This essay applies philosophical principles and method to compare `imitation' as it is used in everyday contexts with its use in laboratory research and theorizing on human neonates. Its primary goal is to demonstrate the practicability and effectiveness of a philosophical method of conceptual analysis and to suggest benefits of the method's use in contexts of empirical research and theorizing in psychology. A selective summary of research and theorizing including and subsequent to Meltzoff and Moore's experiments on neonatal imitation is followed by a discussion of general principles of conceptual analysis in the analytical tradition, including the distinction between `sense' and `nonsense'. The concept of imitation is analyzed toward producing a `conceptual snapshot' for direct comparison between its possibilities of use and meaning outside and in the laboratory. Analysis shows that the concept is virtually devoid of sense in latter contexts. Results of analysis are defended against possible objections and applied to some relevant theorizing.
Abravanel, E., & Sigafoos, A.D. (1984). Exploring the presence of imitation during early infancy. Child Development, 55, 381—392.
2.
Anisfeld, M. (1991). Review: Neonatal imitation. Developmental Review, 11, 60—97.
3.
Anisfeld, M. (1996). Only tongue protrusion modeling is matched by neonates. Developmental Review, 16, 149—161.
4.
Anscombe, G.E.M. (1965). The intentionality of sensation: A grammatical feature. In R.J. Butler (Ed.), Analytical philosophy (pp. 158—180). Oxford: Blackwell.
5.
Baker, G.P., & Hacker, P.M.S. (1982). The grammar of psychology: Wittgenstein's Bermerkungen über die Philosophie der Psychologie. Language & Communication, 2, 227—244.
Coulter, J. (1983). Rethinking cognitive theory. New York: St Martin's Press.
8.
Glock, H.-J. (1996). A Wittgenstein dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell.
9.
Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A.N. (1997). Words, thoughts, and theories . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
Hacker, P.M.S. (1996). Wittgenstein's place in twentieth-century analytic philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
11.
Harré, R., & Tissaw, M.A. (2005). Wittgenstein and psychology: A practical guide . Aldershot: Ashgate.
12.
Heyes, C. (2001). Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 1—12.
13.
James, W. (1983). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1890.)
14.
Jones, S.S. (1996). Imitation or exploration? Young infants' matching of adults' oral gestures. Child Development, 67, 1952—1969.
15.
Kelly, G.A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vol. 1). New York: Norton.
16.
Krechevsky, I. (1932). `Hypotheses' in rats. Psychological Review, 39, 516—532.
17.
Leudar, I., & Costall, A. (Eds.). (2004). Theory of Mind [Special issue]. Theory &Psychology, 14(5).
18.
Machamer, P., & Sytsma, J. (2007). Neuroscience and theoretical psychology: What's to worry about? Theory &Psychology, 17, 199—216.
19.
Maratos, O. (1973). The origin and development of imitation in the first six months of life. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Geneva.
20.
Maurer, D., Stager, D.L., & Mondloch, C.J. (1994). Cross-modal transfer of shape is difficult to demonstrate in one-month-olds. Child Development, 70, 1047—1057.
21.
Meltzoff, A.N. (1988). Infant imitation after a 1-week delay: Long-term memory for novel acts and multiple stimuli. Developmental Psychology, 24, 470—476.
22.
Meltzoff, A.N. (1990). Foundations for developing a concept of self: The role of imitation in relating self to other and the value of social mirroring, social modeling, and self practice in infancy. In D. Cicchetti & M. Beeghly (Eds.), The self in transition: Infancy to childhood (pp. 139—164). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Meltzoff, A.N. (2002). Elements of a developmental theory of imitation . In A.N. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.), The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases (pp. 19—41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Meltzoff, A.N., & Borton, R. (1979). Intermodal matching by human neonates. Nature, 282, 403—404.
25.
Meltzoff, A.N., & Moore, M.K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75—78.
26.
Meltzoff, A.N., & Moore, M.K. (1989). Imitation in newborn infants: Exploring the range of gestures imitated and the underlying mechanisms. Developmental Psychology, 25, 954—962.
27.
Meltzoff, A.N., & Moore, M.K. (1992). Early imitation within a functional framework: The importance of person identity, movement, and development. Infant Behavior and Development, 15, 470—505.
28.
Meltzoff, A.N., & Moore, M.K. (1994). Imitation, memory, and the representation of persons . Infant Behavior and Development, 17, 83—99.
29.
Meltzoff, A.N., & Moore, M.K. (1995). A theory of the role of imitation in the emergence of self. In P. Rochat (Ed.), The self in infancy: Theory and research.advances in psychology (pp. 73—93). Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier Science.
30.
Meltzoff, A.N., & Moore, M.K. (1997). Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model . Early Development and Parenting, 6, 179—192.
31.
Meltzoff, A.N., & Prinz, W. (Eds.). (2002). The imitative mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Myowa-Yamakoshi, M., Tomonaga, M., Tanaka, M., & Matsuzawa, T. (2004). Imitation in neonatal chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) . Developmental Science, 7, 437—442.
33.
Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood (G. Gattegno & F.M. Hodgson, Trans.). New York: Norton.
34.
Provine, R.R. (1989). Contagious yawning and infant imitation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 125—126.
35.
Robinson, D. (2007). Theoretical psychology: What is it and who needs it? Theory &Psychology, 17, 187—198.
36.
Ryle, G. (1951). Thinking and language. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 25(Suppl.), 65—82.
37.
Sharrock, W., & Coulter, J. (2004). ToM: A critical commentary. Theory &Psychology, 14, 579—600.
38.
Stern, D.G. (1995). Wittgenstein on mind and language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
Tissaw, M.A. (1999). `Seeing connexions' in psychology: An explication and application of Wittgenstein's philosophical method. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University.
40.
Tomasello, M., Kruger, A.C., & Ratner, H.H. (1993). Cultural learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 495—552.
41.
Uzgiris, I.C. (1991). The social context of infant imitation. In M. Lewis & S. Feinman (Eds.), Social influences and socialization in infancy (pp. 215—251). New York: Plenum .
42.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (G.E.M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.
43.
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty (D. Paul & G.E.M. Anscombe, Trans.) . Oxford: Blackwell.
44.
Wittgenstein, L. (1993). `Philosophy': Sections 86—93 (pp. 405—435) of the so-called `Big typescript' (H. Nyman, Ed.; C.G. Luckhardt & M.A.E. Aue, Trans.). In LWittgenstein, Philosophical occasions: 1912—1951 (J.C. Klagge & A. Nordmann, Eds.) (pp. 160—199). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
