Bordo, S.
(1986) `The Cartersian Masculinization of Thought', Signs11: 439-456.
2.
Danzinger, K.
(1990) Constructing the Subject. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3.
Fine, M.
(1989) `Coping with Rape: Critical Pespectives on Consciousness', in R.K. Unger (ed.) Representations: Social Construct of Gender. Amityville, NY: Baywood, pp. 186-200.
4.
Haraway, D.
(1988) `Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective', Feminist Studies14(3): 575-599.
5.
Harding, S.
(1991) Whose Science, Whose Knowledge?Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
6.
Keller, E.F.
(1985) Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
Kuhn, T.
(1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Lather, P.
(1986) `Issues of Validity in Openly Ideological Research: Between a Rock and a Soft Place', Interchange17(4): 63-84.
9.
Lykes, M.B.
(1989) `Dialogue with Guatemalan Indian Women: Critical Perspectives on Constructing Collaborative Research', in R.K. Unger (ed.) Representations: Social Construct of Gender. Amityville, NY: Baywood, pp. 167-185.
10.
Strigel-Moore, R.H.
and Morawski, J.G. (1993) `Should We Define Feminism or Just Measure It?', unpublished paper, Department of Psychology, Wesleyan University.
11.
Turner, V.
(1977) `Variations on a Theme of Liminality', in S.F. Moore and B.G. Myerhoff (eds) Secular Ritual. Amsterdam: Van Gorcum, pp. 36-52.
