Paradigm change is a special type of conceptual change, but what makes it special? A useful strategy for analysing conceptual changes is to identify and then contrast the respective sets of judgement criteria in play before and after the change. Several types of conceptual change can thus be structurally distinguished within moral, aesthetic as well as cognitive domains. This strategy also makes it possible to identify the specific structure of what Kuhn called paradigm change, which I suggest can be seen as a form of criterion mutation and concomitant domain transformation. This fits well with the claim made in recent conceptual change literature that there is a structural similarity between various forms of collective and individual conceptual change, particularly in the history of the sciences and corresponding approaches to science education. In both cases, local incommensurability between the stages, as opposed to acommensurability, is the hallmark of paradigm change.
Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
Carey, S. (1991). Knowledge acquisition: Enrichment or conceptual change? In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition (pp. 257—291). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
Carey, S., & Gelman, R. (Eds.). (1991). The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Chi, M.T.H. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glazer (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 161—238). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
Chi, M.T.H., & Roscoe, R. (2002). Processes and challenges of conceptual change . In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 3—27). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
6.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague : Mouton.
7.
Gelman, S.A., & Diesendruck, G. (1999). A reconsideration of concepts: On the compatibility of psychological essentialism and context sensitivity . In E.K. Scholnick, K. Nelson, S.A. Gelman, & P.H. Miller (Eds.), Conceptual development: Piaget's legacy (pp. 79—102). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Keil, F.C. (1979). Semantic and ontological development: An ontological perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development. Vol. I: The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harper & Row.
11.
Kuhn, T.S. (1957). The Copernican revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Kuhn, T.S. (1974). Reflections on my critics. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 231—278). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Kuhn, T.S. (1983). Commensurability, comparability, communicability . In P.D. Asquith & T. Nickles (Eds.), PSA1982 (Vol. 2, pp. 669—688). East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
16.
Kuhn, T.S. (1987). What are scientific revolutions? In L. Krüger, L.J. Daston, & M. Heidelberger (Eds.), The probabilistic revolution. Vol. 1: Ideas in history (pp. 7—22). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
Limón, M., & Mason, L. (Eds.). (2002). Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18.
Mondrian, P.C. (1987). Toward the true vision of reality. In H. Holtzman & M.S. James (Eds. and Trans.), The new art—the new life: The collected writings of Piet Mondrian (pp. 338—341). London : Thames & Hudson. (Original work published 1941.)
19.
Moore, G.E. (1903). Principia ethica. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
20.
Norman, D.A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner & A.L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 7—14). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
Nussbaum, J., & Novak, J.D. (1976). An assessment of children's concepts of the earth utilizing structured interviews. Science Education, 60, 535—550.
22.
Sankey, H. (1997). Rationality, relativism and incommensurability . Aldershot: Ashgate.
23.
Schnotz, W., Vosniadou, S. , & Carretero, M. (Eds.). (1999). New perspectives on conceptual change. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
Van Haaften, W. (1998). Preliminaries to a logic of development. Theory & Psychology, 8, 399—422.
27.
Van Haaften, W. (2001). Ideational movements: Developmental patterns. Developmental Review, 21, 67—92.
28.
Van Haaften, W. (2003/2004). Logic of artistic development: The case of Mondrian. New Ideas in Psychology, 21, 221—246. (Republished with colour reproductions in New Ideas in Psychology, 22, 71—96.)
29.
Verschaffel, L., & Vosniadou, S. (Eds.). (2004). The conceptual change approach to mathematics learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction , 14, 445—548.
30.
Vosniadou, S. (1999). Conceptual change research: State of the art and future directions. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 3—13). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
31.
Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W.F. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development . Review of Educational Research, 57, 51—67.
32.
Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W.F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535—585.
