Female genital fashioning practices, a term encompassing a range of temporary and permanent options for cosmetic genital alteration, are becoming an increasingly prominent part of contemporary beauty regimes. Drawing on a series of 11 small focus groups and 10 interviews with 34 Australian women aged 18–30, this paper explores the ways that cisgender young women negotiate a combination of social pressures, pleasures and influences in their decisions to engage with genital fashioning. These pressures are described by women to emanate from broad social norms, sexual partners, family members, and peer groups. The women in this study demonstrate a nuanced and critical awareness of the cultural context which they inhabit but deploy postfeminist narratives of self-care and enjoyment to make sense of genital fashioning practices. The paper contributes to scholarship on postfeminism by demonstrating the ways that women creatively use the discursive tools available to enable critical reflection on notions of choice. At the same time, the findings in this study constitute an empirical contribution to critiques of postfeminism to reveal the limitations of postfeminist reasoning which ultimately works to curtail or impede the identification of structural problems and constraints.
Bay-ChengL. Y. (2015). The agency line: A neoliberal metric for appraising young women’s sexuality. Sex Roles, 73(7-8), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0452-6
BraunV. (2009). The women are doing it for themselves: The rhetoric of choice and agency around female genital “cosmetic” surgery. Australian Feminist Studies, 24(60), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164640902852449
5.
BraunV. (2010). Female genital cosmetic surgery: A critical review of current knowledge and contemporary debates. Journal of Women’s Health, 19(7), 1393–1407. https://doi.org/10.1089 = jwh.2009.1728
BraunV.KitzingerS. (2001a). “Snatch,” “hole,” or “honey-pot”? Semantic categories and the problem of nonspecificity in female genital slang. Journal of Sex Research, 38(3), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490109552082
8.
BraunV.KitzingerC. (2001b). The perfectible vagina: Size matters. Culture, Health & Sexuality: An International Journal for Research Intervention and Care, 3(3), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050152484704
9.
BraunV.TicklebankG.ClarkeV. (2013). “It shouldn’t stick out from your bikini at the beach”: Meaning, gender, and the hairy/hairless body. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(4), 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313492950
10.
BrumbergJ. (1998). The body project: An intimate history of American girls. Random House.
11.
BudgeonS. (2015). Individualized femininity and feminist politics of choice. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 22(3), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506815576602
CrannS. E.CunninghamS.AlbertA.MoneyD. M.O’DohertyK. C. (2018). Vaginal health and hygiene practices and product use in Canada: A national cross-sectional survey. BMC Women’s Health, 18(52). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0543-y
14.
DannC.CallaghanJ.FellinL. (2016). Tattooed female bodies: Considerations from the literature. Psychology of Women Section Review, 18(1), 43–51. https://repository.uel.ac.uk/item/8526q
DeMariaA. L.BerensonA. B. (2013). Prevalence and correlates of pubic hair grooming among low-income Hispanic, black, and white women. Body Image, 10(2), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.01.002
17.
EvansA.RileyS.ShankarA. (2010). Technologies of sexiness: Theorizing women’s engagement in the sexualization of culture. Feminism & Psychology, 20(1), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353509351854
18.
FahsB. (2011). Breaking body hair boundaries: Classroom exercises for challenging social constructions of the body and sexuality. Feminism & Psychology, 22(4), 482–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353511427293
19.
FahsB. (2014). Genital panics: Constructing the vagina in women’s qualitative narratives about pubic hair, menstrual sex, and vaginal self-image. Body Image, 11(3), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.03.002
GannonS.DaviesB. (2012). Postmodern, post-structural and critical theories. In Hesse-BiberS. N. (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis. SAGE.
GillR. (2009). Beyond the “sexualization of culture” thesis: An intersectional analysis of “sixpacks”, “midriffs” and “hot lesbians” in advertising. Sexualities, 12(2), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460708100916
GillR. C. (2007). Critical respect: The difficulties and dilemmas of agency and “choice” for feminism. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 14(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506807072318
26.
