Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Research on men's role in pro-gender equality movements has been growing. Across several Western countries, qualitative research has identified among men a pervasive dualistic construction of feminism as good and reasonable versus bad and extreme. Less is known about the ways in which men's constructions of feminism intertwine with their positioning as feminists and their development of a feminist identity. Through individual semistructured interviews with 31 Italian cisgender men, we explored men's conceptualisation of feminism, their positioning and the path towards feminist identity development. Through reflexive thematic analysis and a constructionist epistemological approach, we identified three themes. (a) A binary construction of bad versus good feminism and the narrative ‘feminism is about women’ were shared among participants, regardless of feminist identification. (b) Participants drew on these constructions to justify their positions either as outsiders to feminism or as allies. Feminist participants undertook a complex process of negotiation of the space allowed to them within feminism, which influenced their level of engagement in feminist movements. (c) The pathway to feminist identification was described as an ongoing journey towards awareness, catalysed by past and present experiences. In this process, the development of a feminist consciousness became crucial to questioning the norms of traditional masculinity.

Keywords

feminism feminist identification Italy masculinity men reflexive thematic analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

V. N.

(2009). What’s in a label? Judgments of feminist men and feminist women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(2), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01490

Baird

M. K.

Szymanski

D. M.

Ruebelt

S. G.

(2007). Feminist identity development and practice among male therapists. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8(2), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.8.2.67

Basilicata

(2025, August 25). Not all men: significato e perché è una risposta problematica. Eroica Fenice. https://www.eroicafenice.com/riflessioni-culturali/not-all-men-significato-e-lassenza-di-necessita/

Berger

P. L.

Luckmann

(1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. First Anchor.

Braun

Clarke

(2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.

Braun

Clarke

(2024). Reporting guidelines for qualitative research: A values-based approach. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 22(2), 399–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2024.2382244

Calder-Dawe

Gavey

(2016). Jekyll and Hyde revisited: Young people’s constructions of feminism, feminists and the practice of ‘reasonable feminism’. Feminism & Psychology, 26(4), 487–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353516660993

Connell

R. W.

(2005a). Change among the gatekeepers: Men, masculinities, and gender equality in the global arena. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1801–1825. https://doi.org/10.1086/427525

Connell

R. W.

(2005b). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Routledge.

10.

Day

Wray

(2018). Fourth-wave feminism and postfeminism: Successes and failures. Transform: A Journal of the Radical Left, 4, 113–137. https://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/id/eprint/7735/

11.

Edley

Wetherell

(2001). Jekyll and Hyde: Men’s constructions of feminism and feminists. Feminism & Psychology, 11(4), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353501011004002

12.

Egeberg Holmgren

(2011). Cofielding in qualitative interviews: Gender, knowledge, and interaction in a study of (pro)feminist men. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(4), 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411401199

13.

Flick

(1997). The episodic interview. Methodology Institute.

14.

Flood

(1998, February 10). Frequently asked questions about pro-feminist men and pro-feminist men’s politics. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/444503/Frequently_Asked_Questions_About_Pro_Feminist_Men_and_Pro_Feminist_Mens_Politics_1997_

15.

Fullone

(2021, July 23). L’importanza del linguaggio nel trattamento della violenza contro le donne: Rape Culture, Victim Blaming e Vittimizzazione Secondaria [The importance of language in addressing violence against women: Rape culture, victim blaming and secondary victimisation]. Università degli Studi di Milano. https://ovd.unimi.it/commento/limportanza-del-linguaggio-nel-trattamento-della-violenza-contro-le-donne-rape-culture-victim-blaming-e-vittimizzazione-secondaria/

16.

Gergen

K. J.

Gergen

(2005). Social construction: A reader (2nd ed.). Sage.

17.

hooks

(2014). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics (2nd ed.). Routledge.

18.

Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (Istat). (2025). Il numero delle vittime e le forme della violenza [The number of victims and the forms of violence]. https://www.istat.it/statistiche-per-temi/focus/violenza-sulle-donne/il-fenomeno/violenza-dentro-e-fuori-la-famiglia/il-numero-delle-vittime-e-le-forme-di-violenza/

19.

Kelly

(2015). Feminist identity, collective action, and individual resistance among contemporary US feminists. Women’s Studies International Forum, 48, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.10.025

20.

Kimmel

Wade

(2018). Ask a feminist: Michael Kimmel and Lisa Wade discuss toxic masculinity. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 44(1), 233–254. https://doi.org/10.1086/698284

21.

Kimmel

M. S.

(2005). Why men should support gender equity. Women’s Studies, 103, 102–114. https://xyonline.net/sites/xyonline.net/files/Kimmel%2C%20Why%20men%20should%20support%20gender%20equity%2005.pdf

22.

