Münsterberg in 1898,Not Allport in 1937,Introduced the Terms ‘Idiographic’ and ‘Nomothetic’ to American Psychology

Abstract

Psychologists use the term ‘idiographic’ to refer to the characteristics of unique individuals and ‘nomothetic’ to refer to universal characteristics. It is widely accepted that Gordon Allport borrowed those terms from the German philosopher Wilhelm Windelband and introduced the idiographic/nomothetic distinction to American psychology. However, in this paper we argue that the terms were made a part of American psychological discourse at least as early as 1898 by Hugo Münsterberg, two generations before Allport, and were incorporated by William Stern, who had a strong influence on Allport. Recognizing Münsterberg's and Stern's contribution assists in a more secure interpretation of Allport's understanding of the importance of a balance between idiographic and nomothetic approaches.

Keywords

Allport idiographic Münsterberg nomothetic Stern Windelband

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allport, G.W. (1923). The Leipzig Congress of Psychology . American Journal of Psychology, 34, 612–615 .

Allport, G.W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt .

Allport, G.W. (1967). Gordon W. Allport. In E.G. Boring & G. Lindzey (Eds.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. V. pp. 3–25). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts .

Ghougassian, J.P. (1972). Gordon W. Allport's ontopsychology of the person. New York: Philosophical Library .

Gould, S.J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .

Hale, M. (1980). Human science and social order: Hugo Münsterberg and the origins of applied psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press .

Kenrick, D.T. , & Dantchik, A. (1983). Interactionism, idiographics, and the social psychological invasion of personality . Journal of Personality, 51, 286–307 .

Lamiell, J.T. (1987). The psychology of personality. New York: Columbia University Press .

Lamiell, J.T. (1997). Individuals and differences. In R. Hogan , J. Johnson , & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 117–141). San Diego: Academic Press .

10.

Lamiell, J.T. (1998). Translator's preface to Windelband's Address of the Rector of the University of Strassburg 1894: History and Natural Science . Theory & Psychology, 8, 5–22 .

11.

Lamiell, J.T. (2003). Beyond individual and group differences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .

12.

MacKinnon, D.W. , & Maslow, A.H. (1951). Personality. In H. Helson (Ed.), Theoretical foundations of psychology (pp. 602–655). New York: Van Nostrand .

13.

Münsterberg, H. (1899). Psychology and history . Psychological Review, 6, 1–31 .

14.

Münsterberg, H. (1903). The position of psychology in the system of knowledge . Psychological Monographs, 4, 641–654 .

15.

Münsterberg, H. (1914). Psychology: General and applied. New York: Appleton .

16.

Münsterberg, M. (1922). Hugo Münsterberg: His life and work. New York: Appleton .

17.

Münsterberg, H. (1994). Psychology and history . Psychological Review, 101, 230–236 . (Original work published 1899.)

18.

Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill .

19.

Runyan, W.M. (1982). Life histories and psychobiography: Explorations in theory and method. New York: Oxford University Press .

20.

Stern, W. (1961). William Stern. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. I, pp. 335–388). New York: Russell & Russell .

21.

Whyte, L.L. (1954). Accent of form: An anticipation of the science of tomorrow. In R.N. Anshen (Ed.), World perspectives (Vol. 2, p. 198-198). New York: Harper .

22.

Windelband, W. (1998). History and natural science . Theory & Psychology, 8, 5–22 . (Original work published 1894.)

23.

Winthrop, H. (1956). Tender-mindedness versus tough-mindedness in psychology: A reexamination . Genetic Psychology Monographs, 54, 167–205 .