In this article we examine the relationship between standards and subjectivity in the context of compensating the victims of terrorism. We do so by drawing on a corpus of data that features survivor and bereaved accounts of two 21st-century terrorist attacks. We investigate the distressing period in which compensation claims remained undecided, in some cases for over seven years after the attacks, and how the process of assessment acts as a “technology of desubjectification.” To articulate this we turn to Giorgio Agamben’s notion of “undecidability” in which the ambiguity between life and law is used by governing authorities to suspend and blur key distinctions such as what lies inside or outside the juridical order. In particular we aim to clarify that, in the context of claiming compensation for an act of terrorism, being undecided is a means by which the state maintains claimants within a “holding category” of victimhood that prevents their recognition as a political subject. We conclude with some reflection on how technologies of desubjectification operate within an “age of austerity.” Critical psychology needs to update its neo-Foucauldian understanding of subjectivity to include the production of “cranked subjects.”
BossongR. (2013). The evolution of EU counter-terrorism: European security policy after 9/11. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
12.
BottiglieroI. (2012). Realizing the right to redress for victims of terrorist attacks. In de FríasA. M. S.SamuelK.WhiteN. (Eds.), Counter-terrorism: International law and practice (pp. 908–935). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
BowkerG. C.StarS. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
BowkerG. C.StarS. L. (2000). Invisible mediators of action: Classification and the ubiquity of standards. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(1–2), 147–163.
15.
BurnhamJ. (2010). Accident prone: A history of technology, psychology, and misfits of the machine age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
ButlerJ. (2009). Frames of war: When is life grievable?London, UK: Verso.
17.
BuzanB. (2003). Implications for the study of international relations. In BuckleyM.FawnR. (Eds.), Global responses to terrorism: 9/11, Afghanistan and beyond (pp. 296–309). London, UK: Routledge.
18.
CanguilhemG. (2011). What is psychology? In ParkerI. (Ed.), Critical psychology: Critical concepts in psychology: Vol. 1. Dominant models of psychology and their limits. London, UK: Routledge. (Original work published 1958)
19.
ChomskyN. (2002). Pirates and emperors, old and new: International terrorism in the real world. Boston, MA: South End Press.
20.
CloughP.WillseC. (2011). Beyond biopolitics: Essays on the governance of life and death. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
21.
ConwayB. (2010). Commemoration and Bloody Sunday: Pathways of memory. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
CoxM. (2002). American power before and after 11 September: Dizzy with success. International Affairs, 78(2), 261–276.
23.
CrombyJ.HarperD.ReaveyP. (2013). Psychology, mental health and distress. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
CrombyJ.WillisM. (2014). Nudging into subjectification: Governmentality and psychometrics. Critical Social Policy, 34(2), 241–259.
25.
DeanM. (2010). The constitution of poverty: Toward a genealogy of liberal governance. London, UK: Routledge.
26.
DeanM. (2013). The signature of power: Sovereignty, governmentality and biopolitics. London, UK: Sage.
27.
DeleuzeG. (1995). Negotiations (JoughinM., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
28.
DillonM. (2007). Governing terror: The state of emergency of biopolitical emergence. International Political Sociology, 1, 7–28.
29.
FisherJ. P.FlotaB. (2013). The politics of post-9/11 music: Sound, trauma, and the music industry in the time of terror. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
30.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (SheridanA., Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
31.
FoucaultM. (Ed.). (1978). I Pierre Riviere, having slaughtered my mother, my sister, and my brother: A case of parricide in the nineteenth century. London, UK: Penguin.
32.
FoucaultM. (1988). Hercule Barbin: Being the recently discovered memoirs of a nineteenth century hermaphrodite. New York, NY: Random House.
33.
FoucaultM. (2002). The lives of infamous men. In Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984: Vol. 3. Power (pp. 157–175). London, UK: Allen Lane.
34.
FoucaultM. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
FoucaultM. (2010). Government of self and others: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1982–83. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
GillardE. (2003). Reparations for violations of international humanitarian law. International Review of the Red Cross, 851, 529–554.
