BardwickJ. M. (1971) Psychology of women: A study of bio-cultural conflicts, New York, NY: Harper & Row.
2.
Bar-IlanJ. (2007) Which h-index? – A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics74(2): 257–271.
3.
BarnesM.GreerS. (2014) Does the future have a history of psychology? A report on teaching, research, and faculty positions in Canadian universities. History of Psychology17: 159–169.
4.
BenjaminL. T. (2007) A brief history of modern psychology, Malden, MA: Blackwell.
5.
BernsteinM.RussoN. (1974) The history of psychology revisited, or, up with our foremothers. American Psychologist29: 130–134.
6.
BlumenthalA. L. (1975) A reappraisal of Wilhelm Wundt. American Psychologist30: 1081–1086.
7.
BohanJ. S. (2002) Sex differences and/in the self: Classic themes, feminist variations, postmodern challenges. Psychology of Women Quarterly26(1): 74–88.
8.
DanzigerK. (1994) Does the history of psychology have a future?Theory & Psychology4: 467–484.
9.
EaglyA. H. (1987) Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation, Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
10.
EaglyA. H.EatonA.RoseS. M.RigerS.McHughM. C. (2012) Feminism and psychology: Analysis of a half-century of research on women and gender. American Psychologist67(3): 211–230.
11.
EmeR. F. (1979) Sex-differences in childhood psychopathology: A review. Psychological Bulletin86(3): 574–595.
12.
FeingoldA. (1994) Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin116(3): 429–456.
13.
FineC. (2010) Delusions of gender: How our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference, New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
14.
FineM.GordonS. M. (1989) Feminist transformations of/despite psychology. In: CrawfordM.GentryM. (eds) Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, pp. 146–174.
15.
FinisonL. J. (1976) Unemployment, politics, and the history of organized psychology. American Psychologist31: 747–755.
16.
FinisonL. J. (1978) Unemployment, politics, and the history of organized psychology II: The Psychologists League, the WPA, and the National Health Program. American Psychologist33: 471–477.
17.
FuchsA. H.VineyW. (2002) The course in the history of psychology: Present status and future concerns. History of Psychology5: 3–15.
18.
FurumotoL. (1979) Mary Whiton Calkins (1863–1930) fourteenth president of the American Psychological Association. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences15: 346–356.
19.
FurumotoL. (1989) The new history of psychology. In: CohenI. (eds) The G. Stanley Hall Lecture SeriesVol. 9Washington, DC: APA.
20.
Furumoto, L. (2003). Beyond great men and great ideas: History of psychology in sociocultural context. In P. Bronstein & K. Quina (Eds.). Teaching gender and multicultural awareness: Resources for the psychology classroom (pp. 113–124). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
21.
GergenK. J. (1982) Toward transformation in social knowledge, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
22.
HalpernD. F. (1986) Sex differences in cognitive abilities, Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
23.
Hare-MustinR. T.MarecekJ. (1988) The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology. American Psychologist43(6): 455–464.
24.
HarrisB. (1979) Whatever happened to little Albert?American Psychologist34: 151–160.
25.
HedgesL. V.NowellA. (1995) Sex-differences in mental test-scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science269(5220): 41–45.
26.
HegartyP. (2007) From genius inverts to gendered intelligence: Lewis Terman and the power of the norm. History of Psychology10: 132–155.
27.
HegartyP. (2012) Getting miles away from Terman: Did the CRPS fund Catharine Cox Miles’s unsilenced psychology of sex?History of Psychology15: 201–208.
28.
HegartyP. (2013) Gentlemen’s disagreement: Alfred Kinsey, Lewis Terman, and the sexual politics of smart men, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
HegartyP.WaltonZ. (2012) The consequences of predicting scientific impact in psychology using journal impact factors. Perspectives on Psychological Science7(1): 72–78.
30.
HermanE. (1995) The curious courtship of psychology and women’s liberation. In: HermanE. (eds) The romance of American psychology, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 276–303.
31.
HicksD.WoutersP.WaltmanL.de RijckeS.RafolsI. (2015) Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature News520: 429–431.
32.
Hollingworth, L. S. (1914). Functional periodicity: An experimental study of the mental and motor abilities of women during menstruation. Teachers College, Columbia University Contributions to Education, No. 69. Retrieved from http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Hollingworth/Periodicity/.
33.
HydeJ. S. (2005) The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist60(6): 581–592.
34.
HydeJ. S.LindbergS. M.LinnM. C.EllisA. B.WilliamsC. C. (2008) Diversity: Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science321(5888): 494–495.
35.
JohnsonA.JohnstonE. (2010) Unfamiliar feminisms: Revisiting the National Council of Women Psychologists. Psychology of Women Quarterly34(3): 311–327.
36.
Krampen, G. (2016). Scientometric trend analyses of publications on the history of psychology: Is psychology becoming an unhistorical science? Scientometrics. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-016-1834-4.
37.
LewinM. (1984) In the shadow of the past: Psychology examines the sexes, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
38.
MednickM. T.WeissmanH. J. (1975) The psychology of women: Selected topics. Annual Review of Psychology26: 1–18.
39.
MorawskiJ. G. (1985) The measurement of masculinity and femininity: Engendering categorical realities. Journal of Personality53: 196–223.
40.
