Assuming a performative notion of language, this contribution addresses how language functions as a symbolic means and asks for its function for the dialogical self. In accordance with a non-individualistic notion, individuals are related to each other within and by virtue of an in-between. This in-between is called “spacetime of language”: a dynamic evolving across time, perceived as linguistic forms with their chronotopology and the positionings of the performers (self as-whom to other as-whom). With respect to the linguistic forms, the specificity of language functioning is described by Bühler’s term of displacement. The effect of displacement is to generate sharedness by inducing a movement the partners follow, going beyond their actual, sensitive contact. Symbolic displacement, expanding Bühler’s notion, is particularly interesting with regard to the dialogical self: it permits the social construction of several perspectives on self, other, and reality—positions and voices informing the self’s performances.
BertauM.-C. (2007). Encountering objects and others as a means of passage. Culture & Psychology, 13(3), 335–352.
2.
BertauM.-C. (2008). Voice: A pathway to consciousness as “social contact to oneself.”Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42(1), 92–113.
3.
BertauM.-C. (2011a). Anreden, Erwidern, Verstehen. Elemente einer Psycholinguistik der Alterität [Address, reply, understanding. Elements of a psycholinguistics of alterity]. Berlin, Germany: Lehmanns Media.
4.
BertauM.-C. (2011b). Language for the other: Constructing cultural-historical psycholinguistics. Tätigkeitstheorie – E-journal for Activity Theoretical Research in Germany, 5, 13–49. Retrieved from http://psyjournals.ru/en/tatigkeitstheorie/2011/n5/52792.shtml
5.
BertauM.-C. (2012a). Developmental origins of the dialogical self: Early childhood years. In HermansH. J. M.GieserT. (Eds.), Handbook of dialogical self theory (pp. 64–81). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BertauM.-C. (2012b). Exploring voice: A psycholinguist’s inquiry into the dynamic materiality of language. In BertauM.-C.GonçalvesM. M.RaggattP. T. F. (Eds.), Dialogic formations: Investigations into the origins and development of the dialogical self (pp. 41–68). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
7.
BertauM.-C. (in press-a). Inner form as a notion migrating from west to east: Acknowledging the Humboldtian tradition in cultural-historical psychology. In YasnitskyA.Van der VeerR.FerrariM. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural-historical theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BertauM.-C. (in press-b). The need for a dialogic science. In YasnitskyA.Van der VeerR.FerrariM. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural-historical theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BertauM.-C.GonçalvesM. M.RaggattP. T. F. (Eds.). (2012). Dialogic formations: Investigations into the origins and development of the dialogical self. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
10.
BrunerJ. S. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language, 2, 1–19.
11.
BrunerJ. S. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. New York, NY: Norton.
12.
BuchheimT. (1989). Gorgias von Leontinoi: Reden, Fragmente, Testimonien. Griechisch–deutsch [Gorgias from Leontinoi: Orations, fragments, testimonies. Greek–German]. Hamburg, Germany: Meiner.
13.
BühlerK. (1927). Die Krise der Psychologie [The crisis in psychology]. Jena, Germany: Gustav Fischer.
14.
BühlerK. (1982). Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache [Theory of language: The representational function of language]. Stuttgart, Germany: Gustav Fischer. (Original work published 1934)
15.
BühlerK. (2011). Theory of language: The representational function of language. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. (Original work published 1934)
16.
De JaegherH.Di PaoloE. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenological and Cognitive Science, 6, 485–507.
17.
de LemosC. (2000). Questioning the notion of development: The case of language acquisition. Culture & Psychology, 6(2), 169–182.
18.
FriedrichJ. (2009). Présentation [Presentation]. In BühlerK., Théorie du langage [Theory of language] (SamainD.FriedrichJ., Eds. & Trans., pp. 21–58). Marseille, France: Agone.
19.
GillespieA.MartinJ. (2014). Position exchange theory: A socio-material basis for discursive and psychological positioning. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 73–79.
20.
GratierM.BertauM.-C. (2012). Polyphony: A vivid source of self and symbol. In BertauM.-C.GonçalvesM. M.RaggattP. T. F. (Eds.), Dialogic formations: Investigations into the origins of the dialogical self (pp. 85–119). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
21.
