This article is a critical review of mainstream psychological theory on heteronormative “Western” coupledom from the 1930s, focusing on the ideological notion of stability as a foundation for successful romantic partnerships. Theorized qualities of couple stability and associated subjectivities are broadly discussed in relation to the psychologies of attachment, commitment, trust, intimacy, and monogamy. It is argued that these central facets of coupledom, as a microcosm of the sociopolitical realm, work to stabilize and regulate relationships according to static versions of wholeness and certainty. Promissory of an illusionary order that is devoid of perceived chaos, the stabilizations of couple relationships are critiqued as limiting transformative possibility. Aspects common to process philosophy and chaos theory are discussed as laying ontological ground for a relational system that is not structured by way of a misplaced foundational stability. Current research and theory around practices of open non-monogamy are addressed in regard to this.
AdamsJ.JonesW. H. (1997). The conceptualization of marital commitment: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1177–1196.
2.
AinsworthM. D. S.BleharM. C.WatersE.WallS. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
AyersS. (1997). The application of chaos theory to psychology. Theory & Psychology, 7, 373–398.
4.
BarkerM. (2005). This is my partner and this is my… partner’s partner: Constructing a polyamorous identity in a monogamous world. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18, 75–88.
5.
BarkerM.LangdridgeD. (Eds.). (2010a). Understanding non-monogamies. New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
BarkerM.LangdridgeD. (2010b). Whatever happened to non-monogamies? Critical reflections on recent research and theory. Sexualities, 13, 748–772.
7.
BarryA.OsborneT.RoseN. (Eds.). (1996). Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government. London, UK: UCL Press.
8.
BaxterL. A.MontgomeryB. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York, NY: Guilford.
9.
BeckU.Beck-GernsheimE. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
10.
BerneE. (1964). Games people play. New York, NY: Grove Press.
11.
BlockJ. D. (2000). Broken promises, mended hearts: Maintaining trust in love relationships. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
12.
BlumsteinP.SchwartzP. (1983). American couples. New York, NY: Morrow.
13.
BoonS. D. (1994). Dispelling doubt and uncertainty: Trust in romantic relationships. In DuckS. (Ed.), Dynamics of relationships: Understanding relationship processes (Vol. 4, pp. 86–111). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
BowlbyJ. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London, UK: Routledge.
17.
BrandenN. (1981). The psychology of romantic love. New York, NY: Bantam.
18.
BrennanK. A.ClarkC. L.ShaverP. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: Guilford.
19.
BrownS. D.StennerP. (2009). Psychology without foundations: History, philosophy and psychosocial theory. London, UK: Sage.
20.
BuunkB. P.DijkstraP. (2000). Extradyadic relationships and jealousy. In HendrickC.HendrickS. S. (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 317–330). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
CancianF. M. (1987). Love in America: Gender and self-development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
CramerD. (1998). Close relationships: The study of love and friendship. London, UK: Arnold.
23.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (2004). Anti-Oedipus (HurleyR.SeemM.LaneH.R., Trans.). London, UK: Continuum. (Original work published 1972)
24.
DerridaJ. (2001). Writing and difference (BassA., Trans.). London, UK: Routledge. (Original work published 1967)
25.
De SwannA. (1990). The management of normality: Critical essays in health and welfare. London, UK: Routledge.
26.
DonnellanM. BCongerR. D.BryantC. M. (2004). The big five in enduring marriages. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 481–504.
27.
DuckS. W. (1994). Meaningful relationships: Talking, sense, and relating. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
FeeneyJ. A. (1999). Adult romantic attachment and couple relationships. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 355–377). New York, NY: Guilford.
29.
FergusonH. (1990). The science of pleasure: Cosmos and psyche in the bourgeois world view. London, UK: Routledge.
30.
FinkB. (2002). Knowledge and science: Fantasies of the whole. In GlynosJ.StavrakakisY. (Eds.), Lacan and science (pp. 167–178). London, UK: Karnac.
31.
FinnM. (2010). Conditions of freedom in practices of non-monogamous commitment. In BarkerM.LangdridgeD. (Eds.), Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 225–236). New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
FinnM. (2011). Monogamous order and the avoidance of chaotic excess. Psychology and Sexuality, 3, 123–136. doi: 10.1080/19419899.2011.551834
33.
