In this paper, I want to suggest a framework for the study of action that does notturn ‘culture’ and ‘psychological phenomena’ into two sides ofa dichotomy, but which is sensitive to the context of action. This is called for in view of what seem to be genuinely interesting developments in our thinking about ourselves: for example,theoretical and empirical attempts to re-unite brain, body, words and world in such a way thatit is no longer interesting to speculate merely about what is ‘in’, and opposed towhat is ‘outside’, the individual. Briefly, I propose a definition of culture thatseems to offer productive empirical possibilities. After this I suggest an empirical focus on task, participant(s) and situation, by way of explicating the resources and constraints operating during action-in-context.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Appiah, K.A., & Gutmann, A. (1996). Color conscious: The political morality of race. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
2.
Baerveldt, C., & Voestermans, P. (2000). Het misverstand cultuur: Naar een psychologie van biculturaliteit . Nederlandse Tijdschrift voor Psychologie, 55, 109–120 .
3.
Barkow, J.H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). The adapted mind. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press .
4.
Beer, R.D. (2000). Dynamical approaches to cognitive science . Trends in CognitiveScience, 4(3), 91–99 .
5.
Berlin, I. (1992). The crooked timber of humanity. New York: Vintage .
6.
Bernstein, R.J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism. Oxford: Blackwell .
7.
Bickle, J. (1996). New wave psychophysical reductionism and the methodological caveats . Philosophy and Phenomenology, LVI, 56–76 .
8.
Blackmore, S. (1999). The meme machine. New York: Oxford University Press .
9.
Budoff, M. (1987). Measures for assessing learning potential. In C. Schneider Lidz(Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential(pp. 173–195). New York: Guilford .
10.
Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
11.
Clark, A. (1999). Where brain, body and world collide . Cognitive Systems Research,1(1), 5–17 .
12.
Clark, A. (2001). Reasons, robots and the extended mind . Mind and Language,16(2), 121–145 .
13.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press .
14.
Cole, M., & Scribner, S. (1974). Culture and thought: A psychological introduction. New York: Wiley .
15.
Cole, M., Valsiner, J., Engelstr®om, Y., Branco, A.U., & Vasquez, O. (1998).Mind, culture and activity. Seminal papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
16.
Cooper, C.R., & Denner, J. (1998). Theories linking culture and psychology:Universal and community-specific processes . Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 559–584 .
17.
Craig, A.P. (1997). Postmodern pluralism and our selves . Theory & Psychology,7(4), 505–527 .
18.
Craig, A.P. (1999). What it is that one knows when one knows ‘psychology’? Theory & Psychology, 9(2), 197–227 .
19.
Craig, A.P. (2000). Time and learning . South African Journal of Psychology,30(4), 6–16 .
20.
Craig, A.P. (2001). Culture and knowledge . South African Journal of Philosophy,20(2), 191–214 .
21.
D’Andrade, R.G. (1981). The cultural part of cognition . Cognitive Science, 5, 179–195 .
22.
Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene(new ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press .
23.
Dawkins, R. (1991). The blind watchmaker. London: Penguin .
24.
Durham, W.H. (1990). Advances in evolutionary culture theory . Annual Review ofAnthropology, 19, 187–210 .
25.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books .
26.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity .
27.
Gutmann, A. (Ed.). (1994). Multiculturalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
28.
Haack, S. (1993). Evidence and inquiry. Oxford: Blackwell .
29.
Haack, S. (1998). Manifesto of a passionate moderate. Chicago, IL: University ofChicago Press .
30.
Harr¥e, R., & Secord, P.F. (1972). The explanation of social behaviour. Oxford:Blackwell .
31.
Hofstee, W.K.B., Kiers, A.L., De Raad, B., Godlberg, L.R., & Ostendorf, F. (1997). A comparison of Big-Five structures of personality traits in Dutch, English, and German . European Journal of Personality, 11(1), 15–31 .
32.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
33.
Ingleby, D. (2000). De gevolgen van multiculturaliteit voor de psychologie .Nederlandse Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 55, 96–108 .
34.
Innis, R.E. (1994). Consciousness and the play of signs. Bloomingdale/Indianapolis:Indiana University Press .
35.
Jahoda, G. (1982). Psychology and anthropology: A psychological perspective. London: Academic Press .
36.
Kirsh, D. (1996). Adapting the environment instead of oneself . Adaptive Behavior,4(3/4), 415–452 .
37.
K®ohler, W. (1999). The mentality of apes. London: Routledge . (Original work published 1925)
38.
Lubinski, D. (2000). Scientific and social significance of assessing individual differences: ‘Sinking shafts at a few critical points’ . Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 405–444 .
39.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press .
40.
Miller, R. (1984). Reflections of mind and culture. Inaugural lecture.Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press .
41.
Nagell, K., Olguin, K., & Tomasello, M. (1993). Processes of social learning in the tool use of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and human children (Homo sapiens) . Journal of Comparative Psychology, 107, 174–186 .
42.
Rorty, R. (1998). Truth and progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
43.
Rowlands, M. (1999). The body in mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
44.
Shotter, J. (1993). Cultural politics of everyday life: Social constructionism, rhetoricand knowing of the third kind. Buckingham: Open University Press .
45.
Spelke, E. (1994). Initial knowledge: Six suggestions . Cognition, 50, 431–445 .
46.
Sternberg, R.J. (Ed.). (1982). Handbook of human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
