Designedly intentional misgendering in social interaction: A conversation analytic account

Abstract

Misgendering – moments where someone refers to, describes, or addresses a person as a gender different to the one they identify with – is a challenge that trans people can face in social interaction. Misgendering is an interactional phenomenon but has yet to be examined for how it unfolds in conversation. Utilizing conversation analysis, we focus on what we term designedly intentional misgendering. We show how speakers utilize turn-design features and sequential placement to mark a misgendering as intentional. We also document how such misgendering is mobilized for different actions in social interaction. Speakers can utilize designedly intentional misgendering to display negative interactional positions towards trans people and related matters. Trans people can respond to such misgendering by negatively characterizing another speaker and their conduct. Our work advances existing discussions around the intentionality of misgendering and trans people's interactional agency.

Keywords

Misgendering conversation analysis transgender social interaction intentionality agency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ansara

Y. G.

Hegarty

(2012). Cisgenderism in psychology: Pathologising and misgendering children from 1999 to 2008. Psychology and Sexuality, 3(2), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2011.576696

Ansara

Y. G.

Hegarty

(2014). Methodologies of misgendering: Recommendations for reducing cisgenderism in psychological research. Feminism & Psychology, 24(2), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353514526217

Billard

(2016). Writing in the margins: Mainstream news media representations of transgenderism. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4193–4218. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4q8f3

Capuzza

J. C.

(2015). What’s in a name? Transgender identity, metareporting, and the misgendering of Chelsea Manning. In Spencer

L. G.

Capuzza

J. C.

(Eds.), Transgender communication studies: Histories, trends and trajectories (pp. 93–110). Lexington Books.

Chang

Chung

(2015). Transgender microaggressions: Complexity of the heterogeneity of transgender identities. Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling, 9(3), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538605.2015.1068146

Conrod

(2020). Pronouns and gender in language. In Hall

Barrett

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and sexuality. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.013.63

Day

Gough

McFadden

(2003). Women who drink and fight: A discourse analysis of working-class women’s talk. Feminism & Psychology, 13(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353503013002002

Ekberg

(2016). Gendering occupations: Persistence and resistance of gender presumptions about members of particular healthcare professions. Gender and Language, 11(1), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.24082

Ellis

Bailey

McNeil

(2015). Trans people’s experiences of mental health and gender identity services: A UK study. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 19(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2014.960990

10.

Ericsson

(2018). The language of cisnormativity: Children and parents in interaction with a multimodal app. Gender and Language, 12(2), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.31827

11.

Freeman

Stewart

(2021). Toward a harm-based account of microaggressions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(5), 1008–1023. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211017099

12.

Galupo

M. P.

Pulice-Farrow

Lindley

(2020). “Every time I get gendered male, I feel a pain in my chest”: Understanding the social context for gender dysphoria. Stigma and Health, 5(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000189

13.

Garfinkel

(1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.

14.

Goodwin

(1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children. Indiana University Press.

15.

Gupta

(2019). Response and responsibility: Mainstream media and Lucy Meadows in a post-Leveson context. Sexualities, 22(1–2), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717740259

16.

Henderson

E. F.

(2022). “So it’s not necessarily about exclusion”: Category use in naturally occurring transphobic talk. Journal of Language and Discrimination, 6(2), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.21376

17.

Heritage

Greatbatch

(1986). Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 110–157. https://doi.org/10.1086/228465

18.

Hutchby

(1999). Beyond agnosticism?: Conversation analysis and the sociological agenda. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 32(1–2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1999.9683611

19.

Ingram

(2019). YouTube Commentaries on trans time-lapse videos: Transforming misgendering stances into pedagogical moments. Somatechnics, 9(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.3366/soma.2019.0264

20.

Jefferson

(1974). Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society, 3(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004334

21.

Jefferson

(2004). Glossary of transcription systems with an introduction. In Lerner

(Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). John Benjamins.

22.

Joyce

Humă

Ristimäki

H.-L.

de Almeida

F. F.

Doehring

(2021). Speaking out against everyday sexism: Gender and epistemics in accusations of “mansplaining”. Feminism & Psychology, 31(4), 502–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353520979499

23.

Kapusta

(2016). Misgendering and its moral contestability. Hypatia, 31(3), 502–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12259

24.

Katsiveli

(2021). “It is this ignorance we have to fight”: Emergent gender normativities in an interview with Greek transgender activists. Gender and Language, 15(2), 158–183. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.18949

25.