FinnM.MalsonH. (2008). Speaking of home truth: (Re)productions of dyadic commitment in non-monogamous relationships. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 519–533.
34.
FletcherG. (2002). The new science of intimate relationships. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
35.
FoucaultM. (1983). Preface. In DeleuzeG.GuattariF., Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (HurleyR.SeemM.LaneH.R., Trans.) (pp. xi–xiv). London, UK: Athlone.
36.
FoucaultM. (1998). The history of sexuality: 1. The will to knowledge (HurleyR., Trans.). London, UK: Penguin. (Original work published 1976)
37.
GiddensA. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
38.
GillR.HerdieckerhoffE. (2006). Rewriting the romance: New femininities in chick lit?Feminist Media Studies, 6, 487–504.
39.
GottmanJ. (with SilverN.). (2007). Why marriages succeed or fail: And how you can make yours last. London, UK: Bloomsbury. (Original work published 1994)
40.
GottmanJ.SilverN. (2000). The seven principles for making marriage work. London, UK: Orion.
41.
GottmanJ.SwansonC.MurrayJ. (1999). The mathematics of marital conflict: Dynamic mathematical nonlinear modelling of newlywed marital interaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 13–19.
42.
GottmanJ.SwansonC.SwansonK. (1993). A general systems theory of marriage: Non-linear difference modelling of marital interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 326–340.
43.
GrayJ. (1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
44.
HarveyJ.WenzelA. (Eds.). (2001). Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45.
HassebrauckM.FehrB. (2002). Dimensions of relationship quality. Personal Relationships, 9, 243–270.
46.
HatfieldE.WalsterG. (1978). A new look at love. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
47.
HaylesN. K. (1990). Chaos bound: Orderly disorder in contemporary literature and science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
48.
HazanC.ShaverP. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.
49.
HeaphyB. (2009). Choice and its limits in older lesbian and gay narratives of relational life. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 5(1–2), 119–138.
50.
HeckertJ. (2010). Love without borders? Intimacy, identity and the state of compulsory monogamy. In BarkerM.LangdridgeD. (Eds.), Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 255–266). New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
HeideggerM. (1962). Being and time (MaquarrieJ.RobinsonE., Trans.). Malden, MA: Blackwell. (Original work published 1927)
52.
HendrickS. S. (2004). Understanding close relationships. Boston, MA: Pearson.
53.
HindeR. A. (1978). Interpersonal relationships: In quest of a science. Psychological Medicine, 8, 373–386.
54.
HobbesT. (2008). Leviathan (GaskinJ. C. A., Ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1651)
55.
HolmesJ. G.RempelJ. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In HendrickC. (Ed.), Close relationships (pp. 187–220). London, UK: Sage.
56.
ImmermanR. S.MackeyW. C. (1999). The societal dilemma of multiple sexual partners: The costs of the loss of pair-bonding. Marriage and Family Review, 29, 3–19.
57.
JacksonS.ScottS. (2004). The personal is still political: Heterosexuality, feminism, and monogamy. Feminism and Psychology, 14, 151–157.
58.
JamiesonL. (2004). Intimacy, negotiated non-monogamy and the limits of the couple. In DuncombeJ.HarrisonK.AllanG.MarsdenD. (Eds.), The state of affairs: Explorations in infidelity and commitment (pp. 31–52). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
59.
JohnsonS.LebowJ. (2000). The “coming of age” of couple therapy: A decade review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26, 23–38.
60.
JourardS. M. (1964). The transparent self. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
61.
KelleyH. H.ThibautJ. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
62.
KlesseC. (2007). The spectre of promiscuity: Gay male and bisexual non-monogamies and polyamories. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
63.
KnoblochL. K. (2008). The content of relational uncertainty within marriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 467–495.
64.
KurdekL. A (2004). Are gay and lesbian cohabiting couples really different from heterosexual married couples?Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 880–900.
65.