MorawskiJ. G.AgronickG. (1991) A restive legacy: The history of feminist work in experimental and cognitive psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly15: 567–579.
41.
MorawskiJ. G. (1994) Practicing feminisms, reconstructing psychology: Notes on a liminal science, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
42.
NicholsonI. (2001) ‘Giving up maleness:’ Abraham Maslow, masculinity, and the boundaries of psychology. History of Psychology4: 79–91.
43.
NicholsonI. (2011) “Shocking” masculinity: Stanley Milgram, “Obedience to Authority”, and the “crisis of manhood” in Cold War America. Isis102: 238–268.
44.
Nolen-HoeksemaS. (1990) Sex differences in depression, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
45.
ParleeM. B. (1975) Psychology. Signs1: 119–138.
46.
PettitM. (2008) The new woman as “tied up dog”: Amy E. Tanner’s situated knowledges. History of Psychology11: 145–163.
47.
PettitM. (2012) The queer life of a lab rat. History of Psychology15: 217–227.
48.
PettitM.DavidsonI. (2014) Can the history of psychology have an impact?Theory & Psychology24: 709–716.
49.
PettitM.VigorJ. (2015) Pheromones, feminism and the many lives of menstrual synchrony. BioSocieties18: 223–237.
50.
PickrenW. E.RutherfordA. (2010) A history of modern psychology in context, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
51.
RosenbergR. (1982) Beyond separate spheres: Intellectual roots of modern feminism, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
52.
RutherfordA. (2013) Critical historiography. In: TeoT. (eds) Encyclopedia of critical psychologyVol. 2New York, NY: Springer SBM.
53.
RutherfordA. (2015) Maintaining masculinity in mid-20th century American psychology: Edwin Boring, scientific eminence, and the “woman problem.”. Osiris30: 250–271.
54.
RutherfordA.CapdevilaR.UndurtiV.PalmaryI. (2011) Handbook of international feminisms: Perspectives on psychology, women, culture, and rights, New York, NY: Springer SBM.
55.
RutherfordA.GranekL. (2010) Emergence and development of the psychology of women. In: ChrislerJ.McCrearyD. (eds) Handbook of gender research in psychology, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 19–41.
56.
RutherfordA.MarecekJ.SheeseK. (2012) Psychology of women and gender. In: FreedheimD. K.WeinerI. B. (eds) Handbook of psychology, Volume 1: History of Psychology, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley, pp. 279–301.
57.
RutherfordA.PettitM. (2015) Feminism and/in/as psychology: The public sciences of sex and gender. History of Psychology18(3): 223–237.
58.
RutherfordA.Vaughn-BlountK.BallL. C. (2010) Responsible opposition, disruptive voices: Science, activism, and the history of feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly34: 160–173.
59.
RutherfordA.Vaughn-JohnsonK.RodkeyE. (2015) Does psychology have a gender?The Psychologist28(6): 2–4.
60.
SamelsonF. (1980) J. B. Watson’s little Albert, Cyril Burt’s twins, and the need for a critical science. American Psychologist35: 619–625.
61.
ScottJ. W. (1986) Gender: A useful a category of historical analysis. The American Historical Review91: 1053–1075.
62.
SeagoeM. V. (1950) Introduction. Journal of Social Issues6(3): 2.
63.
ShermanJ. A. (1971) On the psychology of women: A survey of empirical studies, Springfield, IL: Thomas.
64.
ShieldsS. A. (1975a) Functionalism, Darwinism, and the psychology of women: A study in social myth. American Psychologist30: 739–754.
65.
ShieldsS. A. (1975b) Ms. Pilgrim’s progress: The contributions of Leta Stetter Hollingworth to the psychology of women. American Psychologist30: 852–857.
66.
ShieldsS. A. (1984) “To pet, coddle, and ‘do for’”: Caretaking and the concept of maternal instinct. In: LewinM. (eds) In the shadow of the past: Psychology examines the sexes, New York, NY: Columbia University Press, pp. 256–273.
67.
ShieldsS. A. (2007) Passionate men, emotional women: Psychology constructs gender difference in the late 19th century. History of Psychology10: 92–110.
68.
Shields, S. (2011). Interview by A. Rutherford [Video Recording]. Psychology’s Feminist Voices Oral History and Online Archive Project, 4 March. Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved from: http://www.feministvoices.com/stephanie-shields/.
69.
SimontonD. K. (1994) Greatness: Who makes history and why, New York, NY: Guilford.
70.
SmallH. (1973) Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science24(4): 265–269.
71.
TavrisC. (1993) The mismeasure of woman. Feminism & Psychology3(2): 149–168.
72.
ThompsonH. B. (1903) The mental traits of sex: An empirical investigation of the normal mind in men and women, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
73.
UngerR. K. (1979) Toward a redefinition of sex and gender. American Psychologist34(11): 1085–1094.
74.
UngerR. K. (2010) Leave no text behind: Teaching the psychology of women during the emergence of second wave feminism. Sex Roles62: 153–158.
75.
YoderJ. D.KahnA. S. (2003) Making gender comparisons more meaningful: A call for more attention to social context. Psychology of Women Quarterly27: 281–290.
76.
YoungR. M. (1966) Scholarship and the history of the behavioural sciences. History of Science5: 1–51.