I. The Social Construction of Rape in Appeal Court Cases

Amir, M. (1971) Patterns of Forcible Rape. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Brownmiller, S. (1975) Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Edwards, S.M. (1981) Female Sexuality and the Law. Oxford: Robertson.

Gavey, N. (1992) `Technologies and Effects of Heterosexual Coercion', Feminism & Psychology 2(3): 325-351.

Henderson, L. (1992) `Rape and Responsibility', Law and Philosophy 11: 127-178.

Lees, S. (1994), `Why Men Get Away with Rape', The Guardian (16 Feb.): 9.

Los, M. (1990) `Feminism and Rape Law Reform', in L. Gelsthorpe and A. Morris (eds) Feminist Perspectives on Criminology. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Pollard, P. (1992) `Judgements About Victims and Attackers in Depicted Rapes: a Review', British Journal of Social Psychology 31: 307-326.

Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.

Prilleltensky, I. (1989) `Psychology and the Status Quo', American Psychologist 44(5): 795-802.

Reeves-Sanday, P. (1986) `Rape and the Silencing of the Feminine', in S. Tomaselli and R. Porter (eds) Rape: an Historical and Social Enquiry. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Russell, D. (1982) `Rape and the Masculine Mystique', in E. Whitelegg et al. (eds) The Changing Experience of Women. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Schacht, S.P. and Atchison, P.H. (1993) `Heterosexual Instrumentalism: Past and Future Directions', Feminism & Psychology 3(1): 37-53.

Scully, D. (1990) Understanding Sexual Violence-A Study of Convicted Rapists. London: Harper Collins.

Temkin, J. (1987) Rape and the Legal Process. London: Sweet and Maxwell.

Thornhill, R. and Thornhill, N.W. (1992) `The Evolutionary Psychology of Men's Coercive Sexuality', Behaviour and Brain Sciences 15: 363-421.

Tomaselli, S. and Porter, R. (1986) Rape: an Historical and Social Enquiry. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Wood, L.A. and Rennie, H. (1994) `Formulating Rape: the Discursive Construction of Victims and Villains', Discourse and Society 5(1): 125-148.