In recent years, online media have offered to trans people helpful resources to create new political, cultural and personal representations of their biographies. However, the role of these media in the construction of their social and personal identities has seldom been addressed. Drawing on the theoretical standpoint of positioning theory and diatextual discourse analysis, this paper discusses the results of a research project about weblogs created by Italian trans women. In particular, the aim of this study was to describe the ways online resources are used to express different definitions and interpretation of transgenderism, transsexuality and gender transitioning. We identified four main positioning strategies: “Transgender”, “Transsexual before being a woman”, “A woman who was born male” and “Just a normal woman”. We conclude with the political implications of the pluralization of narratives about gender non-conformity. Specifically, we will highlight how aspects of neoliberal discourses have been appropriated and rearticulated in the construction of gendered subjectivities.
AlcoffL. M. (1988) Cultural feminism versus post-structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs13(3): 405–436. doi: 10.1086/494426.
2.
ArthursJ. (2004) Television and sexuality: Regulation and the politics of taste, New York, NY: Open University Press.
3.
AruneW. (2006) Transgender images in the media. In: CastanedaL.CampbellS. (eds) News and sexuality: Media portraits of diversity, Los Angeles: University of California Press, pp. 110–133.
AusloosJ. (2012) The ‘right to be forgotten’ – Worth remembering?Computer Law & Security Review28(2): 143–152. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2012.01.006.
6.
AustinA. (2016) “There I am”: A grounded theory study of young adults navigating a transgender or gender nonconforming identity within a context of oppression and invisibility. Sex Roles75: 215–230. doi: 10.1007/s11199-016-0600-7.
7.
BaptistaM. M. R.HimmelR. I. P. L. (2016) ‘For fun’: (De)humanizing Gisberta: The violence of binary gender social representation. Sexuality & Culture20: 639–656. doi: 10.1007/s12119-016-9350-5.
8.
Barker-PlummerB. (2013) Fixing Gwen: News and the mediation of (trans) gender challenges. Feminist Media Studies13(4): 710–724. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2012.679289.
9.
BarrettM. (1987) The concept of ‘difference’. Feminist Review26(1): 29–41. doi: 10.1057/fr.1987.18.
10.
BarriosB. (2004) Of flags: Online queer identities, writing classrooms, and action horizons. Computers and Composition21(3): 341–361. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2004.05.003.
11.
Barthes, R. (1964/1992). Elementi di Semiologia [Elements of semiology] (Trans. A. Bonomi). Torino: Einaudi.
12.
BillardT. J. (2016) Writing in the margins: Mainstream news media representation of transgenderism. International Journal of Communication10: 4193–4218. Retrieved from: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3461.
13.
BraunV. (2011) Petting a snake? Reflections on feminist critique, media engagement and “making a difference”. Feminism & Psychology22(4): 528–535. doi: 10.1177/0959353511427089.
14.
BuscarE.EnkeA. (2011) Unlikely sex change capitals of the world: Trinidad, United States, and Tehran, Iran, as twin yardsticks of homonormative liberalism. Feminist Studies37: 301–328. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23069902.
15.
ButlerJ. (1993) Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”, New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
CaniesoC. C. (2016) The right to be forgotten. In: MoranS. (ed) Ethical ripples of creativity and innovation, London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 193–199.
17.
CapuzzaJ. C. (2015) Who defines gender diversity? Sourcing routines and representation in mainstream U.S. news stories about transgenderism. International Journal of Transgenderism15(3–4): 115–128. doi: 10.1080/15532739.2014.946195.
18.
Codice in Materia di Protezione dei Dati Personali [Personal Data Protection Code]. Legislative decree 30 June 2003, n. 196.
19.
DaviesB.HarréR. (1990) Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour20(1): 43–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x.
20.
EkinsR.KingD. (2010) The emergence of new transgendering identities in the age of the internet. In: HinesS.SangerT. (eds) Transgender identities: Towards a social analysis of gender diversity, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 43–62.
21.
FentonN. (1995) Women, communication and theory: A glimpse of feminist approaches to media and communication studies. Feminism & Psychology5(3): 426–431. doi: 10.1177/0959353595053023.
22.
FinkM.MillerQ. (2014) Trans media moments: Tumblr, 2011–2013. Television and New Media Studies15(7): 611–626. doi:10.1177/1527476413505002.
