Semantic verbal fluency (SVF), a psychological assessment method used in experimental research and clinical practice, requires participants to produce as many words as possible from a given superordinate category (e.g., “animals,” “vehicles”). Features of responses, such as the prototypicality and ordering of items, are then interpreted as if revealing details about the organisation—or, in instances of ostensibly atypical performance, disorganisation—of participants’ underlying conceptual and/or semantic systems. In this paper, we draw upon perspectives from Discursive Psychology, particularly the work of Derek Edwards (e.g., Edwards, 1997), to argue against this position. Following critical discussion of SVF’s strongly cognitivist theoretical foundations, we present analyses of social interactions across various contexts, including the real-life administration of the paradigm with a child with autism, to suggest that performance is unavoidably socially mediated rather than solely internally driven. Our arguments challenge SVF’s validity and its role in the description of “cognitive disorder.”
AntakiC.RapleyM. (1996). “Quality of life” talk: The liberal paradox of psychological testing. Discourse and Society, 7, 293–316.
2.
ArdillaA.Ostrosky-SolisF.BernalB. (2006). Cognitive testing toward the future: The example of semantic verbal fluency (animals). International Journal of Psychology, 41, 324–332.
3.
AtkinsonJ. M. (1984). Our masters’ voices: The language and the body language of politics. London, UK: Metheun.
4.
BarsalouL. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 211–227.
5.
BarsalouL. W. (1991). Deriving categories to achieve goals. In BowerG. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 27, pp. 1–64). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6.
BilmesJ. (2009). Taxonomies are for talking: Reanalyzing a Sacks classic. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(8), 1600–1610.
7.
BodyR.MuskettT. (2013). Pandas and penguins, monkeys and caterpillars: Problems of cluster analysis in semantic verbal fluency. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 10(1), 28–41.
8.
BoucherJ. (1988). Word fluency in high-functioning autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 637–645.
9.
CostafredaS. G.FuC. H. Y.PicchioniM.ToupoulouT.McDonaldC.KravaritiE.McGuireP. K. (2011). Pattern of neural responses to verbal fluency shows diagnostic specificity for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. BMC Psychiatry, 11, 18. doi: 10.1186/1471–244X-11–18
10.
DanforthS. (2002). New words for new purposes: A challenge for the AAMR. Mental Retardation, 40, 51–55.
11.
DunnM. A.BatesJ. C. (2005). Developmental change in neutral processing of words by children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35, 361–376.
12.
DunnM.GomesH.SebastianM. (1996). Prototypicality of responses of autistic, language disordered, and normal children in a word fluency task. Child Neuropsychology, 2, 99–108.
13.
DunnM.VaughanH.KreuzerJ.KurtzbergD. (1999). Electrophysiological correlates of semantic classification in autistic and normal children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 16, 79–99.
14.
EdwardsD. (1991). Categories are for talking – On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization. Theory & Psychology, 1, 515–542.
15.
EdwardsD. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London, UK: Sage.
16.
EdwardsD.PotterJ. (2005). Discursive psychology, mental states and descriptions. In te MolderH.PotterJ. (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 241–259). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
GlennP. J. (1995). Laughing at and laughing with: Negotiations of participant alignments through conversational laughter. In ten HaveP.PsathasG. (Eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp. 43–56). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
18.
HepburnA.WigginsS. (Eds.). (2007). Discursive research in practice: New approaches to psychology and interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
JeffersonG. (1991). List construction as a task and resource. In PsathasG. (Ed.), Interaction competence (pp. 63–91). New York, NY: Irvington.
20.
LakoffG. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
MarlaireC. L.MaynardD.W. (1990). Standardised testing as an interactional phenomenon. Sociology of Education, 63, 83–101.
22.
MaynardD.MarlaireC. (1992). Good reasons for bad testing performance: The interactional substrate of educational testing. Qualitative Sociology, 15, 177–202.
23.
McCleeryJ. P.CeponieneR.BurnerK. M.TownsendJ.KinnearM.SchreibmanL. (2010). Neural correlates of verbal and nonverbal semantic integration in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(3), 277–286.
24.
RapleyM. (2004). The social construction of intellectual disability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
RoschE. (1978). Principles of categorization. In RoschE.LloydB. (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
RoschE. (1999). Reclaiming concepts. In NunezR.FreemanW. J. (Eds.), Reclaiming cognition: The primacy of action, intention and emotion (pp. 61–79). Thorverton, UK: Imprint Academic.
27.
SacksH. (1984). On doing “being ordinary”. In AtkinsonJ. M.HeritageJ. (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 413–429). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
ShakespeareP. (1998). Aspects of confused speech: A study of verbal interaction between confused and normal speakers. London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29.
SumiyoshiC.SumiyoshiT.NoharaS.YamashitaI.MatsuiM.KurachiM.NiwaS. (2005). Disorganization of semantic memory underlies alogia in schizophrenia: An analysis of verbal fluency performance in Japanese subjects. Schizophrenia Research, 74(1), 91–100.
30.
TroyerA. K.MoscovitchM.WinocurG. (1997). Clustering and switching as two components of verbal fluency: Evidence from younger and older healthy adults. Neuropsychology, 11(1), 138–146.
31.
UyedaK. M.MandlerG. (1980). Prototypicality norms for 28 semantic categories. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 12, 587–595.
32.
VoldenJ.LordC. (1991). Neologisms and idiosyncratic language in autistic speakers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 21, 109–130.
