Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to delineate the role that American philosophy has played in opening the door for social constructionist thought. I assert that James' pragmatism is the main, American, theoretical precursor of the present-day social constructionist movement. More specifically, I compare and contrast William James' work on pragmatism with Kenneth Gergen's approach to social constructionism. There are four main parallels between Gergen's social constructionism and James' pragmatism. The first concerns the importance of `utility' as a method for evaluating truth. Second, James and Gergen both embrace philosophical pluralism. Third, each theorist examines the social construction of knowledge within his respective era. Finally, I examine the parallels of how `progress and knowledge' are viewed within social constructionism and pragmatism. A fuller appreciation of the parallels between pragmatism and social constructionism may lead social constructionists to re-examine the value of James' pragmatism.

Keywords

Kenneth Gergen William James pragmatism social constructionism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berger, P.L. , & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.

Gergen, K.J. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. Basic Books.

Gergen, K.J. (1994). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Gergen, K.J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. London: SAGE Publications.

Gergen, K.J. (2001a). Construction in contention: Toward consequential resolutions. Theory & Psychology, 11, 419-432.

Gergen, K.J. (2001b). Psychological science in a postModern context. American Psychologist, 56, 803-813.

Halling, S. , & Lawrence, C. (1999). Social constructionism: Homogenizing the world, negating embodied experience. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 19, 78-89.

Hergenhahn, B.R. (1997). An introduction to the history of psychology (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A new way for some old ways of thinking. New York: Longmans, Green.

10.

James, W. (1978). The meaning of truth: A sequel to Pragmatism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1909.)

11.

James, W. (1981). The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1890.)

12.

James, W. (1987a). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. In Writings 1902-1910. New York: Library of America. (Original work published 1907.)

13.

James, W. (1987b). The meaning of truth: A sequel to Pragmatism. In Writings 1902-1910. New York: Library of America. (Original work published 1909.)

14.

James, W. (1987c). A pluralistic universe. In Writings 1902-1910. New York: Library of America. (Original work published 1909.)

15.

Maze, J.R. (2001). Social constructionism, deconstructionism and some requirements of discourse. Theory & Psychology, 11, 393-417.

16.

Menand, L.M. (2001). The metaphysical club: A story of ideas in America. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.

17.

Robinson, D.N. (1993). Is there a Jamesian tradition in psychology? American Psychologist, 48, 638-643.

18.

Strube, M.J. , Yost, J.H. , & Bailey, J.R. (1993). William James and contemporary research on the self: The influence of pragmatism, reality, and truth. In M.E. Donnelly (Ed.), Reinterpreting the legacy of William James (pp. 189-207). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

19.

Viney, W. (1989). The cyclops and the twelve-eyed toad: William James and the unity-disunity problem in psychology. American Psychologist, 44, 1261-1265.

Social Constructionism and the Legacy of James' Pragmatism

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References