Sexual Stereotyping in the Dock: Observations on the APA Amicus Curiae Brief Prepared in the Case of Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins

American Psychological Association (1991) `In the Supreme Court of the United States, Price Waterhouse v. Ann Hopkins, Amicus Curiae Brief for the American Psychological Association', American Psychologist 46: 1061-1070.

Barrett, G.V. and Morris, S.B. (1993) `The American Psychological Association's Amicus Curiae Brief in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins; The Values of Science Versus the Values of the Law', Law and Human Behavior 17: 201-215.

Fiske, S.T. , Bersoff, D.N. , Borgida, E. , Deaux, K. and Heilman, M.E. (1993) `What Constitutes a Scientific Review? A Majority Retort to Barrett and Morris', Law and Human Behavior 17: 217-233.

Goodman, J. (1993) `Evaluating Psychological Expertise on Questions of Social Fact: The Case of Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins', Law and Human Behavior 17: 249-255.

Hopkins v. Price Waterhouse (1985) 618 F.Supp. 1109 (D.C.D.C). Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins (1989) 109 S.Ct 1775.

Saks, M.J. (1993) `Improving APA Science Translation Amicus Briefs', Law and Human Behavior 17: 235-247.

Schultz, V. (1991) `Telling Stories About Women and Work: Judicial Interpretations of Sex Segregation in the Workplace in Title VII Cases Raising the Lack of Interest Argument', in K.T. Bartlett and R. Kennedy (eds) Feminist Legal Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Smart, C. (1989) Feminism and the Power of Law. London: Routledge.