Perception of Affordances in Multi-Scale Dynamics as an Alternative Explanation for Equivalence of Analogical and Inferential Reasoning in Animals and Humans
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online February, 2010
Perception of Affordances in Multi-Scale Dynamics as an Alternative Explanation for Equivalence of Analogical and Inferential Reasoning in Animals and Humans
Recent claims of equivalence of animal and human reasoning are evaluated and a study of avian cognition serves as an exemplar of weaknesses in these arguments. It is argued that current research into neurobiological cognition lacks theoretical breadth to substantiate comparative analyses of cognitive function. Evaluation of a greater range of theoretical explanations is needed to verify claims of equivalence in animal and human cognition. We conclude by exemplifying how the notion of affordances in multi-scale dynamics can capture behavior attributed to processes of analogical and inferential reasoning in animals and humans.
Beek, P.J., & Meijer, O.G. ( 1988). On the nature of the motor-action controversy. In O.G. Meijer, & K. Roth (Eds.), Complex movement behaviour: The motor-action controversy (pp. 157-185). Amsterdam: North-Holland .
2.
Berridge, K.C. ( 1990). Comparative fine structure of action: Rules of form and sequence in the grooming patterns of six rodent species. Behaviour, 113, 21-56.
3.
Bridgeman, B. ( 2002). Attention and visually guided behavior in distinct systems . In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (pp. 120-135). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4.
Chappell, J. ( 2006). Avian cognition: Understanding tool use. Current Biology, 16, R244-R245.
5.
Davids, K., Button, C., Araújo, D., Renshaw, I., & Hristovski, R. (2006). Movement models from sports provide representative task constraints for studying adaptive behavior in human movement systems. Adaptive Behavior, 14, 73-94.
6.
Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. , & Kokinov, B. (Eds.). (2001). The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
7.
Gibson, J. ( 1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
8.
Gibson, J.J. ( 1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
Goodale, M.A., & Milner, A.D. ( 1992). Separate pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20-25.
10.
Goodale, M.A., & Milner, A.D. ( 2004). Sight unseen. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
Gopnik, A., & Schultz, L. ( 2004). Mechanisms of theory formation in young children. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 371-377.
12.
Inoue, S., & Matsuzawa, T. ( 2007). Working memory of numerals in chimpanzees. Current Biology, 17, R1004-R1005.
Keijzer, F. ( 2001). Representation and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Milner, A.D., & Goodale, M.A. ( 1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
Oden, D., Thompson, R., & Premack, D. ( 2001). Can an ape reason analogically? Comprehension and production of analogical problems by Sarah, a chimpanzee. In D. Gentner, K. Holyoak, & B. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 472-497). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
Premack, D. ( 2007). Human and animal cognition: Continuity and discontinuity . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 13861-13867.
18.
Reed, E.S., Montgomery, M., Schwartz, M., Palmer, C., & Pittenger, J. ( 1992). Visually based descriptions of an everyday action. Ecological Psychology, 4, 129-152.
19.
Rossetti, Y., & Pisella, L. ( 2002). Several "vision for action" systems: A guide to dissociating and integrating dorsal and ventral functions. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (pp. 62-119). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20.
Scarantino, A. ( 2003). Affordances explained. Philosophy of Science, 70, 949-961.
Taylor, A.H., Hunt, G.R., Holzhaider, J.C., & Gray, R.D. ( 2007). Spontaneous meta-tool use by New Caledonian crows. Current Biology, 17, 1504-1507.
23.
Turvey, M.T., & Shaw, R.E. ( 1995). Toward an ecological physics and a physical psychology . In R.L. Solso & D.W. Massaro (Eds.), The science of the mind: 2001 and beyond (pp. 144-169). New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
Turvey, M.T., & Shaw, R.E. ( 1999). Ecological foundations of cognition I: Symmetry and specificity of animal-environment systems. Journal of Consciousness Studies , 6(11-12), 95-110.
25.
Warren, W.H. ( 2006). The dynamics of perception and action. Psychological Review, 113, 358-389.
26.
Wood, J.N., Glynn, D.D., Phillips, B.C., & Hauser, M.D. ( 2007). The perception of rational, goal-directed action in nonhuman primates. Science, 317, 1402-1405.