Legge 19 luglio 2019, n. 69. (2019). Modifiche al codice penale, al codice di procedura penale e altre disposizioni in materia di tutela delle vittime di violenza domestica e di genere [Amendments to the Criminal Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure and other provisions concerning the protection of victims of domestic and gender-based violence]. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana, 173. https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2019/07/25/19G00076/sg

23.

Madsen

S. R.

Townsend

Scribner

R. T.

(2020). Strategies that male allies use to advance women in the workplace. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 28(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1060826519883239

24.

Mancini

(2023, December 23). Maschi contro la mascolinità tossica: Mica Macho e Maschile Plurale [Men against toxic masculinity: Mica Macho and Maschile Plurale]. Lampoon. https://lampoon.it/articolo/23/12/2023/uomini-maschi-contro-cultura-maschilista-tossica-patriarcato-micamacho-e-maschile-plurale/

25.

McRobbie

(2009). The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. Sage Publications.

26.

Ministero dell’Interno. (2025, January 7). Report Analisi Criminologica Della Violenza di Genere [Criminological analysis report on gender-based violence]. https://www.interno.gov.it/sites/default/files/2025-01/report_omicidi_al_31_12_2024.pdf

27.

Moore

Stathi

(2019). The impact of feminist stereotypes and sexual identity on feminist self-identification and collective action. The Journal of Social Psychology, 160(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2019.1644280

28.

O’Neill

(2015). Whither critical masculinity studies? Notes on inclusive masculinity theory, postfeminism, and sexual politics. Men and Masculinities, 18(1), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X14553056

29.

Pacilli

M. G.

(2020). Uomini duri: Il lato oscuro della mascolinità [Tough men: The dark side of masculinity]. Il Mulino.

30.

Pease

(2000). Researching profeminist men’s narratives. In Fawcett

Featherstone

Fook

Rossiter

(Eds.), Practice and research in social work: Postmodern feminist perspectives (pp. 138–161). Routledge.

31.

Quinn

J. E.

Radtke

H. L.

(2006). Dilemmatic negotiations: The (un)tenability of feminist identity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00281.x

32.

Reeves

(2022). Rhetoric, violence, and the subject of civility. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 19(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2022.2030062

33.

Riley

(2001). Maintaining power: Male constructions of ‘feminists’ and ‘feminist values’. Feminism & Psychology, 11(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353501011001004

34.

Robinson

O. C.

(2013). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543

35.

Semia Women’s Fund. (2023, November 24). The Italian feminist movement: Data, challenges and sustainability. https://semiafund.org/en/il-movimento-femminista-in-italia/

36.

Siegel

J. A.

, & Calogero

R. M.

(2021). Measurement of feminist identity and attitudes over the past half century: A critical review and call for further research. Sex Roles, 85, 248–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01219-w

37.

Siegel

J. A.

Elbe

C. I.

Calogero

R. M.

(2022). ‘It’s an ongoing process’: A qualitative analysis of men’s feminist identity growth. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 23(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000392

38.

Silver

E. R.

Chadwick

S. B.

van Anders

S. M.

(2019). Feminist identity in men: Masculinity, gender roles, and sexual approaches in feminist, non-feminist, and unsure men. Sex Roles, 80(5), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0932-6

39.

Szymanski

D. M.

(2004). Relations among dimensions of feminism and internalized heterosexism in lesbians and bisexual women. Sex Roles, 51, 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000037759.33014.55

40.

Tarrant

(2009). Men and feminism: Seal studies. Seal Press.

41.

Tilley

(2018). Feminist discourse analysis. In Ritzer

(Ed.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology (pp. 1–5). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeos1098

42.

Van Laar

, van Rossum

, Kosakowska-Berezecka

, Bongiorno

, & Block

(2024). MANdatory – Why men need (and are needed for) gender equality progress. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1263313. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1263313

43.

Volpato

(2022). Psicosociologia del maschilismo [Psychosociology of male chauvinism] (2nd ed.). Gius. Laterza & Figli Spa.

44.

Wetherell

Edley

(1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Feminism & Psychology, 9(3), 335–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353599009003012

45.

Wetherell

Edley

(2014). A discursive psychological framework for analyzing men and masculinities. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 15(4), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037148

46.

Wiley

Dunne

(2019). Comrades in the struggle? Feminist women prefer male allies who offer autonomy- not dependency-oriented help. Sex Roles, 80(11–12), 656–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0970-0

A space for men within feminism? A qualitative analysis of Italian men's accounts

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References