37.
GraeberD. (2011). Debt: The first 5000 years. Brooklyn, NY: First Melville House Printing.
38.
GuytonG. (1999). A brief history of workers’ compensation. Iowa Orthop Journal, 19, 106–110.
39.
HannaP. (2013). Reconceptualizing subjectivity in critical social psychology: Turning to Foucault. Theory & Psychology, 23, 657–674.
40.
HarringtonR. (2001). The railway accident: Trains, trauma, and technological crises in nineteenth-century Britain. In MicaleM. S.LernerP. (Eds.), Traumatic pasts: History, psychiatry, and trauma in the modern age, 1870–1930 (pp. 31–56). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
HenriquesJ.HollwayW.VennC.WalkerdineV.UrwinC. (1984). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation andsubjectivity. London, UK: Methuen.
42.
HoskinsA.O’LoughlinB. (2009). Television and terror: Conflicting times and the crisis of news discourse. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
43.
HoskinsA.O’LoughlinB. (2013). War and media: The emergence of diffused war. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
44.
HøjgaardL.SøndergaardD. M. (2011). Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity: Agential realism and poststructural analyses. Theory & Psychology, 21, 338–354.
45.
ImreR. (2013). Responding to terrorism: Political, philosophical and legal perspectives. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
46.
KressG. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London, UK: Routledge.
47.
KunstM.PopelierL.VarekampE. (2015). Victim satisfaction with the criminal justice system and emotional recovery: A systematic and critical review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16(3), 336–358.
48.
LaxminarayanM. (2014). Psychological effects of criminal proceedings through contact with the judge: The moderating effect of legal system structure. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(8), 781–797.
49.
Lorenzo-dusN.BryanA. (2011). Dynamics of memory: Commemorating the 2005 London bombings in British television news. Memory Studies, 4(3), 281–297.
MolA. (2008). The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. London, UK: Routledge.
53.
MussonA. (2001). Medieval law in context: The growth of legal consciousness from Magna Carta to The Peasants’ Revolt. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
54.
OrendB. (2002). Justice after war. Ethics and International Affairs, 16(1), 43–56.
55.
ParkerI. (2007). Revolution in psychology: Alienation to emancipation. London, UK: Pluto Press.
56.
ParkerI. (2014). The crisis in modern social psychology, and how to end it. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
57.
PuarJ. K. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
ReidJ. (2006). The biopolitics of the war on terror: Life struggles, liberal modernity, and the defence of logistical societies. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
RoseN. (1985). The psychological complex: Psychology, politics and society in England, 1869–1939. London, UK: Routledge.
62.
RoseN. (1989). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London, UK: Free Association Books.
63.
SilkM. (2013). The cultural politics of post-9/11 American sport: Power, pedagogy and the popular. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis.
64.
SimonL. M. J. (1995). A therapeutic jurisprudence approach to the legal processing of domestic violence cases. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 1(1), 43–79.
65.
TerranovaT. (2009). Another life: The nature of political economy in Foucault’s genealogy of biopolitics. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(6), 234–262.
United Nations (UN). (2011). The criminal justice response to support victims of acts of terrorism. New York, NY: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
68.
VäliahoP. (2014). Biopolitical screens: Image, power, and the neoliberal brain. London, UK: MIT Press.
69.
WalkerC. (2011). Terrorism and the law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
70.
WalklateS.MythenG.McGarryR. (2015). “When you see the lipstick kisses …” - military repatriation, public mourning and the politics of respect. Palgrave Communications, 1, 1–9.
71.
WexlerD. B.WinickB. (1996). Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
72.
WilliamsK. (2005). State of fear: Britain’s compensation culture reviewed. Legal Studies, 25, 499–515.
73.
WilligC. (1999). Applied discourse analysis: Social and psychological interventions. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
74.
WooffittR. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: A comparative and critical introduction. London, UK: Sage.
75.
WoolgarS.NeylandD. (2013). Mundane governance: Ontology and accountability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
