Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2016-4
Standards and (self)implosion: How the circulation of affects accelerates the spread of standards and intensifies the embodiment of colliding,temporal ontologies
Standards constitute an interesting phenomenon in discussions on emotional circulation and subjectivities. Because standards travel. And they are usually on a mission: to standardize policies or products and consequently also those who are administered by them or consume them. Literature on the spread of standards often tends to conceptualize the traveling of standards as contagious processes resulting in epidemic spreads. In this article, the metaphor of epidemic spread is replaced by an analytical configuration of a new mode of educational governance in which orchestrating webs of incentives and anticipations is a major driver. International standards are propelled by material–affective infrastructures and the embodied interpretations that educational agents and organizations make of them. The article displays how standards make organizations and selves implode and how the impact of standardizing processes and colliding temporal ontologies is embodied in mid-level managers’ collapse between anticipatory and nauseating affects.
AhmedS. (2004a). Affective economies. Social Text 79, 22(2), 117–139.
2.
AhmedS. (2004b). The cultural politics of emotions. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
3.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
BeckerG. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1964)
5.
BjergH.StaunæsD. (2011). Self-management through shame: Uniting governmentality studies and the “Affective Turn”. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organizations, 11(2), 138–156.
6.
BlackmanL. (2007a). Feeling F.I.N.E: Social psychology, suggestion and the problem of social influence. International Journal of Critical Psychology, 21, 23–49.
7.
BlackmanL. (2007b). Reinventing psychological matters: The importance of the suggestive realm of Tarde’s ontology. Economy and Society, 36(4), 574–596.
8.
BlackmanL. (2007–2008). Is happiness contagious?New Formations, 63, 15–32.
BowkerG. C.StarS. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.
11.
BrunssonN.JacobssonB. (2000). A world of standards. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12.
BrøggerK. (2014). The ghosts of higher education reform: On the organisational processes surrounding policy borrowing. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 12(4), 520–541.
13.
BrøggerK. (2016). The rule of mimetic desire in higher education: Governing through naming, shaming and faming. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(1), 72–91.
14.
BuschL. (2000). The moral economy of grades and standards. Journal of Rural Studies, 16, 273–283.
15.
BuschL. (2011). Standards: Recipes for realities. Boston, MA: The MIT Press.
16.
CortP. (2010). Stating the obvious: The European qualifications framework is not a neutral evidence-based policy tool. European Educational Research Journal, 9(3), 304–316.
17.
CzempielE.-O. (1992). Governance and democratization. In RosenauJ. N.CzempielE.-O. (Eds.), Governance without government: Order and change in world politics (pp. 250–270). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
DaleR. (2004). Forms of governance, governmentality and the EU’s open method of coordination. In LarnerW.WaltersW. (Eds.), Global governmentality (pp. 174–194). New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
DaleR. (2009). Studying globalisation in education: Lisbon, the open method of coordination and beyond. In DaleR.RobertsonS. (Eds.), Globalisation and Europeanisation in education (pp. 121–140). Oxford, UK: Symposium Books.
20.
DerridaJ. (1985). The ear of the other. New York, NY: Schocken Books.
21.
DunnE. C. (2009). Standards without infrastructure. In LamplandM.StarS. L. (Eds.), Standards and their stories: How quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday life (pp. 118–121). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
22.
GirardR. (1966). Deceit, desire and the novel: Self and other in literary structure. London, UK: Johns Hopkins University Press.
GuyerJ. (2007). Prophecy and the near future: Thoughts on macroeconomic, evangelical, and punctuated time. American Ethnologist, 34(3), 409–421.
25.
HigginsV.LarnerW. (Eds.). (2010). Calculating the social: Standards and the reconfiguration of governing. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
KarsethB. (2008). Qualifications frameworks for the European higher education area: A new instrumentalism or “much ado about nothing”?Utbildning & Demokrati, 17(2), 51–72.
27.
LamplandM.StarS. L. (Eds.). (2009). Standards and their stories: How quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday life. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
28.
LascoumesP.GalesP. L. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 20(1), 1–21.
29.
LawnM. (2011). Standardizing the European education policy space. European Educational Research Journal, 10(2), 259–272.
30.
LawnM.GrekS. (2012). Europeanizing education: Governing a new policy space. Oxford, UK: Symposium Books.
31.
LingardB.SellarS. (2013). “Catalyst data”: Perverse systemic effects of audit and accountability in Australian schooling. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 634–656.
32.
MassumiB. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
33.
MassumiB. (2005). Fear (the spectrum said). Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique, 13(1), 31–48.
34.
MillerP.RoseN. (2008). Governing the present. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
35.
MiyazakiH. (2003). The temporalities of the market. American Anthropologist, 105(2), 255–265.
36.
MolA. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
37.
MolA. (2012). Mind your plate! The ontonorms of Dutch dieting. Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 379–396.
38.
ProbynE. (2005). Blush: Faces of shame. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
39.
RaffnsøeS.StaunæsD. (2014). Learning to stay ahead of time: Moving leadership experiences experimentally. Management & Organizational History, 9(2), 1–19.
40.
RavinetP. (2008). From voluntary participation to monitored coordination: Why European countries feel increasingly bound by their commitment to the Bologna process. European Journal of Education, 43(3), 353–367.
41.
RoseN. (1991). Governing by numbers: Figuring out democracy. Accounting Organizations and Society, 16(7), 673–692.
42.
RosenauJ. N. (1992). Governance, order, and change in world politics. In RosenauJ. N.CzempielE.-O. (Eds.), Governance without government: Order and change in world politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43.
SedgwickE. K.FrankA. (1995). SHAME and its sister: A Silvan Tomkins reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
44.
SimonsM. (2014). Governing education without reform: The power of the example. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(5), 712–731.
45.
StarS. L.BowkerG. C. (2006). How to infrastructure? In LievrouwL. A.LivingstoneS. (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and social consequences of ICTs. London, UK: Sage.
46.
StaunæsD.PorsJ. G. (2015). Thinking educational policy and management through (frictional) concepts of affects. In ClarkeM.GulsonK. N.PetersenE. B. (Eds.), Education policy, research and theories of the present (pp. 99–109). London, UK: Routledge.
47.
Steiner-KhamsiG. (2012). Understanding policy borrowing and lending: Building comparative policy studies. In Steiner-KhamsiG.WaldowF. (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2012: Policy borrowing and lending in education (pp. 3–17). New York, NY: Routledge.
48.
StrathdeeR. (2011). The implementation, evolution and impact of New Zealand’s national qualifications framework. Journal of Education and Work, 24(3–4), 303–321.
49.
SvennilsonI. (1962). Policy conference on economic growth and investment in education: Washington 16–20 October, 1961. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
50.
Tamm HallströmK. (2004). Organizing international standardization: ISO and the IASC in quest of authority. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
