Feminist research is explicitly committed to validating (women) informants' experiences, situating them in a context of gender and power relations, and explicating the researcher's own social and cultural position. Such commitments may not be enough, however, when our negative and positive feelings about our informants get in the way of doing our research. In this article, we draw upon our research on women in care professions and our own desire to find feminist heroines within their ranks. After describing our respective experiences of glorifying or dismissing our informants, we explore three strategies for coming to terms with implicit or ‘gut-level’ normativity in feminist research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbelE.K.NelsonM.K. eds (1990) Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women's Lives.Albany: State University of New York Press
BennerP.WrubelJ. (1989) The Primacy of Caring.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
4.
BowlesG.KleinR.D. (1983) Theories of Women's Studies.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
5.
BrownL.M.GilliganC. (1992) Meeting at the Crossroads: Women's Psychology and Girls' Development.Cambridge. MA and London: Harvard University Press
6.
BurmanE. (1992) 'Identification and Power in Feminist Therapy’. Women's Studies International Forum15 (4): 487–98
7.
ChodorowN.J. (1989) Feminism and Psychoanalytic Theory.New Haven and London: Yale University Press
8.
CodeL. (1991) What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge.Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press
9.
CollinsP.H. (1990) Black Feminist Thought.New York: Routledge
10.
DavisK. (1986) ‘The Process of Problem (Re)Formulation in Psychotherapy’, Sociology of Health & Illness8 (1), 44–74
11.
DavisK. (1988) Power Under the Microscope.Dordrecht: Foris
12.
DavisK. (1994) ‘What's in a Voice? Methods and Metaphors’, Feminism & Psychology4 (3), 353–61
13.
DavisK.LeijenaarM.OldersmaJ. eds, (1991) The Gender of Power.London: Sage
14.
FisherB.TrontoJ. (1990) ‘Toward a Feminist Theory of Caring’, in AbelE.K.NelsonM.K. (eds) Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women's Lives.Albany: State University of New York Press
15.
GiddensA. (1984) The Constitution of Society.Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press
16.
GremmenI. (1994) 'Struggling at the Crossroads’, Feminism & Psychology4 (3): 362–6
17.
GremmenI. (1995) Ethiek in de gezinsverzorging; gender en de macht van zorg.Utrecht: Jan van Arkel
18.
HarawayD.J. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women.London: Free Association Books
19.
HardingS. (1986) The Science Question in Feminism.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
20.
HardingS. (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Hare-MustinR.T.MarecekJ. eds (1994) Making a Difference: Psychology and the Construction of Gender.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
23.
HirschM.KellerE.F. eds (1990) Conflicts in Feminism.New York and London: Routledge
24.
KitzingerC. (1996) ‘Theorizing Women's “Experience”’, paper presented at the 6th International Interdisciplinary Congress on Women. Adelaide, Australia, April
LermanH.PorterN. eds (1990) Feminist Ethics in Psychotherapy.New York: Springer Publishing Company
27.
LugonesM.SpelmanE. (1983) ‘Have We Got a Theory for You! Feminist Theory, Cultural Imperialism, and the Demand for the Woman's Voice’, Women's Studies International Forum6: 578–81
28.
MarecekJ.KravetzD. (1996) ‘A Room of One's Own: Power and Agency in Feminist Therapy’, paper presented at the APA Annual Meeting, Toronto, August
29.
MiesM. (1983) ‘Towards a Methodology for Feminist Research’, in BowlesG.KleinR.D. (eds) Theories of Women's Studies.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
30.
MohantyC.T.RussoA.TorresL. eds (1991) Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism.Bloomington: Indiana University Press
31.
MoreE.S.MilliganM.A. eds (1994) The Empathetic Practitioner: Empathy, Gender, and Medicine.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press
32.
NicolaiN. (1992) Vrouwenhulpverlening en psychiatrie.Amsterdam: Sua
33.
PhilipsonI.J. (1993) On the Shoulders of Women: The Feminization of Psychotherapy.New York: Guilford Press
34.
ReinharzS. (1992) Feminist Methods in Social Research.New York: Oxford University Press
35.
RelkeD.M.A. (1993) ‘Foremothers Who Cared: Paula Heimann, Margaret Little and the Female Tradition in Psychoanalysis’, Feminism & Psychology3 (1): 89–109
36.
RobertsH. ed (1981) Doing Feminist Research.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
37.
RoseH. (1994) Love, Power and Knowledge.Cambridge: Polity Press
38.
SchwartzH. (1979) ‘On Recognizing Mistakes: A Case of Practical Reasoning in Psychotherapy’, in SchwartzH.JacobsJ. (eds) Qualitative Sociology.New York: The Free Press
39.
SchwartzH.JacobsJ. (1979) Qualitative Sociology.New York: The Free Press
40.
ShrageL. (1994) Moral Dilemmas of Feminism.New York: Routledge
41.
SpelmanE.V. (1988) Inessential Woman.London: The Women's Press
42.
StanleyL. ed. (1990) Feminist Praxis: Research, Theory and Epistemology in Feminist Sociology.London: Routledge
43.
StanleyL. (1992) The Auto/biographical I. The Theory and Practice of Feminist Auto/biography.Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press
44.
StanleyL.WiseS. (1993) Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology.London and New York: Routledge
45.
TurnerR. (1972) 'Some Formal Properties of Therapy Talk’, in SudnowD. (ed.) Studies in Interaction.New York: Free Press
46.
Van Mens-VerhulstJ.SchilderL. eds (1994) Debatten in de Vrouwenhulpverlening.Amsterdam: Babylon-De Geus
