This paper argues for a shift in the grounding of psychology from discourse to a “groundless ground” rooted in an ethically sensitive, within-person, and moment-to-moment embodied awareness. It offers a critique of discursive and rhetorical psychology commensurate with “affective turn” studies and develops an approach based in the practice of mindfulness meditation. This orientation enables the participant-researcher to come into experiential contact with a domain of pre-subjectivity not often addressed by discursive approaches. It also considers parallels between discursive constructionism and Buddhist mindfulness and shows how mindfulness is relationally and rhetorically organized as a social practice.
BarnesR.MossD. (2008). Birdsongs and footprints: Tangibility and intangibility in a mindfulness research project. Reflective Practice, 9, 11–22.
3.
BatchelorS. (2010). Confession of a Buddhist atheist. London, UK: Random House.
4.
BentzV. M.ShapiroJ. J. (1998). Mindful inquiry in social research. London, UK: Sage.
5.
BilligM. (1996). Arguing and thinking (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BilligM. (1999a). Commodity fetishism and repression: Reflections on Marx, Freud, and the psychology of consumer capitalism. Theory & Psychology, 9, 313–329.
7.
BilligM. (1999b). Freudian repression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BilligM. (2012). Abraham Tucker as an 18th-century William James: Stream of consciousness, role of examples, and the importance of writing. Theory & Psychology, 22, 114–129.
9.
BlackmanL.CrombyJ. (2007). Affect and feeling. International Journal of Critical Psychology, 21, 5–22.
10.
BranneyP. (2008). Subjectivity, not personality: Combining discourse analysis and psychoanalysis. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 574–590.
BrownS.D.StennerP. (2010). Psychology without foundations. London, UK: Sage.
13.
ClayE. R. (1882). The alternative. Oxford. UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
CorcoranT. (2009). Second nature. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 375–388.
15.
CsordasT. J. (1990). Embodiment as a paradigm for anthropology. Ethos, 18, 5–47.
16.
DeprazN.VarelaF. J.VermerschP. (2003). On becoming aware: A pragmatics of experiencing. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
17.
DurrheimK. (2011). Discourse, action, rhetoric: From a perception to an action paradigm in social psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 456–462. doi: 10.1111/j.2044–8309.2011.02045.x
18.
EagletonT. (1991). Ideology: An introduction. London, UK: Verso.
19.
EdleyN. (2006). Never the twain shall meet: A critical appraisal of the combination of discourse and psychoanalytic theory in studies of men and masculinity. Sex Roles, 55, 601–608.
20.
EdwardsD. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London, UK: Sage.
21.
EpsteinD. (1996). Thoughts without a thinker. London, UK: Duckworth.
22.
FrommE. (1960). Psychoanalysis and Zen Buddhism. In FrommE.SuzukiD. T.de MartinoR. (Eds.), Zen Buddhism and psychoanalysis (pp. 77–141). London, UK: Souvenir Press.
23.
GendlinE. T. (1978). Focusing. London, UK: Random House.
24.
GergenK. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
GergenK. J.HoskingD. M. (2006). If you meet the social construction along the road: A dialogue with Buddhism. In KweeM.GergenK. J.KoshikawaF. (Eds.), Horizons in Buddhist psychology (pp. 299–314). Chagrin Falls, OH: Taos Institute.
26.
GombrichR. F. (1996). How Buddhism began. London, UK: Routledge.
27.
HarréR.GillettG. (1994). The discursive mind. London, UK: Sage.
28.
HartW. (1987). The art of living. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
29.
HollwayW.JeffersonT. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently. London, UK: Sage.
30.
JamesW. (1890). The principles of psychology (2 vols.). London, UK: Macmillan & Co.
31.
Kabat-ZinnJ. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology, 10, 144–156.
LoyD. (2003). The great awakening. Boston, MA: Wisdom.
35.
MadillA.DohertyK. (1994). “So you did what you wanted then”: Discourse analysis, personal agency, and psychotherapy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 4, 261–273.
36.
McMahanD. L. (2008). The making of Buddhist modernism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37.
MooreR. J. (1995). Dereification in Zen Buddhism. The Sociological Quarterly, 36, 699–723.
PotterJ. (2011). Re-reading Discourse and social psychology: Transforming social psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 436–455. doi: 10.1111/j.2044–8309.2011.02085.x
45.
PrestonD. L. (1988). The social organization of Zen practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
RortyR. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48.
SeamonD.ZajoncA. (Eds.). (1998). Goethe’s way of science: A phenomenology of nature. New York, NY: SUNY Press.
49.
SharfR. H. (1995). Buddhist modernism and the rhetoric of meditative experience. Numen, 42, 228–283.
50.
SharfR. H. (2000). The rhetoric of experience and the study of religion. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7, 267–287.
51.
ShotterJ. (1997). Textual violence in academe: On writing with respect for one’s others. In HuspekM.RadfordG. P. (Eds.), Transgressing discourses (pp. 17–46). New York, NY: SUNY Press.
52.
ShotterJ. (2011). Embodiment, abduction, and expressive movement: A new realm of inquiry?Theory & Psychology, 21, 439–456.
53.
ShustermanR. (2008). Body consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Stainton-RogersW. (2011). Social psychology. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
55.
StanleyS. (2004). Doctoral dilemmas: Towards a discursive psychology of postgraduate education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Loughborough University, UK.
56.
StanleyS. (2012a). Intimate distances: William James’ introspection, Buddhist mindfulness, and experiential inquiry. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 201–211.
57.
StanleyS. (2012b). Mindfulness: Towards a critical relational perspective. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 631–641.
58.
StanleyS. (in press a). Meditation. In TeoT. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology. New York, NY: Springer
59.
StanleyS. (in press b). Mindfulness. In TeoT. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology. New York, NY: Springer.
60.
StanleyS.BilligM. (2004). Dilemmas of storytelling and identity. In DaiuteC.LightfootC. (Eds.), Narrative analysis (pp. 159–176). London, UK: Sage.
61.
StokoeE.HepburnA.AntakiC. (2012). Beware the “Loughborough School” of social psychology? Interaction and the politics of intervention. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 486–496. doi: 10.1111/j.2044–8309.2011.02088.x
62.
van DijkT. A. (2011), A note on epistemics and discourse analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 478–485. doi: 10.1111/j.2044–8309.2011.02044.x
63.
VarelaF. J.ShearJ. (Eds.). (1999). The view from within. Thorverton, UK: Imprint Academic.
64.
VarelaF. J.ThompsonE. T.RoschE. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65.
VološinovV. N. (1976). Freudianism: A Marxist critique. London, UK: Academic Press.
66.
WallaceB. A. (2000). The taboo of subjectivity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
67.
WatsonR. (1998). Ethnomethodology, consciousness and self. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 5, 202–223.
68.
WetherellM. (2012). Affect and emotion. London, UK: Sage.
