Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Psychological research and practice both start from what we all know about being human because we are human, what we know about each other because we participate in shared meaning systems (language and culture), and what we know about unique individuals. Practitioners rely on these three sources of knowledge, but researchers try to establish a fourth kind by looking for a limited number of general and empirically based regularities. However, this project runs aground because of four characteristics of personal processes: they are influenced by an indefinitely high number of factors; they are sensitive to outcomes and, hence, always changeable; the regularities that can be found stem from participation in shared meaning systems already implicitly familiar; and they are unique. These characteristics are circumvented in the popular randomized controlled trial research design, but at the expense of practical relevance of the findings.

Keywords

a priori psychology common sense intentionality irreversibility randomized controlled trials design shared meaning uniqueness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bandura, A. ( 1982). The psychology of chance encounters and life paths. American Psychologist, 37, 747-755.

Bergner, R. ( 2006). The many secure knowledge bases of psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 60, 215-231.

Bruner, J.S. ( 1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Danziger, K. ( 1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Dilthey, W. ( 1977). Descriptive psychology and historical understanding (R.M. Zaner & K.L. Heiges, Trans.). The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. (Original works published 1894 and 1927)

Ebbinghaus, H. ( 1983). Urmanuskript "Ueber das Gedächtniss." Passauer Schriften zur Psychologiegeschichte, 1. Passau, Germany: Passavia Universitätsverlag.

Gadamer, H.G. ( 1989). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.; J. Weinsheimer & D.G. Marshall, Trans.). New York: Continuum. (Original work published 1960)

Gergen, K.J. ( 1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology . American Psychologist, 40, 266-275.

Gergen, K.J. , & Davis, K.E. (Eds.). (1985). The social construction of the person. New York: Springer-Verlag .

10.

Goddard, C. , & Wierzbicka, A. (Eds.). (1994). Semantics and lexical universals . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

11.

Heidegger, M. ( 1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.) . New York: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1927)

12.

Heider, F. ( 1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

13.

Ossorio, P.G. ( 2006). The behavior of persons: The collected works of Peter G. Ossorio (Vol. 5). Ann Arbor, MI: Descriptive Psychology Press.

14.

Paul, G.L. ( 2007). Psychotherapy outcome can be studied scientifically. In S.O. Lilienfeld & E.T. O’Donahue (Eds.), The great ideas of clinical science (pp. 119-147). New York: Routledge .

15.

Roediger, H.L. ( 2008). Relativity of remembering: Why the laws of memory vanished . Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 225-254.

16.

Semin, G.R. , & Gergen, K.J. (Eds.). (1990). Everyday understanding: Social and scientific implications. London: Sage.

17.

Siegfried, J. (Ed.). (1994). The status of common sense in psychology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

18.

Smedslund, J. ( 1987). Ebbinghaus, the illusionist: How psychology came to look like an experimental science. Passauer Schriften zur Psychologiegeschichte , 5, 225-239. Passau, Germany: Passavia Universitätsverlag.

19.

Smedslund, J. ( 1988). Psycho-logic. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.

20.

Smedslund, J. ( 1991). The pseudo-empirical in psychology and the case for psycho-logic . Psychological Inquiry, 2, 325-338.

21.

Smedslund, J. ( 1997). The structure of psychological common sense. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

22.

Smedslund, J. ( 2002). From hypothesis-testing psychology to procedure-testing psycho-logic. Review of General Psychology, 6, 51-72.

23.

Smedslund, J. ( 2004). Dialogues about a new psychology. Chagrin Falls, OH: Taos Institute Publications.

24.

Smith, J.A., Harré, R. , & Van Langenhove, L. (Eds.). (1995a). Rethinking psychology. London : Sage.

25.

Smith, J.A. , Harré, R. , & Van Langenhove, L. (Eds.). (1995b). Rethinking methods in psychology. London: Sage.

26.

Teigen, K.H. ( 2002). One hundred years of laws in psychology. American Journal of Psychology, 115, 103-118.

27.

Wallach, M.A. , & Wallach, L. ( 1998). When experiments serve little purpose: Misguided research in mainstream psychology. Theory & Psychology, 8, 183-194.

28.

Wierzbicka, A. ( 1996). Semantics: Primes and universals. New York: Oxford University Press.

The Mismatch between Current Research Methods and the Nature of Psychological Phenomena

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References