Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this article we outline a response to Mackay's (2003) critique of constructivism as anti-realist, anti-determinist and anti-scientific. We argue that Mackay and constructivists operate from very different theoretical premises. Whereas Mackay sees his philosophical bases as foundational absolutes, constructivists see theirs (as well as Mackay's) as postulated premises. Thus, Mackay's theoretical assumptions, in combination with his construction of a `straw figure' version of his opponents, lead him to see constructivism as incoherent. However, this tells us more about Mackay's point of view than it does about constructivism's coherence. In our view, constructivism is not hostile to scientific discourse, and, indeed, converges at important points with Mackay's own treatment of `experiential meaning'. Ultimately, however, constructivists attempt to stretch the boundaries of permissible scholarly discourse beyond the realist bases advocated by Mackay, in order to analyze and critique the social epistemology by which both psychotherapeutic and scientific processes are constructed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .

Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge .

Chiari, G., & Nuzzo, M.L. (1996). Psychological constructivisms: A metatheoretical differentiation . Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 9, 163-184 .

Gergen, K.J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. London: Sage .

Harré, R. (1986). Varieties of realism: A rationale for the natural sciences. Oxford: Blackwell .

Kelly, G.A. (1991a). The psychology of personal constructs: Vol. 1. A theory of personality. London: Routledge . (Original work published 1955.)

Kelly, G.A. (1991b). The psychology of personal constructs: Vol. 2. Clinical diagnosis and psychotherapy. London: Routledge . (Original work published 1955.)

Lakatos, I. (1974). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91-196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

Lyddon, W. (1995). Forms and facets of constructivist psychology. In R.A. Neimeyer and M.J. Mahoney (Eds.), Constructivism in psychotherapy (pp. 69-92). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .

10.

Mackay, N. (2003). Psychotherapy and the idea of meaning . Theory & Psychology, 13, 359-386 .

11.

Mahoney, M.J. (1991). Human change processes. New York: Basic Books .

12.

Martin, J., & Sugarman, J. (2000). Between the modern and the postmodern: The possibility of self and progressive understanding in psychology . American Psychologist, 55, 397-406 .

13.

Maturana, H.R., & Varela, F.J. (1992). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding (R. Paolucci, Trans.; Rev. ed.). Boston, MA: Shambhala .

14.

Neimeyer, R. A. (1998). Social constructionism in the counselling context . Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 11, 135-149 .

15.

Neimeyer, R.A. (2002). How firm a foundation? A constructivist response to Mahrer's archeology of beliefs about psychotherapy. In J.D. Raskin & S.K. Bridges (Eds.), Studies in meaning: Exploring constructivist psychology (pp. 247-264). New York: Pace University Press .

16.

Pepper, S. (1942). World hypotheses. Berkeley: University of California Press .

17.

Petocz, A. (1999, April). Psychology in the 21st century: Closing the gap between science and the symbol. Paper presented at the International Society for Theoretical Psychology, Sydney, Australia.

18.

Piaget, J. (1971). Psychology and epistemology (A. Rosin, Trans.). New York: Viking . (Original work published 1970.)

19.

Polkinghorne, D.E. (1992). Postmodern epistemology of practice. In S. Kvale (Ed.), Psychology and postmodernism (pp. 146-165). Newbury Park, CA: Sage .

20.

Raskin, J.D. (2002). Constructivism in psychology: Personal construct psychology, radical constructivism, and social constructionism. In J.D. Raskin & S.K. Bridges (Eds.), Studies in meaning: Exploring constructivist psychology (pp. 1-25). New York: Pace University Press .

21.

Vaihinger, H. (1924). The philosophy of `as if': A system of the theoretical, practical, and religious fictions of mankind (C.K. Ogden, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul . (Original work published 1911.)

22.

von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism. London: Falmer .

23.

White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York: Norton .

24.

Winslade, J., & Monk, G. (2001). Narrative mediation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass .

Coherent Constructivism

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References