The fathers’ rights movement is a worldwide phenomenon that takes a particular form in our geopolitical region. Responding initially to an apparent judicial preference for mothers to have custody of children, the movement grew alongside, and in resistance to, the women’s movement. In this paper, we analyse how texts of fathers’ rights discourse strategically appropriate egalitarianism in the context of gendered struggles over rights within the nuclear family. Texts from four fathers’ rights websites are engaged to locate, construct and critique the discursive power of the movement in Aotearoa/New Zealand. We discuss examples of strategies that appropriate egalitarianism, engage quantifying logic, and demonise women and argue how the fathers’ rights sites exemplify resistance to the impact of the women’s movement on Family Court and criminal justice interventions into violence against women at home.
AdamsM.ColtraneS. (2007) Framing divorce reform: Media, morality, and the politics of family. Family Process46(1): 17–34.
2.
BanwellS. (2010) Gendered narratives: Women’s subjective accounts of their use of violence and alternative aggression(s) within their marital relationships. Feminist Criminology5(2): 116–134.
3.
BertoiaC.DrakichJ. (1993) The fathers’ rights movement: Contradictions in rhetoric and practice. Journal of Family Issues14: 592–615.
4.
Braidotti, R. (1996). Signs of women and traces of doubt: On teratology and embodied differences. In N. Lykke & R. Braidotti (Eds.), Between monsters, goddesses and cyborgs (pp. 135–152). Feminist confrontations with science, medicine and cyberspace. London, UK: Zed.
5.
BurmanE.ChantlerK. (2005) Domestic violence and minoritisation: Legal and policy barriers facing minoritized women leaving violent relationships. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry28: 59–74.
6.
CollierR. (2009) Fathers' rights, gender and welfare: Some questions for family law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law31(4): 357–371.
7.
ConnellR. W.MesserschmidtJ. W. (2005) Hegemonic masculinity rethinking the concept. Gender & Society19(6): 829–859.
8.
CoombesL.MorganM. (2004) Narrative form and the morality of psychology’s gendering stories. Narrative Inquiry14: 303–322.
9.
CoombesL.MorganM.BlakeD.McGrayS. (2009) Enhancing Safety: Survivors’ experiences of Viviana’s advocacy at the Waitakere family violence court, Palmerston North, Aotearoa/NZ: Massey University.
10.
CreedB. (1993) The monstrous-feminine. Film, feminism, psychoanalysis, London: Routledge.
11.
CrowleyJ. E. (2009) Fathers' rights groups, domestic violence and political countermobilization. Social Forces88(2): 723–755.
12.
DavisW. (2004) Gender bias, fathers’ rights, domestic violence and the family court. Butterworths Family Law Journal4: 299–312.
13.
DeKeseredyW. S. (2011) Feminist contributions to understanding woman abuse: Myths, controversies, and realities. Aggression and Violent Behavior16: 297–302.
14.
DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (1998). Measuring the extent of woman abuse in intimate heterosexual relationships: A critique of the conflict tactics scales. In VAW Net Applied Research Forum: National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women. Retrieved from http://www.csaj.org/documents/178.pdf.
15.
DoogueJ. (2004) The domestic violence act 1995 and s 16B of the Guardianship Act 1968 – The effect on children’s relationships with their non-custodial parent. Butterworths Family Law Journal4: 243–248.
16.
DragiewiczM. (2011) Equality with a vengeance. Men’s rights groups, battered women, and antifeminist backlash, New Hampshire, USA: Northeastern University Press.
17.
DuttonM.GoodwinL. A. (2005) Coercion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization. Sex Roles52(11–12): 743–756.
18.
EikhofD. R. (2012) A double-edged sword: Twenty-first century workplace trends and gender equality. Gender in Management: An International Journal27(1): 7–22.
19.
ElizabethV.GaveyG.TolmieJ. (2010) Between a rock and a hard place: Resident mothers and the moral dilemmas they face during custody disputes. Feminist Legal Studies18: 253–274.
20.
ElizabethV.GaveyG.TolmieJ. (2011) Gendered dynamics in family court counselling. New Zealand Journal of Counselling31(2): 1–20.
21.
ElizabethV.GaveyG.TolmieJ. (2012a) “… He's just swapped his fists for the system.'' The governance of gender through custody law. Gender & Society26: 239–260.
22.
ElizabethV.GaveyG.TolmieJ. (2012b) The gendered dynamics of power in disputes over the postseparation care of children. Violence Against Women18(4): 459–481.
23.
Flood, M. (1999). Claims about husband battering. DVIRC Newsletter, 2–8 Summer. Melbourne: Domestic Violence and Incest Resource Centre. Retrieved from http://www.xyonline.net/husbandbattering.shtml.
24.
Flood, M. (2003). Fatherhood and fatherlessness. Discussion Paper No. 59. Canberra, Australia: The Australia Institute.
25.
Flood, M. (2004). Backlash: Angry men's movements. In S. E. Rossi (Ed.), The battle and backlash rage on: Why feminism cannot be obsolete (pp. 261--278). Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris Press.
