz and the materialities of communication. Osiris, 9, 184–207.
113.
Le PairC. (1980). Switching between academic disciplines in universities in the Netherlands. Scientometrics, 2, 177–191. doi: 10.1007/BF02016696
114.
LeydesdorffL.van den BesselaarP. (1997). Scientometrics and communication theory: Towards theoretically informed indicators. Scientometrics, 38, 155–174. doi: 10.1007/BF02461129
115.
MasonO. T. (1895). The origin of invention: A study of the industry among primitive people. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
116.
McCabeD. P.CastelA. D. (2008). Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition, 107, 343–352. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.017
117.
MesoudiA.WhitenA.LalandK. N. (2006). Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 329–383. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X06009083
118.
MessickS. (1995). Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749. doi: 10.1037/0003–066X.50.9.741
119.
MillerD. (2001). Alienable gifts and inalienable commodities. In MyersF. (Ed.), The empire of things: Regimes of value and material culture (pp. 91–115). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.
120.
MoedH. F.GlänzelW.SchmochU. (2005). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
121.
MumfordL. (1934). Technics and civilization. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
122.
NeedhamJ.LingW.de Solla PriceD. (1986). Heavenly clockwork: The great astronomical clocks of medieval China (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
123.
NeimanF. D. (1995). Stylistic variation in evolutionary perspective: Inferences from decorative diversity and interassemblage distance in Illinois woodland ceramic assemblages. American Antiquity, 60, 7–36.
124.
NormanD. A. (2003). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books. (Original work published 1988)
125.
O’BrienM. J.BentleyR. A. (2011). Stimulated variation and cascades: Two processes in the evolution of complex technological systems. Journal of Archaeology Method and Theory, 18, 309–335. doi: 10.1007/s10816–011–9110–7
126.
O’BrienM.LymanR. L. (2000). Applying evolutionary archaeology: A systematic approach. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
127.
O’BrienM. J.ShennanS. J. (Eds.). (2010). Innovation in cultural systems: Contributions from evolutionary anthropology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
128.
OrtnerS. B.WhiteheadH. (1981). Introduction: Accounting for sexual meanings. In OrtnerS. B.WhiteheadH. (Eds.), Sexual meanings: The cultural construction of gender and sexuality (pp. 1–27). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
129.
OtisL. (2007). Müller’s lab. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
130.
PettyR. E.WegenerD. T.FabrigarL. R. (1997). Attitude and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 609–647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.609
131.
PopplestoneJ. A.McPhersonM. W. (1994). An illustrated history of American psychology. Madison, WI: Wm. C. Brown.
132.
ReiserS. J. (1978). Medicine and the reign of technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
133.
RhodesR. E.RodriguezF.ShahP. (2014). Explaining the alluring influence of neuroscience information on scientific reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1432–1440. doi: 10.1037/a0036844
134.
RichersonP. J.ChristiansenM. H. (2013). Cultural evolution: Society, technology, language, and religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
135.
RogersE. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: The Free Press. (Original work published 1983)
136.
RosenweinR. E. (1994). Social influence in science: Agreement and dissent in achieving scientific consensus. In ShadishW. R.FullerS. (Eds.), The social psychology of science (pp. 262–285). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
137.
SanfordE. C. (1890). Psychology at Clark University. American Journal of Psychology, 3, 284–285.
138.
SassS. L. (1998). The substance of civilization: Materials and human history from the Stone Age to the age of silicon. New York, NY: Arcade.
139.
SatelS.LilienfeldS. D. (2013). Brainwashed: The seductive appeal of mindless neuroscience. New York, NY: Basic Books.
140.
SchifferM. B. (1996). Some relationships between behavioral and evolutionary archaeologies. American Antiquity, 61, 643–662. doi: 10.2307/282009
141.
SchifferM. B. (1999). The material life of human beings: Artifacts, behavior, and communication. London, UK: Routledge.
142.
SchifferM. B. (2005). The devil is in the details: The cascade model of invention processes. American Antiquity, 70, 485–502. doi: 10.2307/40035310
143.
SchifferM. B. (2008). Studying technological differentiation: The case of 18th-century electrical technology. American Anthropologist, 104, 1148–1161. doi: 10.1525/aa.2002.104.4.1148
144.
SchmidgenH. (2003a). Physics, ballistic, and psychology: A history of the chronoscope in/as context, 1845–1890. History of Psychology, 8, 46–78. doi: 10.1037/1093–4510.8.1.46
145.
SchmidgenH. (2003b). Time and noise: The stable surroundings of reaction experiments, 1860–1890. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 34, 237–275. doi: 10.1016/S1369–8486(03)00024–4
146.
