In this article I juxtapose three critical resources for theoretical psychology: Fanon, Foucault, and feminisms. While the primary focus is on Fanon, some shared methodological assumptions—arising from the influence of Marxism and psychoanalysis on all three—are noted, albeit giving rise to mutual tensions. I then apply this critical frame to a close reading of a clinical case discussed by Fanon in The Wretched of the Earth. As a psychiatrist, but also political revolutionary and psychoeducator, Fanon’s account is read here as indicative of his pedagogical address in motivating for sociopolitical as well as personal change and his therapeutic approach, albeit in need of a feminist re-reading of the gendering of violence, including sexual violence. The paper concludes by suggesting that Fanon’s psychoaffective analysis, first, indicates how resistance and transformation are simultaneously intrapersonal, interpersonal, and sociopolitical, but also that, second, attending to their shifting unstable and relational features works not only to renew and reinvigorate theoretical psychology but also the interventions and perspectives informing psychological and pedagogical activisms.
BarthesR. (1981). Camera lucida: Reflections on photography. New York, NY: Macmillan.
3.
BellV. (1993). Interrogating incest: Feminism, Foucault, and the law. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
4.
BenjaminW. (1969). Illuminations: Essays and reflections. New York, NY: Schocken.
5.
BergnerG. (1995). Who is that masked woman? Or, the role of gender in Fanon’sBlack Skin, White Masks. PMLA, 110(1), 75–88.
6.
BurmanE. (2008). Resisting the deradicalization of psychosocial analyses. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 13(4), 374–378.
7.
BurmanE. (2015). Fanon’s Lacan and the traumatogenic child: Psychoanalytic reflections on the dynamics of colonialism and racism. Theory, Culture & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0263276415598627
8.
ButlerJ. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. New York, NY: Stanford University Press.
9.
ChamberlainK. (2000). Methodolatry and qualitative health research. Journal of Health Psychology, 5(3), 285–296.
10.
ChaseE.WalkerR. (2013). The co-construction of shame in the context of poverty: Beyond a threat to the social bond. Sociology, 47(4), 739–754.
11.
ChowR. (1999). The politics of admission: Female sexual agency, miscegenation and the formation of community in Frantz Fanon. In AlessandriniA. (Ed.), Frantz Fanon: Critical perspectives (pp. 35–58). London, UK: Routledge.
12.
CockburnC. (2013). War and security, women and gender: An overview of the issues. Gender & Development, 21(3), 433–452.
13.
CroweK. (2015). Sexual assault and testimony: Articulation of/as violence. Law, Culture and the Humanities. Advance online publication. doi:1743872115577917
14.
DantoE. A. (2005). Freud’s free clinics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
15.
De VosJ. (2013). Psychologization and the subject of late modernity. Abingdon, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
DesaiM. U. (2014). Psychology, the psychological, and critical praxis: A phenomenologist reads Frantz Fanon. Theory & Psychology, 24, 58–75. doi:10.1177/0959354313511869
17.
DiamondI.QuinbyL. (1988). Foucault and feminism: Reflections on resistance. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
18.
EdelmanL. (2004). No future. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19.
FanonF. (1963). The wretched of the earth (FarringtonC., Trans.). London, UK: Penguin. (Original work published 1961)
20.
FanonF. (1965). A dying colonialism (ChevalierH., Trans.). New York, NY: Grove Press. (Original work published 1959)
21.
FanonF. (1970). Black skin, white masks (MarkmannC. L., Trans.). London, UK: Paladin. (Original work published 1952).
22.
FergusonK. E. (1991). Interpretation and genealogy in feminism. Signs, 16(2), 322–229.
23.
FoucaultM. (1977). Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (BouchardD., Ed.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
24.
FoucaultM. (1980). Prison talk. In GordonC. (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings: 1972–1977 (pp. 37–54). Brighton, UK: Harvester.
25.
FoucaultM. (1981). History of sexuality: Vol 1. An introduction. Harmondsworth, UK: Pelican.
26.
FoucaultM. (1983). The subject and power: Afterword. In DreyfusH.RabinowP. (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–264). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
FoucaultM. (1988). Technologies of the self. In MartinL.GutmanH.HuttonP. (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). London, UK: Tavistock.
28.
