This study examined how men accounted for their violent behaviours against their intimate female partners. In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 12 men from three men’s groups in Johannesburg, South Africa. All the men self-reported that they had committed acts of intimate partner violence previously, and the majority were from low-income, township settings. Dissociations, justifications and confessions featured as the predominant accounting forms that worked to transform participants’ subject positions from the ‘violent abuser’ to the ‘legitimately violent partner’ and even to the ‘changed man’. Attention is accorded to how gender ideologies and heteropatriarchal discourses legitimating male violence against women were reinforced, yet were at times challenged within their talk and through rhetorical devices. In line with a poststructuralist reading, the study highlights the complexities underpinning men’s varied meanings of violence. On the one hand, it reveals the agentic shifting of identities. On the other, it highlights the social discourses that are embedded in men’s talk and therefore inscribed into male subjectivities.
AdamsPJTownsAGaveyN (1995). Dominance and entitlement: The rhetoric men use to discuss their violence towards women. Discourse & Society6(3): 387–406.
2.
AhmedBReaveyPMajumdarA (2009). Constructions of ‘culture’ in accounts of South Asian women survivors of sexual violence. Feminism & Psychology19(1): 7–28.
3.
AndersonKLUmbersonD (2001). Gendering violence: Masculinity and power in men’s accounts of domestic violence. Gender & Society15(3): 358–380.
4.
AnglessTMachonachieMvan ZylM (1998). Battered women seeking solutions: A South African study. Violence Against Women4: 637–658.
5.
BartelsRParsonsC (2009). The social construction of a serial killer. Feminism & Psychology19(2): 267–280.
6.
BesleyT (2005). Foucault, truth telling and technologies of the self in schools. Journal of Educational Enquiry6(1): 76–89.
7.
BoonzaierF (2008). ‘If the man says you must sit, then you must sit’: The relational construction of woman abuse: Gender, subjectivity and violence. Feminism & Psychology18(2): 183–206.
8.
BoonzaierFde la ReyC (2004). Woman abuse: The construction of gender in women and men’s narratives of violence. South African Journal of Psychology34(3): 443–463.
9.
BuchbinderEEisikovitsZ (2004). Between normality and deviance: The breakdown of batterers’ identity following police intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence19(4): 443–467.
10.
BurrV (1995). An Introduction to Social Constructionism. London. Routledge.
11.
CavanaghKDobashREDobashRPLewisR (2001). ‘Remedial work’: Men’s strategic responses to their violence against intimate female partners. Sociology35(3): 695–714.
12.
ConnellRW (1987). Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics. Stanford, CA. Polity Press.
13.
DangorZHoffLScottR (1998). Woman abuse in South Africa. Violence Against Women4(2): 125–152.
14.
EdinKELalosAHögbergUDahlgrenL (2008). Violent men: Ordinary and deviant. Journal of Interpersonal Violence23(2): 225–244.
EnanderV (2011). Leaving Jekyll and Hyde: Emotion work in the context of intimate partner violence. Feminisim & Psychology21(1): 29–48.
17.
FlinckAPaavilainenE (2008). Violent behavior of men in their intimate relationships, as they experience it. American Journal of Men’s Health2(3): 244–253.
18.
FloodM (2011). Building men’s commitment to ending sexual violence against women. Feminism & Psychology21(2): 262–267.
19.
FoucaultM (1977). Discipline and Punish. New York. Vintage.
20.
GaddD (2002). Masculinities and violence against female partners. Social & Legal Studies11(1): 61–80.
21.
GaveyN (1989). Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly13(4): 459–475.
22.
GoodGEThomsonDABraithwaiteAD (2005). Men and therapy: Critical concepts, theoretical frameworks, and research recommendations. Journal of Clinical Psychology61(6): 699–711.
23.
GoodrumSUmbersonDAndersonK (2001). The batterer’s view of the self and others in domestic violence. Sociological Inquiry71(2): 221–240.
24.
HearnJ (1998). The Violences of Men. London. Sage.
25.
HollwayW(1984). Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. In: HenriquesJHollwayWUrwinCVennCWalkerdineV (eds) Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation and Subjectivity. London. Methuen, pp. 227–263.