Kessler

McKenna

(1978). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. University of Chicago Press.

26.

Kitzinger

(2000). Doing feminist conversation analysis. Feminism & Psychology, 10(2), 163–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353500010002001

27.

Knott-Fayle

Peel

Witcomb

(2022). Prejudice in “inclusive” spaces: Cisgenderist collusion in the interview context. Feminism & Psychology, 32(2), 178–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535211063263

28.

Koshik

(2003). Wh-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies, 5(1), 51–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456030050010301

29.

Legewie

Nassauer

(2018). YouTube, Google, Facebook: 21st century online video research and research ethics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3130

30.

Mathers

(2017). Bathrooms, boundaries, and emotional burdens: Cisgendering interactions through the interpretation of transgender experience. Symbolic Interaction, 40(3), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.295

31.

McLemore

(2015). Experiences with misgendering: Identity misclassification of transgender spectrum individuals. Self and Identity, 14(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2014.950691

32.

Miller

(2015). Disciplining the transgender body: Transgender microaggressions in a transitional era. In Martinez

Miller

(Eds.), Gender in a transitional era: Changes and challenges (pp. 133–149). Lexington Books.

33.

Morris

Lindley

Galupo

M. P.

(2020). “Better issues to focus on”: Transgender microaggressions as ethical violations in therapy. The Counseling Psychologist, 48(6), 883–915. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000020924391

34.

Pollner

(1975). “The very coinage of your brain”: The anatomy of reality disjunctures. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 5(3), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839317500500304

35.

Potter

(1998). Discursive social psychology: From attitudes to evaluative practices. European Review of Social Psychology, 9(1), 233–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779843000090

36.

Pulice-Farrow

Clements

Galupo

M. P.

(2017). Patterns of transgender microaggressions in friendship: The role of gender identity. Psychology & Sexuality, 8(3), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2017.1343745

37.

Reynolds

(2011). Enticing a challengeable in arguments: Sequence, epistemics, and preference organization. Pragmatics, 21(3), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21.3.06rey

38.

Sacks

(1992). Lectures on conversation. Blackwell.

39.

Schilt

Westbrook

(2009). Doing gender, doing heteronormativity: “Gender normals”, transgender people, and the social maintenance of heterosexuality. Gender & Society, 23(4), 440–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209340034

40.

Serano

(2007). Whipping girl: A transsexual woman on sexism and the scapegoating of femininity. Seal Press.

41.

Shelton

(2015). Transgender youth homelessness: Understanding programmatic barriers through the lens of cisgenderism. Children and Youth Services Review, 59, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.10.006

42.

shuster

(2017). Punctuating accountability: How discursive aggression regulates transgender people. Gender & Society, 31(4), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243217717710

43.

shuster

Lamont

(2019). Sticks and stones break our bones, and words are damaging. In Pearce

Moon

Gupta

Steinberg

D. L.

(Eds.), The emergence of trans (1st ed., pp. 103–115). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315145815-11

44.

Simpson

Dewaele

J. M.

(2019). Self-misgendering among multilingual transgender speakers. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2019(256), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-2014

45.

Stockill

Kitzinger

(2007). Gendered “people”: How linguistically non-gendered terms can have gendered interactional relevance. Feminism & Psychology, 17(2), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507076555

46.

Stokoe

Smithson

(2001). Making gender relevant: Conversation analysis and gender categories in interaction. Discourse & Society, 12(2), 217–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012002005

47.

Stotzer

(2009). Violence against transgender people: A review of United States data. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14(3), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.01.006

48.

Vincent

(2018). Studying trans: Recommendations for ethical recruitment and collaboration with transgender participants in academic research. Psychology & Sexuality, 9(2), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2018.1434558

49.

Weatherall

(2015). Sexism in language and talk-in-interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34(4), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X15586574

50.

Zadrozny

(2018, June 23). YouTube tested, Trump approved: How Candace Owens suddenly became the loudest voice on the far right. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/youtube-tested-trump-approved-how-candace-owens-suddenly-became-loudest-n885166

51.

Zanghellini

(2020). Philosophical problems with the gender-critical feminist argument against trans inclusion. SAGE Open, 10(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020927029

52.

Zimman

(2019). Trans self-identification and the language of neoliberal selfhood: Agency, power, and the limits of monologic discourse. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2019(256), 147–175. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2018-2016