FoucaultM. (2011). The order of discourse. In ParkerI. (Ed.), Critical psychology: Critical concepts in psychology: Vol. 4. Dominant models of psychology and their limits (pp. 190–220). London, UK: Routledge. (Original work published 1970)
29.
FoulkesS. H.AnthonyE. (1957). Group psychotherapy: The psychoanalytic approach. Harmondsworth, UK: Pelican.
30.
FraserN. (1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse, and gender in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
31.
FraserN. (2003). From discipline to flexibilization? Rereading Foucault in the shadow of globalization. Constellations, 10(2), 160–171.
32.
FreireP. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed (Bergman RamosM., Trans.). New York, NY: Herder and Herder.
33.
FroshS. (2003). Psychosocial studies and psychology: Is a critical approach emerging?Human Relations, 56(12), 1545–1567.
GatesH. L. (1991). Critical Fanonism. Critical Inquiry, 17(3), 457–470.
36.
Gaztambide-FernándezR. (2010). Interruption and imagination in curriculum and pedagogy, or how to get caught inside a strange loop. Curriculum Inquiry, 40(3), 409–417.
37.
GibsonN. C. (2013). A wholly other time? Fanon, the revolutionary, and the question of organization. South Atlantic Quarterly, 112(1), 39–55.
38.
GiordanoC. (2011). Translating Fanon in the Italian context: Re-thinking the ethics of treatment in psychiatry. Transcultural Psychiatry, 48(3), 228–256. doi:10.1177/1363461511403029
39.
HaddourA. (2010). Torture unveiled: Rereading Fanon and Bourdieu in the context of May 1958. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(7–8), 66–90. doi:10.1177/0263276410383710
40.
HarawayD. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
41.
HardingS. G. (1987). Feminism and methodology: Social science issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
42.
HardingS. G. (Ed.). (2004). The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. London, UK: Psychology Press.
43.
HarrisonT. (2000). Bion, Rickman, Foulkes, and the Northfield experiments: Advancing on a different front. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
44.
HartsockN. (1990). Foucault on power: A theory for women? In NicholsonL. (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism (pp. 157–175). New York, NY: Routledge.
45.
HekmanS. J. (Ed.). (1996). Feminist interpretations of Michel Foucault. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
46.
HekmanS. (1997). Truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited. Signs, 22(2), 341–365.
47.
HekmanS. (2010). The material of knowledge: Feminist disclosures. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
48.
HolmstromL. L.BurgessA. W. (1979). Rape: The husband’s and boyfriend’s initial reactions. Family Coordinator, 28(2), 321–330.
49.
HookD. (2005). A critical psychology of the postcolonial. Theory & Psychology, 15, 475–503. doi:10.1177/0959354305054748
50.
HookD. (2012). A critical psychology of the postcolonial: The mind of apartheid. New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
JardineA. (1981). Introduction to Julia Kristeva’s “Women’s Time”. Signs, 7(1), 5–12.
52.
JonesR.PykettJ.WhiteheadM. (2013). Changing behaviours: On the rise of the psychological state. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
53.
KellerR. (2007). Clinician and revolutionary: Frantz Fanon, biography, and the history of colonial medicine. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 81(4), 823–841.
54.
KhalfaJ. (2015). Fanon and psychiatry. Nottingham French Studies, 54(1), 52–71.
55.
KhannaR. (2004). Dark continents: Psychoanalysis and colonialism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
56.
KhannaR. (2013). The lumpenproletariat, the subaltern, the mental asylum. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 112(1), 129–143.
57.
KoffmanO.GillR. (2013). The revolution will be led by a 12-year-old girl: Girl power and global biopolitics. Feminist Review, 105(1), 83–102.
LitwackS. D.BeckJ. G.SloanD. M. (2015). Group treatment for trauma-related psychological disorders. In SchnyderU.CloitreM. (Eds.), Evidence based treatments for trauma-related psychological disorders (pp. 433–448). New York, NY: Springer International.
60.
MaceyD. (2012). Frantz Fanon: A biography. London, UK: Verso.
61.
MachereyP. (2012). Figures of interpellation in Althusser and Fanon. Radical Philosophy, 173, 9–20.
62.
McCallL. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771–1800.
63.
McClintockA. (1995). Imperial leather: Race, gender, and sexuality in the colonial contest. New York, NY: Routledge.
