Dryzek, J.S.
and Berejikian, J. (1993) ‘Reconstructive Democratic Theory’, American Political Science Review87(1): 48-60.
2.
Elden, M.
(1981) ‘Sharing the Research Work: Participative Research and its Role Demands’, pp. 253-266 in P. Reason and J. Rowan (eds) Human Inquiry: A Sourcebook of New Paradigm Research. Chichester: John Wiley.
3.
Harker, M.
(1991) ‘The Legitimisation of Action Research and Action Learning for Management: When Will it Happen?’, pp. 109-117 in C.J. Colins and P.J. Chippendale (eds) Proceedings of the First World Congress on Action Research and Process Management. Vol. 1: Theory and Praxis Frameworks. Brisbane: Acorn Publications.
4.
Henwood, K.
and Pidgeon, N. (1995) ‘Remaking the Link: Qualitative Research and Feminist Standpoint Theory’, Feminism & Psychology5(1): 7-30.
5.
John, I.
(1997) ‘Discursive Construction of the Relationship Between Theory and Practice in Psychology’, Australian Psychologist32(2): 86-92.
6.
Kitzinger, C.
(1986) ‘Introducing and Developing Q as a Feminist Methodology: A Study of Accounts of Lesbianism’, pp. 151-172 in S. Wilkinson (ed.) Feminist Social Psychology: Developing Theory and Practice. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
7.
Kitzinger, C.
and Stainton Rogers, R. (1985) ‘A Q-methodological Study of Lesbian Identities’, European Journal of Social Psychology15: 167-187.
8.
McKeown, B.
and Thomas, D. (1988) Q Methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
Senn, C.Y.
(1996) ‘Q-methodology as Feminist Methodology’, pp. 201-217 in S. Wilkinson (ed.) Feminist Social Psychologies: International Perspectives. Buckingham: Open University Press.
10.
Stainton Rogers, R.
(1995) ‘Q Methodology’, pp. 178-192 in J.A. Smith, R. Harré and L. Van Langenhove (eds) Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London: Sage.
11.
Stainton Rogers, W.
(1991) Explaining Health and Illness: An Exploration of Diversity. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