GillR.ScharffC. (2011). Introduction. In GillR.ScharffC. (Eds.), New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity (pp. 1–20). Palgrave Macmillan.
HerbenickD.HenselD.SmithN.SchickV.ReeceM.SandersS. A.FortenberryJ. D. (2012). Pubic hair removal and sexual behavior: Findings from a prospective diary study of sexually active women in the United States. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10(3), 678–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12031
29.
JacksonS.VaresT.GillR. (2012). “The whole playboy mansion image”: Girls’ fashioning and fashioned selves within a postfeminist culture. Feminism & Psychology, 23(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353511433790
30.
JamesA.PowerJ.WalingA. (2020). Conceptualising the continuum of female genital fashioning practices. Health Sociology Review, 29(3), 294–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2020.1811749
31.
KellyC. R.HoerlK. (2015). Shaved or saved?Disciplining Women’s Bodies. Women’s Studies in Communication, 38(2), 141–145. https://doi.org/10/10.1080/07491409.2015.1027088
LambS.PetersonZ. D. (2012). Adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment: Two feminists explore the concept. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), 703–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9995-3
34.
LiA. Y.BraunV. (2016). Pubic hair and its removal: A practice beyond the personal. Feminism & Psychology, 27(3), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353516680233
35.
MayersL. B.ChiffrillerS. H. (2008). Body art (body piercing and tattooing) among undergraduate university students: “Then and now”. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42(2), 201–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.014
36.
McDougallL. J. (2013). Towards a clean slit: How medicine and notions of normality are shaping female genital aesthetics. Culture, Health & Sexuality: An International Journal for Research, Intervention and Care, 15(7), 774–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2013.780639
MillnerV. S.EicholdB. H.SharpeT. H.LynnS. C. (2005). First glimpse of the functional benefits of clitoral hood piercings. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 193(3), 675–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.130
39.
MoranC.LeeC. (2018). “Everyone wants a vagina that looks less like a vagina”: Australian women’s views on genital dissatisfaction. Journal of Health Psychology, 23(2), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316637588
RodriguesS. (2012). From vaginal exception to exceptional vagina: The biopolitics of female genital cosmetic surgery. Sexualities, 15(7), 778–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460712454073
43.
RutherfordA. (2018). Feminism, pyschology, and the gendering of neoliberal subjectivity: From critique to disruption. Theory & Psychology, 28(5), 619–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318797194
44.
SchickV. R.RimaB. N.CalabreseS. K. (2011). Evulvalution: The portrayal of women’s external genitalia and physique across time and the current Barbie Doll ideals. The Journal of Sex Research, 48(1), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903308404
45.
SharpG.MattiskeJ.ValeK. (2016). Motivations, expectations, and experiences of labiaplasty: A qualitative study. The American Journal of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 36(8), 920–928. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw014
46.
SharpG.TiggemannM.MattiskeJ. (2016). Factors that influence the decision to undergo labiaplasty: Media, relationships, and psychological well-being. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 36(4), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjv270
47.
SullivanN. (2007). “The price to pay for our common good”: Genital modification and the somatechnologies of cultural (in)difference. Social Semiotics, 17(3), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330701448736
48.
TannerC.MaherJ.FraserS. (2013). Vanity: 21st century selves. Palgrave Macmillian.
49.
TerryG.BraunV.JayamahaS.MaddenH. (2017). Negotiating the hairless ideal in Āotearoa/New Zealand: Choice, awareness, complicity, and resistance in younger women’s accounts of body hair removal. Feminism & Psychology, 28(2), 272–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517732592
50.
TieferL. (2008). Female genital cosmetic surgery: Freakish or inevitable? Analysis from medical marketing, bioethics, and feminist theory. Feminism & Psychology, 18(4), 466–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353508095529
51.
ToerienM.WilkinsonS.ChoiP. Y. L. (2005). Body hair removal: The “mundane” production of normative femininity. Sex Roles, 52(5/6), 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-2682-5
52.
WilkinsonS. (1998). Focus groups in feminist research. Women’s Studies International Forum, 21(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00080-0
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