SchmidgenH. (2005). The Donders machine: Matter, signs, and time in a physiological experiment, ca 1865. Configurations, 13, 211–256.
147.
SchoenherrJ. R. (2015). Research integrity in research methods. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01562
148.
SchoenherrJ. R.DopkoR. (2016). The engendered paradigm: Demographics changes and the modern psychological paradigm. Manuscript in preparation.
149.
SchoenherrJ. R.HamstraS. J. (2015). Psychometrics and its discontents: A historical perspective on the discourse of the measurement tradition. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21, 719–729. doi: 10.1007/s10459–015–9623-z
150.
SchravenT. (2005). The Hipp chronoscope. Unpublished manuscript, Krefeld, Germany.
151.
ShapinS. (1989). The invisible technician. American Scientist, 77, 554–563.
152.
ShapinS. (1994). A social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
153.
ShapinS. (1995). Cordelia’s love: Credibility and the social studies of science. Perspectives on Science, 3, 255–275.
154.
ShapinS.SchafferS. (1985). Leviathan and the air pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
155.
ShennanS. (2002). Genes, memes, and human history: Darwinian archaeology and cultural evolution. London, UK: Thames & Hudson.
156.
SimontonD. K. (2004). Psychology’s status as a scientific discipline: Its empirical placement within an implicit hierarchy of the sciences. Review of General Psychology, 8, 59–67. doi: 10.1037/1089–2680.8.1.59
157.
SokalM. M. (1972). Psychology at Victorian Cambridge: The unofficial laboratory of 1887–1888. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 116, 145–147.
158.
SokalM. M. (1984). Introduction. In JamesW.Psychology: The briefer course (pp. xi–xii). New York, NY: Holt. (Original work published 1910)
159.
SokalM. M.DavisA. B.MerzbachU. C. (1976). Laboratory instruments in the history of psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 12, 59–64.
160.
StarrP. (1981). The social transformation of medicine: The rise of a sovereign profession and the making of a vast industry. New York, NY: Basic Books.
161.
SturmT.AshM. G. (2005). The role of instruments. History of Psychology, 8, 3–34. doi: 10.1037/1093–4510.8.1.3
162.
TanfordS.PenrodS. (1984). Social influence model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 189–225. doi: 10.1037/0033–2909.95.2.189
163.
TaubL. (2011). Introduction: Reengaging with instruments. Isis, 102, 689–696.
164.
TaylorC. (1971). Interpretation and the sciences of man. Review of Metaphysics, 25, 3–51.
165.
ThorngateW.LiuJ.ChowdhuryW. (2011). The competition for attention and the evolution of science. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 14, 1–6. doi: 10.18564/jasss.1868
166.
TitchenerE. B. (1901–1905). Experimental psychology: A manual of laboratory practice. New York, NY: Macmillan.
167.
TomaselloM.KrugerA. C.RatnerH. H. (1993). Cultural learning. Behavioral and Brain Science, 16, 495–552. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0003123X
168.
ToulminS.LearyD. E. (1985). The cult of empiricism in psychology, and beyond. In KochS.LearyD. E. (Eds.), A century of psychology as science (pp. 594-617). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
169.
TurielE. (1979). Social convention and morality: Two distinct conceptual and developmental systems. In KeaseyC. B. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 25 (pp. 77–116). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
170.
TweneyR. D.BudzynskiC. A. (2000). The scientific status of American psychology in 1900. American Psychologist, 55, 1014–1017. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.9.1014
171.
van den BesselaarP. (2001). The cognitive and the social structure of STS. Scientometrics, 51, 441–460. doi: 10.1023/A:1012714020453
172.
van HeldenA. (1983). The birth of the modern scientific instrument, 1550–1700. In BurkeJ. G. (Ed.), The uses of science in the age of Newton (pp. 49–84). Berkeley: University of California Press.
173.
van HeldenA.HankinsT. L. (1994). Introduction: Instruments in the history of science. Osiris, 9, 1–6.
174.
VulE.HarrisC.WinkielmanP.PashlerH. (2009). Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 274–290.
175.
WeisbergD. S.KeilF. C.GoodsteinJ.RawsonE.GrayJ. R. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 470–477. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20040
176.
WhitenA.HornerV.de WaalF. B. M. (2005). Conformity to cultural norms of tool use in chimpanzees. Nature, 437, 737–740. doi: 10.1038/nature04047
177.
WundtW. (1904). Principles of physiological psychology. New York, NY: Macmillan. (Original work published 1874)
