In his Critique of Pure Reason, Kant (1787/1998) suggested that scientific and humanistic interpretations of human existence can and should be woven into `a single philosophical system' (p. 695). Yet, Kant was well aware of the profound tension between theoretical analyses of the natural order and practical accounts of our experience as moral agents. In this essay, I argue that the Tree of Knowledge System proposed by Henriques (2003, 2004, 2008) has the scope and conceptual power necessary to account for the emergence of the Kantian tension between theoretical and practical reason. Following Kant, however, I maintain that this tension cannot be adequately resolved on a theoretical plane. Rather, a holistic account of the cultural-person-as-a-whole requires the subordination of theoretical to practical reason. Concretely, this implies that the quest for theoretical unification cannot proceed without concomitant evaluations of the various justification systems that guide the work of scholars in the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities.
Henriques, G.R. (2008). The problem of psychology and the integration of human knowledge: Contrasting Wilson's consilience with the Tree of Knowledge System. Theory & Psychology, 18, 731-755.
11.
James, W. (1990). Pragmatism. In M.J. Adler (Ed.), Great books of the Western world (Vol. 55, pp. 1-64). Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. (Original work published 1907)
12.
Kant, I. (1996a). An answer to the question: What is enlightenment? In M.J. Gregor (Ed. and Trans.), The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant: Practical philosophy (pp. 17-22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1784)
13.
Kant, I. (1996b). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. In M.J. Gregor (Ed. and Trans.), The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant: Practical philosophy (pp. 39-108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1785)
14.
Kant, I. (1996c). Critique of practical reason. In M.J. Gregor (Ed. and Trans.), The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant: Practical philosophy (pp. 137-271). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1788)
15.
Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A.W. Wood, Eds. and Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1781, 1st ed.; 1787, 2nd ed.)
16.
Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the power of judgment (P. Guyer, Ed.; P. Guyer & E. Matthews, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1790)
17.
Kihlstrom, J.F. (2004). Unity within psychology, and unity between science and practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 1243-1247.
18.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice: Vol. 1. Essays on moral development. New York: Harper & Row.
19.
Kohlberg, L. (1994). Moral development: A compendium: Vol. 3. Kohlberg's original study of moral development (B. Puka, Ed.). New York: Garland . (Original work published 1958)
20.
Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., & Hewer, A. (1983). Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to the critics. New York: Karger .
21.
Krebs, D. (2004). An evolutionary reconceptualization of Kohlberg's model of moral development. In R.L. Burgess & K. MacDonald (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human development (2nd ed., pp. 243-275). London: SAGE.
22.
Kuehn, M. (2001). Kant: A biography. New York : Cambridge University Press.
23.
Matthews, W.J. (1998). Let's get real: The fallacy of post-modernism . Journal of Theroetical and Philosophical Psychology, 18, 16-32.
24.
McAdams, D.P. (1992). Unity and purpose in human lives: The emergence of identity as a life story. In R.A. Zucker , A.I. Rabin, J. Aronoff, & S.J. Frank (Eds.), Personality structure in the life course: Essays on personology in the Murray tradition (pp. 323-375). New York: Springer.
25.
Menand, L. (2001). The metaphysical club: A story of ideas in America . New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
26.
Myers, D.G. (2000). The funds, friends, and faith of happy people . American Psychologist, 55, 56-67.
27.
Quackenbush, S.W. (2005). Remythologizing culture: Narrativity, justification, and the politics of personalization. Journal of Clinical Psychology , 61, 67-80.
28.
Shaffer, L.S. (2005). From mirror self-recognition to the looking-glass self: Exploring the Justification Hypothesis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 47-65.
29.
Sokal, A.D. (1996a). Transgressing the boundaries: Towards a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity. Social Text, 46/47, 217-252.
30.
Sokal, A.D. (1996b). Transgressing the boundaries: An afterword. Dissent, 43, 93-99.
31.
Staats, A.W. (1991). Unified positivism and unification psychology: Fad or new field? American Psychologist, 46, 899-912.
32.
Stam, H.J. (2004). Unifying psychology: Epistemological act or disciplinary maneuver? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 1259-1262.
33.
Sternberg, R.J., Grigorenko, E.L., & Kalmar, D.A. (2001). The role of theory in unified psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 21, 99-117.
34.
Taylor, S.E., & Brown, J.D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
35.
Teehan, J. (2003). Kantian ethics: After Darwin. Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 38, 49-60.
36.
Viney, W. (2004). Pluralism in the sciences is not easily dismissed . Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 1275-1278.
37.
Wilson, E.O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage.