23.
FoxJ.RalstonR. (2016) Queer identity online: Informal learning and teaching experiences of LGBTQ individuals on social media. Computers in Human Behaviour65: 635–642. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.009.
24.
FunkS.FunkJ. (2016) Transgender dispossession in transparent: Coming out as a euphemism for honesty. Sexuality & Culture20: 879–905. doi: 10.1007/s12119-016-9363-0.
25.
GardenM. (2011) Defining blog: A fool’s errand or a necessary undertaking. Journalism13(4): 483–499. doi: 10.1177/1464884911421700.
26.
GarosiE. (2011) Gender, sex and (hetero)sexuality: A critical lesson from the trans experience in Italy. In: SchererB.BallM. (eds) Queering paradigms II: Interrogating agendas, Oxford, UK: Peter Lang, pp. 99–112.
27.
GarosiE. (2012) The politics of gender transitioning in Italy. Modern Italy17(4): 465–478. doi: 10.1080/13532944.2012.706998.
28.
GreenM.BobrowiczA.AngC. S. (2015) The lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community online: Discussions of bullying and self-disclosure in YouTube videos. Behaviour & Information Technology34(7): 704–712. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2015.1012649.
HalberstamJ. (2005) In a queer time and place: Transgender bodies, subcultural lives, New York: New York University Press.
31.
HeglandJ. E.NelsonN. J. (2002) Cross-dressers in cyberspace: Exploring the internet as a tool for expressing gendered identity. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies7(2): 139–161. doi: 10.1023/A:1015845100237.
32.
Hilton-MorrowsW.BattlesK. (2015) Sexual identities and the media: An introduction, New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
JenkinsH. (2006) Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide, New York: New York University Press.
34.
JohnsonA. H. (2015) Normative accountability: How the medical model influences transgender identities and experiences. Sociological Inquiry9(9): 803–813. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12297.
35.
JohnsonA. H. (2016) Transnormativity: A new concept and its validation through documentary film about transgender men. Sociological Inquiry86(4): 465–491. doi: 10.1111/soin.12127.
36.
KelsoT. (2015) Still trapped in the U.S. media’s closet: Representations of gender-variant, pre-adolescent children. Journal of Homosexuality62(8): 1058–1097. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1021634.
37.
KingS. (1996) Researching internet communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of results. The Information Society12(2): 119–128. doi: 10.1080/713856145.
38.
LangerR.BeckmanS. C. (2005) Sensitive research topics: Netnography revisited. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal8(2): 189–203. doi: 10.1108/13522750510.
Lorenzetti, A. (2012). Diritti in transito. La condizione giuridica delle persone rransessuali [Rights in Transit: The Legal Status of Transsexuals]. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
41.
MackieV. (2008) How to be a girl: Mainstream media portrayals of transgendered lives in Japan. Asian Studies Review32: 411–423. doi: 10.1080/1035782080229853.
42.
MaliciL. (2014) Queer TV moments and family viewing in Italy. Journal of GLBT Family Studies10(1–2): 188–210. doi: 10.1080/1550428X.2014.857234.
43.
MallonG. P. (2009) Social work practice with transgender and gender variant youth, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
44.
ManduleyA. E.MertensA. E.PlanteI.SultanaA. (2018) The role of social media in sex education: Dispatches from queer, trans, and racialized communities. Feminism & Psychology28(1): 152–170. doi: 10.1177/0959353517717751.
45.
Mason-SchrockD. (1996) Transsexuals’ narrative construction of the “true self”. Social Psychology Quarterly59(3): 176–192. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2787018.
46.
McDonaldM. (2006) An other space. Between and beyond lesbian-normativity and trans-normativity. Journal of Lesbian Studies10(1–2): 201–214. doi: 10.1300/J155v10n01_10.
47.
McInroyL. B.CraigS. L. (2015) Transgender representation in offline and online media: LGBTQ youth perspectives. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment25(6): 606–617. doi: 10.1080/10911359.2014.995392.
48.
Mininni, G. (1992). Diatesti. Psicosemiotica del discorso sociale [Diatexts. Psycho-semiotics of social Ddiscourse]. Napoli: Liguori.
