In this paper we explore through discourse analysis the written personal narratives (vignettes) of “sketchy” sexual situations that students found themselves in as bystanders. We asked for these vignettes in a larger study examining the relationships between moral judgment/reasoning and intervening or not in situations of potential sexual assault. Through a Foulcauldian Discourse Analysis (FDA), we explore in these narratives discursive constructions, positioning of potential victims, potential perpetrators, and bystanders of sexual assault, as well as the action orientations these discourses suggest, and the implications for rape prevention programs.
AndersonL. A.WhistonS. C. (2005) Sexual assault prevention programs: A meta-analytic examination of their effectiveness. Psychology of Women Quarterly29: 374–388.
2.
ArmstrongE. A.HamiltonL.T.ArmstrongE. M.SeeleyJ. L. (2014) “Good girls,” gender, social class, and slut discourse on campus. Social Psychology Quarterly77(2): 100–122.
3.
BanyardV. L.MoynihanM. M.PlanteE. G. (2007) Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology35: 463–481.
4.
Bay-ChengL. A. (2015) The agency line: A neoliberal matrix for appraising young women's sexuality. Sex Roles73(7–8): 279–291.
5.
BogleK. A. (2008) Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus, New York: New York University Press.
6.
BurtM. R. (1980) Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology38(2): 217–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014). Preventing sexual violence on college campuses: Lessons from research and practice. Retrieved from https://www.notalone.gov/schools/.
9.
CissnerA. B. (2009) Evaluating the mentors in a violence prevention program, New York: Centre for Court Innovation.
Dills, J., Fowler, D., & Payne, G. (2016). Sexual violence on campus: Strategies for prevention. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (US), Division of Violence Prevention. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/campussvprevention.pdf.
12.
Gable, A. C., Lamb, A., Brodt, M., & Attwell, L. (2017). Intervening in a “sketchy situation”: Exploring the moral motivations of college bystanders of sexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. doi.org/10.1177/088626051773002.
13.
GarciaJ. R.ReiberC.MasseyS. G.MerriwetherA. M. (2012) Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology16(2): 161–176.
14.
GaveyN. (2005) Just sex? The cultural scaffolding of rape, New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
GillR. (2000) Discourse analysis. In: BauerM. W.GaskellG. (eds) Qualitative researching with text, image, and sound: A practical handbook, London: SAGE, pp. 172–190.
16.
HackmanC. L.PemberE.WilkersonA. H.BurtonW.UsdanS. L. (2017) Slut-shaming and victim-blaming: A qualitative investigation of undergraduate students' perceptions of sexual violence. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning17(6): 697–711.
17.
Jouriles, E. N., Krauss, A., Vu, N. L., Banyard, V. L., & McDonald, R., (2018). Bystander programs addressing sexual violence on college campuses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of program outcomes and delivery methods. Journal of American College Health. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1431906.
18.
KatzJ. (1995) Reconstructing masculinity in the locker room: The Mentors in Violence Prevention project. Harvard Educational Review65(2): 163–175.
19.
KatzJ.MooreJ. (2013) Bystander education training for campus sexual assault prevention: An initial meta-analysis. Violence and Victims28: 1054–1067.
20.
KrebsC.LindquistC.BerzofskyM.Shook-SaB.PetersonK.PlantyM.LangtonL.StroopJ. (2016) Campus Climate Survey Validation Study: Final technical report, Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice.
21.
MagnussonE.MarecekJ. (2015) Doing interview-based qualitative research: A learner's guide, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Malamuth, N. M., Huppin, M., & Linz, D. (2018). Sexual assault interventions may be doing more harm than good with high-risk males. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 41. doi: 10.1016/j.avb2018.05.010.
23.
MoynihanM. M.BanyardV. L. (2008) Community responsibility for preventing sexual violence: A pilot study with campus Greeks and intercollegiate athletes. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community36: 23–38.
24.
RingroseJ.ReynoldE. (2012) Slut-shaming, girl power and “sexualisation”: Thinking through the politics of the International SlutWalks with teen girls. Gender and Education24(3): 333–343. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2011.645023.
25.
SennC. Y.EliasziwA.BarataP. C.ThurstonW. E.Newby-ClarkI. R.RadtkeL.HobdenK. L. (2015) Efficacy of a sexual assault resistance program for university women. New England Journal of Medicine372: 2326–2335.
26.
WadeL. (2017) American hookup: The new culture of sex on campus, New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
27.
WilligC. (2013) Introducing qualitative research in psychology, 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
