The article addresses Daniel Robinson’s claim that the term, “modern psychology” is vague and imprecise. It points out that there is general agreement that the modern period of history begins no later than 1500 and that any psychology that existed after this date can be legitimately described as “modern.” It also suggests that the qualifier, “modern” is superfluous since there was no psychology prior to 1500.
BlumenthalA. L. (1975). A reappraisal of Wilhelm Wundt. American Psychologist, 30, 1081–1088.
2.
BoringE. G. (1929). A history of experimental psychology. New York, NY: Appleton Century.
3.
BoringE. G. (1950). A history of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
4.
DanzigerK. (1979). The positivist repudiation of Wundt. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 15, 205–230.
5.
DanzigerK. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London, UK: Sage.
6.
FurumotoL. (1989). The new history of psychology. In CohenI. S. (Ed.), The G. Stanley Hall lecture series (Vol. 9, pp. 5–34). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
History. (n.d.). OED Online. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com
9.
MengalP. (2005). La naissance de la psychologie [The birth of psychology]. Paris, France: L’Harmattan.
10.
Modern English. (n.d.). OED Online. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com
11.
Modern Latin. (n.d.). OED Online. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com
12.
NanceR. D. (1962). Current practices in teaching history of psychology. American Psychologist, 17, 250.
13.
RichardsG. (2010). Putting psychology in its place: Critical historical perspectives (3rd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
14.
RobinsonD. N. (2013). Historiography in psychology: A note on ignorance. Theory & Psychology, 23, 819–828. doi: 10.1177/0959354313499426
15.
SmithR. (1988). Does the history of psychology have a subject?History of the Human Sciences, 1, 147–177.
16.
SmithR. (2009). The birth of psychology [Review of the books The birth of psychology, by MengalP. and The sciences of the soul, 16th-18th centuries, by VidalF.]. History of the Human Sciences, 22, 134–144.
17.
VidalF. (2006). Les sciences de l’âme XVIe-XVIIIe siècle [The sciences of the soul, 16th–18th centuries]. Paris, France: Honoré Champion.
18.
VidalF. (2011). The sciences of the soul: The early modern origins of psychology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