49.
Mininni, G. (2003). Il discorso come forma di vita [Discourse as a life form]. Napoli: Guida.
50.
MininniG. (2013) Psicologia culturale discorsiva [Discursive cultural psychology], Milano: FrancoAngeli.
51.
MocarskiR.ButlerS.EmmonsB.SmallwoodR. (2013) “A different kind of man”: Mediated transgendered subjectivity, Chaz Bono on dancing with the stars. Journal of Communication Inquiry37(3): 249–264. doi: 10.1177/0196859913489572.
52.
MorrowO.HawkinsR.KernL. (2015) Feminist research in online spaces. Gender, Place & Culture22(4): 526–543. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2013.879108.
53.
NamasteV. K. (2005) Beyond image content: Examining transsexuals’ access to the media. In: NamasteV. K. (ed) Sex change, social change: Reflections on identity, institutions, and imperialism, Toronto, Canada: Women’s Press, pp. 41–59.
54.
PapacharissiZ. (2009) The virtual sphere 2.0: The internet, the public sphere, and beyond. In: ChadwickA.HowardP. N. (eds) Routledge handbook of internet politics, London, UK: Routledge, pp. 230–245.
55.
Peters, M. A., & Appel, S. (1996). Positioning theory: Discourse, the subject and the problem of desire, Social Analysis, 40, 120–145. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23171700.
56.
PhillipsJ. (2006) Transgender on screen, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
57.
PotterJ.WetherellM. (1987) Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour, London: SAGE.
RingoP. (2002) Media roles in female-to-male transsexual and transgender identity formation. International Journal of Transgenderism6(3): 1, Retrieved from http://www.symposion.com/ijt/ijtvo06no03_01.htm.
SchiltK.WestbrookL. (2009) Doing gender, doing heteronormativity: “Gender normals,” transgender people, and the social maintenance of heterosexuality. Gender & Society23: 440–464. doi: 10.1177/0891243209340034.
63.
SenderK. (2012) No hard feelings: Reflexivity and queer affect in the new media landscape. In: RossK. (ed) The handbook of gender, sex, and media, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 207–225.
64.
SeranoJ. (2007) Whipping girl: A transsexual woman on sexism and the scapegoating of femininity, New York, NY: Seal Press.
65.
ShapiroE. (2004) ‘Trans’ cending barriers: Transgender organizing on the internet. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services16(3–4): 165–179. doi: 10.1300/J041v16n03_11.
66.
SieblerK. (2012) Transgender transitions: Sex/gender binaries in the digital age. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health16(1): 74–99. doi: 10.1080/19359705.2012.632751.
67.
SorapureM. (2003) Screening moments, scrolling lives: Diary writing on the web. Biography26(1): 1–23. doi: 10.1353/bio.2003.0034.
68.
StreitmatterR. (2009) From “perverts” to “'fab five”: The media’s changing depiction of gay men and lesbians, New York, NY: Routledge.
69.
StrykerS. (2006) (De)subjugated knowledges: An introduction to transgender studies. In: StrykerS.WhittleS. (eds) The transgender studies reader, New York, NY: Routledge.
VipondE. (2015) Resisting transnormativity: Challenging the medicalization and regulation of trans bodies. Theory in Action8(2): 21–44. doi: 10.3798/tia.1937-0237.15008.
72.
WarnerM. (1993) Introduction. In: WarnerM. (ed) Fear of a queer planet: Queer politics and social theory, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. vii–xxxi.
WesselsB. (2013) The reproduction and reconfiguration of inequality: Differentiation and class, status, and power in the dynamics of digital divides. In: RagneddaM.MuschertG. W. (ed) The digital divide: The internet and social inequality in international perspective, London, UK: Routledge, pp. 17–28.
75.
WestbrookL. (2010) Becoming knowably gendered: The production of transgender possibilities and constraints in the mass and alternative press from 1990–2005 in the United States. In: HinesS.SangerT. (eds) Transgender identities: Towards a social analysis of gender diversity, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 43–62.
76.
ZamperiniA.TestoniI.PrimoD.PrandelliM.MontiC. (2016) Because moms say so: Narratives, social recognition and praxis of Italian lesbian mothers. Journal of GLBT Family Studies12(1): 91–110.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