26.
FloodM. (2010) “Fathers’ rights” and the defence of paternal authority in Australia. Violence Against Women16(3): 328–347.
27.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
28.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. C. Gordon (Ed., & Trans.); L. Marshall, J. Mepham, & K. Soper (Trans.). New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
29.
Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality, volume 1: The will to knowledge. R. Hurley (Trans.). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
30.
GaveyN. (1989) Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis: Contributions to feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly13(4): 459–475.
31.
GirardA. L. (2008) Backlash or equality: The influence of men’s and women’s rights discourses on domestic violence legislation in Ontario. Violence Against Women15: 5–23.
32.
GregoryA.MilnerS. (2011) What is “new” about fatherhood?: The social construction of fatherhood in France and the UK. Men and Masculinities14: 588–606.
33.
GroszE. (1989) Sexual subversions, Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
34.
HarrisonC. (2008) Implacably hostile or appropriately protective? Women managing child contact in the context of domestic violence. Violence Against Women14(4): 381–405.
35.
HookwayN. (2008) ‘Entering the blogosphere’: Some strategies for using blogs in social research. Qualitative Research8: 91–113.
36.
JaffeP. G.CrooksC. V. (2004) Partner violence and child custody cases: A cross-national comparison of legal reforms and issues. Violence Against Women10: 917–934.
37.
JaffeP. G.JohnstonJ. R.CrooksC. V.BalaN. (2008) Custody disputes involving allegations of domestic violence: Toward a differentiated approach to parenting plans. Family Court Review46(3): 500–522.
38.
Justo, D., Lucas, D., Salizzo, J., & McCartney, L. (2009). What's in it for the women? In A. Day, P. O'Leary, D. Chung, & D. Justo (Eds.), Domestic violence - Working with men research, practice experiences and integrated responses (pp. 35--43). Sydney, Australia: The Federation Press.
39.
KayeM.TolmieJ. (1998a) Fathers’ rights groups in Australia and their engagement with issues in family law. Australian Journal of Family Law12: 19–67.
40.
KayeM.TolmieJ. (1998b) Discoursing dads: The rhetorical devices of fathers’ rights groups. Melbourne University Law Review22: 162–194.
41.
KhaderS. J. (2008) When equality justifies women's subjection: Luce Irigaray's critique of equality and the fathers’ rights movement. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy23(4): 48–74.
42.
LindhorstT.TajimaE. (2008) Reconceptualizing and operationalizing context in survey research on intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence23(3): 362–388.
43.
McHughM. C.LivingstonN. A.FordA. (2005) A postmodern approach to women's use of violence: Developing multiple and complex conceptualizations. Psychology of Women Quarterly29(3): 323–336.
44.
Magdol, L., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Newman, D. L., Fagan, J., & Silva, P. A. (1997). Gender differences in partner violence in a birth cohort of 21-year-olds: Bridging the gap between clinical and epidemiological approaches. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 68--78.
Nicolson, P. (1992). Feminism and academic psychology: Towards a psychology of women? In K. Campbell (Ed.), Critical feminism: Argument in the disciplines (pp. 53--82). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
47.
ParkerI. (2005) Qualitative psychology: Introducing radical research, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
48.
PenceE.PaymarM. (1986) Power and control: Tactics of men who batter, Duluth, MN: Minnesota Program Development.
49.
PetersM. A. (2006) Lyotard, nihilism and education. Studies in Philosophy and Education25: 303–314.
50.
RamazanogluC. (1992) On feminist methodology: Male reason versus female empowerment. Sociology26(2): 207–212.
51.
RosenL. N.DragiewiczM.GibbsJ. C. (2009) Fathers’ rights groups: Demographic correlates and impact on custody policy. Violence Against Women15: 513–531.
52.
Shepard, M. F., & Pence, E. L. (1999). An introduction: Developing a coordinated community response. In M. F. Shepard & E. L. Pence (Eds.), Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond (pp. 3--24). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
SmartC. (2004) Equal shares: Rights for fathers or recognition for children?Critical Social Policy24: 484–503.
54.
Smart, C. (2006). The ethic of justice strikes back. In A. Diduck & K. O'Donovan (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on family law (pp. 123--138). London, UK: Routledge-Cavendish.
55.
WalkerL. E. (1979) The battered woman, New York, NY: Harper & Row.
56.
WarringtonM. (2001) ‘I must get out’: The geographies of domestic violence. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers26(3): 365–382.
57.
WhartonS. (2012) Latent consensus in public debated: Media discussion of fathers’ rights in the UK. Communication, Culture and Critique5: 427–444.
58.
WilkinsonD.ThelwallM. (2011) Researching personal information on the public web: Methods and ethics. Social Science Computer Review29: 387–401.
59.
Williams, G. I., & Williams, R. H. (1995). “All we want is equality”: Rhetorical framing in the fathers' rights movement. In J. Best (Ed.), Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems (2nd ed., pp. 191--212). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
60.
YoungI. M. (1990) Justice and the politics of difference, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