HermansH. J. M.GieserT. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of dialogical self theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
HoltE.CliftR. (Eds.). (2007). Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
HörmannH. (1976). Meinen und Verstehen [Meaning and understanding]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
24.
HumboldtW., von. (1830–35/1907). Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluß auf die geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts [On language: On the diversity of human language construction and its influence on the mental development of the human species]. In LeitzmannA. (Ed.), Wilhelm von Humboldts Werke, Siebenter Band, 1. Hälfte [The works of Wilhelm von Humboldt: Vol. 7]. Berlin, Germany: B. Behr’s.
25.
HumboldtW., von. (1999). On Language: On the diversity of human language construction and its influence on the mental development of the human species (LonsonskyM. Ed., HeathP., Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
KarstenA. (2012). Schreiben im Blick: Schriftliche Formen der sprachlichen Tätigkeit aus dialogischer Perspektive [Writing in focus: A dialogical perspective on written forms of speech] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München.
27.
KarstenA. (2014). Writing: Movements of the self. Theory & Psychology, 24, 479–503.
28.
KeilerP. (2002). Lev Vygotskij – ein Leben für die Psychologie [Lev Vygotsky – A life for psychology]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
29.
KeilerP. (2012). “Cultural-historical theory” and “cultural-historical school”: From myth (back) to reality. PsyAnima, Dubna Psychological Journal, 1, 11–33.
30.
LiebrucksB. (1965). Sprache und Bewußtsein: Band 2. Sprache. “Wilhelm von Humboldt” [Language and consciousness: Vol. 2. Language. “Wilhelm von Humboldt”]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
31.
LinellP. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
32.
LyraM. C. D.P. (2012). Self and symbol emerging from dialogical dynamics. In BertauM.-C.GonçalvesM. M.RaggattP. T. F. (Eds.), Dialogic formations: Investigations into the origins of the dialogical self (pp. 121–143). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
33.
SchützA. (1971). Gesammelte Aufsätze: 1. das Problem der sozialen Wirklichkeit [Collected pieces: 1. The problem of social reality]. Den Haag, the Netherlands: Martnus Nijhoff.
34.
SeifridT. (2005). The world made self: Russian writings on language, 1860–1930. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
35.
SinhaC. (2007). Cognitive linguistics, psychology, and cognitive science. In GeeraertsD.CuyckensH. (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 1266–1294). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
SinhaC. (2012). (Dis-)continuity, (inter-)corporeality and conventionality in dialogical development. Commentary on Gratier & Bertau and Lyra. In BertauM.-C.GonçalvesM. M.RaggattP. T. F. (Eds.), Dialogic formations. Investigations into the origins of the dialogical self (pp. 145–153). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
37.
SinhaC.RodriguezC. (2008). Language and the signifying object: From convention to imagination. In ZlatevJ.RacineT. P.SinhaC.ItkonenE. (Eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (pp. 357–378). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
38.
TannenD. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
ValsinerJ. (2007). Becoming integrative in sciences: Re-building contemporary psychology through interdisciplinary and international collaboration. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, 41, 1–5.
41.
VološinovV. N. (1983). Discourse in life and discourse in poetry (RichmondJ., Trans.). In ShukmannA. (Ed.), Bakhtin school papers (pp. 5–29). Oxford, UK: Holdan Books. (Original work published 1926)
42.
VološinovV. N. (1986). Marxism and the philosophy of language (MatejkaL.TitunikR., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1929)
43.
VygotskyL. S. (1967). Play and its role in the development of the child. Soviet Psychology, 3, 62–76. (Original work published 1933)
44.
VygotskyL. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In RieberR. W.CartonA. S. (Eds.), The collected works of Vygotsky, Problems of general psychology (Vol. 1; pp. 37–285). New York, NY: Plenum. (Original work published 1934)
45.
VygotskyL. S. (1997). The problem of the development of higher mental functions. In RieberR. W. (Ed.), The collected works of Vygotsky (Vol. 4; pp. 1–26). New York, NY: Plenum. (Original work published 1931)
46.
WeigandE. (2009). Language as dialogue. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
47.
WertschJ. V. (1993). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
YasnitskyA. (2011). Vygotsky circle as a personal network of scholars: Restoring connections between people and ideas. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, 45, 422–457.
49.
ZittounT. (2006). Transitions: Development through symbolic resources. Greenwich, UK: Information Age Publishing.