64.
MenozziF. (2015). Fanon’s letter: Between psychiatry and anticolonial commitment. Interventions, 17(3), 360–377.
65.
MojabS. (2009). Imperialism, “post-war reconstruction” and Kurdish women’s NGOs. In Al-AliN.PrattN. (Eds.), Women and war in the Middle East: Transnational perspectives (pp. 99–128). London, UK: Zed Press.
OliverK. (2004). The colonization of psychic space: A psychoanalytic social theory of oppression. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
68.
OliverK. (2005). The good infection. Parallax, 11(3), 87–98.
69.
PainterD. (2012, August). Occupy words: Language, commodification, and the (re)-appropriation of voice. The second Marxism and psychology conference, Morelia, Mexico.
70.
PatemanC. (1988). The sexual contract. Oxford, UK: Polity.
71.
PickettB. L. (1996). Foucault and the politics of resistance. Polity, XX VIII(4), 445–466.
72.
PinarW. (2011). The character of curriculum studies. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
73.
PykettJ. (2012). The new maternal state: The gendered politics of governing through behaviour change. Antipode, 44(1), 217–238.
74.
RaifordL. (2009). Photography and the practices of critical black memory. History and Theory, 48(4), 112–129.
75.
RamazanogluС (Ed.). (1993). Up against Foucault: Explorations of some tensions between Foucault and feminism. London, UK: Routledge.
76.
RazanajaoC. L.PostelJ.AllenD. F. (1996). The life and psychiatric work of Frantz Fanon. History of Psychiatry, 7, 499–524.
77.
RobertsA. (2015). Gender, financial deepening and the production of embodied finance: Towards a critical feminist analysis. Global Society, 29(1). Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13600826.975189
78.
RowbothamS.SegalL.WainwrightH. (2013). Beyond the fragments: Feminism and the making of socialism. London, UK: Merlin Press.
79.
RoyA. (2014). Subjects of risk: Technologies of gender in the making of millennial modernity. Public Culture, 24(1), 131–155.
80.
ScheidlingerS. (1994). An overview of nine decades of group psychotherapy. Psychiatric Services, 45(3), 217–225.
81.
ScheidlingerS. (2000). The group psychotherapy movement at the millennium: Some historical perspectives. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 50(3), 315–339.
82.
ScheurichJ.McKenzieK. (2005). Foucault’s methodologies: Archaeology and genealogy. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 141–169). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
ShepherdL. J. (2008). Gender, violence and security: Discourse as practice. London, UK: Zed Books.
85.
SikuadeA. (2012). Fifty years after Frantz Fanon: Beyond diversity. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 18(1), 25–31. Retrieved from http://apt.rcpsych.org/content/18/1/25.full
86.
SpivakG. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak. In NelsonC.GrossmanL. (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 217–313). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
87.
StaudtK. (2010). Globalization and gender at border sites. In MarchantM.Sisson RunyanA. (Eds.), Gender and global restructuring: Sightings, sites and resistances (2nd ed., pp. 187–200). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
88.
StolerA. (2002). Carnal knowledge and imperial rule. Berkeley: University of California Press.
89.
ThompsonV. (2015, March). Using intersectionality? Using Marxism-Feminism?Paper presented at the conference The Strength of Critique: Trajectories of Marxism-Feminism panel, Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, Berlin, Germany.
90.
TurshenM. (2002). Algerian women in the liberation struggle and the civil war: From active participants to passive victims?Social Research, 69(3), 889–911.
91.
Van SchoorE. P. (2000). A sociohistorical view of group psychotherapy in the United States: The ideology of individualism and self-liberation. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 50(4), 437–454. doi:10.1080/00207284.2000.11491023
92.
VergèsF. (1996). The heritage of Frantz Fanon. The European Legacy, 1(3), 994–998.
93.
VergèsF. (1997). Creole skin, Black mask: Fanon and disavowal. Critical Inquiry, 23(3), 578–596.
94.
WhiteA. M. (2014). All the men are fighting for freedom, all the women are mourning their men, but some of us carried guns: A raced-gendered analysis of Fanon’s psychological perspectives on war. Signs, 40(1), 857–884.
95.
WinkerG.DegeleN. (2011). Intersectionality as multi-level analysis: Dealing with social inequality. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 18(1), 51–66.
