Boas, M. (1962). The scientific renaissance 1450-1630. New York: Harper Torchbooks .
2.
Jöorgensen, D. (1999). Der Rechenmeister. Berlin: Rüutten & Loening .
3.
Krajewski, W. (1977). Correspondence principle and the growth of knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel .
4.
Kuipers, T.A.F. (Ed.). (1987). What is closer-to-the-truth? A parade of approaches to truthlikeness. Amsterdam: Rodopi .
5.
Lakatos, I. (1978a). Introduction: Science and pseudoscience. In J. Worrall & G. Currie (Eds.), The methodology of scientific research programmes (pp. 1-7). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
6.
Lakatos, I. (1978b). The method of analysis-synthesis. In J. Worrall & G. Currie (Eds.), Mathematics, science and epistemology (pp. 70-103). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
7.
Lakatos, I., Feyerabend, P., & Motterlini, M. (Eds.). (1999). For and against method. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
8.
Popper, K.R. (1945a). The open society and its enemies, Vol. 1: The spell of Plato. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul .
9.
Popper, K.R. (1945b). The open society and its enemies, Vol. 2: The high tide of prophecy: Hegel, Marx, and the aftermath. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul .
10.
Szmatka, J. (1983). Correspondence principle as a tool explaining the growth of social science . Philosophy of Social Sciences, 13, 47-53 .
