AppelJ. (2004) A duty to kill? A duty to die? Rethinking the euthanasia debate of 1906. Bulletin of the History of Medicine78(3): 610–634.
2.
Battin, M. P., van der Heide, A., Ganzini, L, van der Wal, G., & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.D. (2007). Legal physician assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups. Journal of Medical Ethics 33, 591--597.
3.
BenderL. (1992) A feminist analysis of physician-assisted dying and voluntary active euthanasia. Tennessee Law Review59: 519–546.
4.
DavisC. (2010) Charlotte Perkins Gilman: A Biography, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
GoldenC. (2014) Obituary: Sandra Lipsitz Bem – 1944–2014. The Psychologist27(11): 811.
6.
MartinN. (2002) Physician assisted suicide and euthanasia: Weighing feminist concerns. In: FioreR.NelsonH. L. (eds) Recognition, responsibility and rights: Feminist ethics and social theory, New York: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 131–223.
7.
MilesS. H.AugustA. (1990) Courts, gender, and “the right to die”. Law, Medicine, and Health Care18(1–2): 85–95.
ParksJ. A. (2000) Why gender matters to the Euthanasia Debate: On decisional capacity and the rejection of the woman's death request. Hastings Center Report30(1): 30–36.
11.
RaymondD. (1999) ‘Fatal practices’: A feminist analysis of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. Hypatia14(2): 1–25.
WolfS. (1996) Gender, feminism, and death: Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. In: WolfS. (ed.) Feminism & Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 282–317.