LacanJ. (1998). The seminar of Jacques Lacan – Book XX: Encore, on feminine sexuality, 1972–1973 (MillerJ. A., Ed.; FinkB., Trans.). New York, NY: Norton. (Original work published 1975)
66.
LaqueurT. (1992). Making sex: Body and gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
LawesR. (1999). Marriage: An analysis of discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1–20.
68.
LevingerG. (1965). Marital cohesiveness and dissolution: An integrative review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 27, 19–28.
69.
LockeH. J.WallaceK. M. (1959). Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21, 251–255.
70.
MackeyR. A.DiemerM. A.O’BrienB. A. (2000, August). Psychological intimacy in the lasting relationships of heterosexual and same-gender couples. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 201–227.
71.
MastersW. H.JohnsonV. E.KolodnyR. C. (1988). Sex and human loving. Toronto, Canada: Little, Brown.
72.
MillerL. C.BergJ. H.ArcherR. L. (1983). Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1234–1244.
73.
MoustakasC. E. (1972). Loneliness and love. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
74.
PatemanC. (1988). The sexual contract. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
75.
PetersB. R. (2004). Marriage in 17th-century English political thought. Basingsgtoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
76.
PlummerK. (1995). Telling sexual stories: Power, change, and social worlds. London, UK: Routledge.
77.
PragerK. J. (1995). The psychology of intimacy. New York, NY: Guilford.
78.
PrigogineI. (1997). The end of certainty: Time, chaos and the new laws of nature. New York, NY: Free Press.
79.
RempelJ. K.HolmesJ. G.ZannaM. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 95–112.
80.
RichardsG. (1996). Putting psychology in its place: An introduction from a critical historical perspective. London, UK: Routledge.
81.
RobinsonV. (1997). My baby just cares for me: Feminism, heterosexuality and non-monogamy. Journal of Gender Studies, 6, 143–157.
82.
RoseN. (1989). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London, UK: Free Association Press.
83.
RotterJ. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35, 1–7.
84.
RusbultC. E.OlsonN.DavisJ. L.HannonP. A. (2001). Commitment and relationship maintenance mechanisms. In HarveyJ.WenzelA. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
85.
SchaeferM. T.OlsonD. H. (1981). Assessing intimacy: The pair inventory. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 7, 47–60.
86.
SerresM. (1995). Genesis (JamesG.NielsonJ., Trans.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. (Original work published 1982)
87.
ShotterJ. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. London, UK: Sage.
88.
ShotterJ.GergenK. J. (Eds.). (1994). Texts of identity. London, UK: Sage.
89.
SpanierG. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.
90.
StennerP. H. D. (2007). Non-foundational criticality? On the need for a process ontology of the psychosocial. Outlines: Critical Practice Studies, 2, 44–55.
91.
StoneL. (1992). Uncertain unions: Marriage in England, 1660–1753. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
92.
TermanL. M.ButtenweiserP.FergusonL.W.JohnsonW. B.WilsonD. P. (1938). Psychological factors in marital happiness. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
93.
ThibautJ. W.KelleyH. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley.
94.
WalsterE.BerscheidE.WalsterG. W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151–176.
95.
WeeksJ.HeaphyB.DonovanC. (2001). Same sex intimacies: Families of choice and other life experiments. London, UK: Routledge.
96.
WeigelD.MurrayC. (2000). The paradox of stability and change in relationships: What does chaos theory offer for the study of romantic relationships?Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 425–449.
97.
WetherellM. (1995). Romantic discourse and feminist analysis: Interrogating investment, power and desire. In WilkinsonS.KitzingerC. (Eds.), Feminism and discourse: Psychological perspectives (pp. 128–144). London, UK: Sage.
98.
WilkinsonE. (2010). What’s queer about non-monogamy now? In BarkerM.LangdridgeD. (Eds.), Understanding non-monogamies (pp. 243–254). New York, NY: Routledge.
99.
WilligC. (1997). The limitations of trust in intimate relationships: Constructions of trust and sexual risk taking. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 211–221.
100.
WorthH.ReidA.MacMillanK. (2002). Somewhere over the rainbow: Love trust and monogamy in gay relationships. Journal of Sociology, 38, 237–253.
