Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper explores a tension in qualitative psychology between, on the one hand, a deconstructionist framework in which the human subject is understood as positioned in and through competing discourses and, on the other, a humanistic framework in which the integrity of the subject is taken to be both a starting- and end-point of analysis. This paper offers a critique of the tendency for qualitative research to seek to produce integrated `narratives' of experience and argues for the importance of maintaining the vision of a subject in fragments. It does so by taking up the notion of there being `things that can't be said' and suggesting that this refers to two distinct issues: the multiplicity of possible accounts of experience and the way language systematically excludes some `abjected' material. It finishes with an illustrative analysis of an interview text.

Keywords

language narrative analysis psychoanalysis qualitative research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barrie, J.M. (1993). Peter Pan. Ware: Wordsworth Editions. (Original work published 1911)

Benjamin, J. (1998). Shadow of the other: Intersubjectivity and gender in psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge .

Billig, M. (1999). Freudian repression: Conversation creating the unconscious. London: SAGE.

Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life. London: Verso.

Byatt, A. (1987). Sugar and other stories. London : Vintage.

Emerson, P. , & Frosh, S. (2004). Critical narrative analysis in psychology. London: Palgrave.

Frosh, S. (1991). Identity crisis. London: Macmillan.

Frosh, S. (2002). Things that can't be said: Psychoanalysis and the limits of language. In After words: The personal in gender, culture and psychotherapy (pp. 134—149). London: Palgrave.

Frosh, S. (2004). A.S. Byatt in conversation with Stephen Frosh . Psychology and Psychotherapy, 77, 145—159.

10.

Frosh, S. (2006). For and against psychoanalysis (2nd ed.). London: Routledge .

11.

Frosh, S. , Phoenix, A. , & Pattman, R. (2003). Taking a stand: Using psychoanalysis to explore the positioning of subjects in discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 39—53.

12.

Habermas, J. (1987). Knowledge and human interests. Cambridge: Polity. (Original work published 1968)

13.

Hollway, W. , & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently. London: SAGE.

14.

Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.

15.

Labov, W. , & Fanshell, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation . New York/San Francisco/ London: Academic Press.

16.

Lacan, J. (1954—1955). The seminars of Jacques Lacan, Book II: The ego in Freud's theory and in the technique of psychoanalysis . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Lacan, J. (1982). God and the jouissance of the woman. In J. Mitchell & J. Rose (Eds.), Feminine sexuality (pp. 137—148). London: Macmillan. (Original work published 1972—1973)

18.

Laplanche, J. (1997). The theory of seduction and the problem of the other. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 78, 653—666.

19.

Laplanche, J. (2003). Narrativity and hermeneutics: Some propositions . New Formations, 48, 26—29.

20.

Mana, A. (1995). Beyond the masks: Race, gender and subjectivity . London: Routledge.

21.

Nesbit, E. (1993). The railway children. Ware: Wordsworth Editions . (Original work published 1906)

22.

Parker, I. (2005a). Lacanian discourse analysis in psychology: Seven theoretical elements. Theory & Psychology, 15, 163—182.

23.

Parker, I. (2005b). Qualitative psychology: Introducing radical research Maidenhead: Open University Press .

24.

Rushdie, S. (1990). Haroun and the sea of stories. London: Granta.

Disintegrating Qualitative Research

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References