26.
HolmaJPartanenTWahlströmJLaitilaASeikkulaJ(2006). Narratives and discourses in groups for male batterers. In: LipshitzMEkströmI (eds) Domestic Violence and its Reverberations. New York. Nova Science Publishers, pp. 59–84.
27.
HydénM(1994). Woman battering as a marital act: Interviewing and analysis in context. In: RiessmanCK (ed.) Qualitative Studies in Social Work Research. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage, pp. 95–112.
28.
LeCouteurAOxladM (2011). Managing accountability for domestic violence: Identities, membership categories and morality in perpetrators’ talk. Feminism & Psychology21(1): 5–28.
29.
MorellROuzganeL(2005). African masculinities: An introduction. In: MorellROuzganeL (eds) African Masculinities. New York. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–20.
30.
MorrisseyER (1986). Power and control through discourse. Contemporary Crises10: 157–179.
31.
MullaneyJL (2007). Telling it like a man: Masculinities and battering men’s accounts of their violence. Men and Masculinities10(2): 222–247.
32.
MurakamiK (2007). Positioning in accounting for redemption and reconciliation. Culture & Psychology13(4): 431–452.
33.
ParkerI (1992). Discourse Dynamics: Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology. London. Routledge.
34.
PaulseJLazarusS (2010). Colonization, apartheid and historical trauma as risks for male violence: Report on the proceedings of symposium. African Safety Promotion Journal8(1): 49–61.
35.
PotterJ(1997). Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. In: SilvermanD (ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London. Sage, pp. 200–221.
36.
Potter J and Wetherell W (1990) Discourse: Noun, verb or social practice? Philosophical Psychology 3(2/3): 205–217.
37.
ReitzRR (1999). Batterers’ experiences of being violent: A phenomenological study. Psychology of Women Quarterly23: 143–165.
38.
RudeD (1997). Reasonable men and provocative women: An analysis of gendered domestic homicide in Zambia. Journal of Southern African Studies25(1): 7–27.
39.
SathiparsadR (2008). Developing alternative masculinities as a strategy to address gender-based violence. International Social Work51: 348–359.
40.
SheferTCrawfordMStrebelASimbayiLCDwadwa-HendaNCloeteAKaufmanMRKalichmanSC (2008). Gender, power and resistance to change among two communities in the Western Cape, South Africa. Feminism & Psychology18: 157–182.
41.
Stevens G (2008) Men and meanings of murder: Discourses and power in narratives of male homicide in South Africa. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of South Africa, Pretoria.
42.
Towns A and Scott H (2008) The Culture of Cool: Getting in Early to Prevent Domestic Violence. Wellington: New Zealand Family Violence Clearinghouse.
43.
VettenL (2005). Addressing domestic violence in South Africa: Reflections on strategy and practice. Paper presented at the Expert Group Meeting on Violence Against Women: Good Practices in Combating and Eliminating Violence Against Women. 17–20. May, Vienna, Austria.
44.
WalkerL (2005). Men behaving differently: South African men since 1994. Culture, Health & Seuality7(3): 225–238.
45.
WeedonC (1987). Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Oxford. Basil Blackwell.
46.
WetherellM (1998). Positioning and interpretive repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society9(3): 387–412.
47.
WetherellMEdleyN (1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Feminism and Psychology9(3): 335–356.
48.
WilligC (2001). Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology: Adventures in Theory and Method. Buckingham. Open University Press.
49.
WinsladeJM (2005). Utilising discursive positioning in counselling. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling33(3): 351–364.
50.
WinstokZEisikovitsZGellesR (2002). Structure and dynamics of escalation from the batterer’s perspective. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services83(2): 129–141.
51.
WoodJT (2004). Monsters and victims: Male felons’ accounts of intimate partner violence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships21(55): 555–576.
52.
WoodKJewkesR(2001). ‘Dangerous’ love: Reflections on violence among xhosa township youth. In: MorrellR (ed.) Changing Men in Southern Africa. Pietermaritzburg. University of Natal Press, pp. 317–336.
