Based on a wider research project which critiqued the centricity of cognitivism in research investigating children’s drawings this article explores the relationship between social interaction and materiality. Case studies are presented to systematically analyse a range of naturalistic data collected from art classes held in two Staffordshire primary schools. Use of a multi-level analysis demonstrates the ways in which materiality (space, tools, and materials) work as enabling constraints which shape discursive interaction. Concurrently, photographs of artwork created in the lesson examine how interaction guides the creation of material objects—child art. The analysis demonstrates that the creation of child art is not an individual endeavour and questions the assumption that artwork is a mirror to the child’s mind. Instead, it is inextricably bound to the discursive and material contexts it is created in. Thus, ethnography is presented as a useful tool for examining interactions between discursive and material practices.
Baker-SennettJ.MatusovE.RogoffB. (1992). Sociocultural processes of creative planning in children’s playcrafting. In LightP.ButterworthG. (Eds.), Context and cognition: Ways of learning and knowing (pp. 93–114). Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
2.
BhaskarR. (1979). The possibility of naturalism. New York, NY: Humanities Press.
3.
CarterB.NewC. (2004). Making realism work: Realist social theory and empirical research. New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
CoatesE.CoatesA. (2006). Young children talking and drawing. International Journal of Early Years Education, 14(3), 221–241.
5.
CoxM. (1993). Children’s drawings of the human figure. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6.
CoxS. (2005). Intention and meaning in young children’s drawing. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 24(2), 115–125.
7.
CrombyJ.HarperD. J. (2009). Paranoia: A social account. Theory & Psychology, 19, 335–361. doi: 10.1177/0959354309104158
8.
EdwardsD. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London, UK: Sage.
9.
EdwardsD.MiddletonD. J. (1986). Joint remembering: Constructing an account of shared experience through conversational discourse. Discourse Processes, 9(4), 423–459.
FieldingN. (1993). Ethnography. In GilbertN. (Ed.), Researching social life (pp. 145–163). London, UK: Sage.
12.
FoxT. J.ThomasG. V. (1990). Children’s drawings of an anxiety-eliciting topic: Effects on the size of the drawing. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29, 71–81.
13.
HallamJ.Das GuptaM.LeeH. (2008). An exploration of primary school teachers’ understanding of art and the place of art in the primary school curriculum. Curriculum Journal, 19(4), 269–281.
14.
HallamJ.Das GuptaM.LeeH. (2011). Shaping children’s artwork in English primary classes: Insights from teacher–child interaction during art activities. International Journal of Early Years Education, 19(3–4), 193–205. doi:10.1080/09669760.2011.629489
15.
HallamJ.LeeH.Das GuptaM. (2007). An analysis of the presentation of art in the British primary school curriculum and its implications for teaching. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 26(2), 206–214.
16.
HallamJ.LeeH.Das GuptaM. (2011). An investigation into the ways in which art is taught in English reception classes. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(2), 177–185.
17.
HallamJ. L.LeeH. A. N.Das GuptaM. (2012). Multiple interpretations of child art—the importance of context and perspective. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 185–193. doi: 10.1037/a0025793
18.
HarréR.BhaskarR. (2005). How to change reality: Story vs structure—A debate between Rom Harré and Roy Bhaskar. In LopezJ.PotterG. (Eds.), After postmodernism: An introduction to critical realism (pp. 22–39). London, UK: Continuum.
19.
HarrisD. (1963). Children’s drawings as measures of intellectual maturity. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
20.
HowardC.DaviesP. (2013). Attracting mature students into higher education: The impact of approaches to learning and social identity. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 37(6), 769–785. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2012.684038
21.
KaposiD. (2013). The crooked timber of identity: Integrating discursive, critical and psychosocial analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(2), 205–395. doi: 10.1111/j.2044–8309.2011.02074.x
22.
KoppitzE. (1968). Psychological evaluation of children’s human figure drawing. London, UK: Grune and Stratton.
23.
KoppitzE. (1984). Psychological evaluation of human figure drawings by middle school pupils. London, UK: Gune & Stratton.
24.
LaclauE. (1993). Politics and the limits of modernity. In DochertyD. (Ed.), Postmodernism: A reader (pp. 329–343). Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harverster Wheatsheaf.
25.
LaclauE.MouffeC. (1987). Post-Marxism without apologies. New Left Review, 166, 79–106.
26.
MachoverK. (1949). Personality projection in the drawings of the human figure. Springfield, IL: CC Thomas.
27.
MartinJ.SugarmanJ. (1999). The psychology of human possibility and constraint. Albany: State University of New York Press.
28.
MatthewsJ. (1999). Drawing and painting: Children and visual representation (2nd ed.). London, UK: Paul Chapman.
29.
MatthewsJ. (2003). The art of childhood and adolescence: The construction of meaning. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
SchegloffE. (1997). Whose text? Whose context?Discourse and Society, 8(2) 165–187.
36.
SechrestL.WallaceM. (1964). Figure drawings and naturally occurring events and elimination of the expansive euphoria hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 42–44.
37.
SilverR. (1978). Developing cognitive and creative skills through art. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
38.
SilverR. (1988). Draw a story. New York, NY: Ablin Press.
39.
SilverR. (1993). Draw a story (rev. ed.). New York, NY: Ablin Press.
40.
Sims-SchoutenW.RileyS. C. E.WilligC. (2007). Critical realism in discourse analysis: A presentation of a systematic method of analysis using young women’s talk of motherhood, child care and female employment as an example. Theory & Psychology, 17(1), 101–124. doi: 10.1177/0959354307073153
41.
StetsenkoA.ArievitchI. M. (2004). The self in cultural-historical activity theory: Reclaiming the unity of social and individual dimensions of human development. Theory & Psychology, 14(4), 475–503. doi: 10.1177/0959354304044921
42.
StokoeE.HepburnA. (2005). “You can hear a lot through the walls”: Noise formulations in neighbour complaints. Discourse and Society, 16, 647–673. doi: 10.1177/0957926505054940
43.
StoppardJ. M. (1998). Dis-ordering depression in women: Toward a materialist-discursive account. Theory & Psychology, 8, 79–99. doi: 10.1177/0959354398081005
44.
ThomasG.ChaigneE.FoxT. (1989). Children’s drawings of topics differing in significance: Effects on size of drawing, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 321–331.
45.
ThompsonC. (2000). Drawing together: Peer influence in preschool-kindergarten art classes. Visual Arts Research, 25(2), 61–68.
46.
WetherellM. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9(3), 387–412. doi: 10.1177/0957926598009003005
47.
WetherellM. (2001). Debates in discourse research. In WetherellM.TaylorS.YatesS. (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 380–399). London, UK: Sage.
48.
WigginsS.PotterJ. (2003). Attitudes and evaluative practices: Category vs. item and subjective vs. objective constructions in everyday food assessments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 513–531.
49.
WilligC. (1999). Beyond appearances: A critical realist approach to social constructionist work. In NightingaleD. J.CrombyJ. (Eds.), Social constructionist psychology: A critical analysis of theory and practice (pp. 37–52). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
50.
WilsonA. (1993, September). Children’s drawings more than just pretty pictures?Top Santé Health and Beauty, 36–39.
51.
WooffittR. (2001). A socially organised basis for displays of cognition: Procedural orientation to evidential turns in psychic-sitter interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 545–563.
52.
YardleyL. (1996). Reconciling discursive and material perspectives on health and illness: A reconstruction of the biopsychosocial approach. Theory & Psychology, 6, 485–508. doi: 10.1177/0959354396063008
