Courses in women’s studies and gender studies within US contexts have long prioritized content that critically examines the social construction of bodies and sexualities, consciousness-raising about how social identities interface with disciplinary and institutional practices, and the notion that ‘the personal is political.’ This article examines the social and pedagogical implications of an extra-credit assignment where I asked women to grow out their body hair and men to remove their body hair for 10 weeks in several upper-division women’s studies courses. Students’ response papers and weekly logs from 87 students over four semesters highlighted the social policing of gender and sexual identity, pervasive disgust and misinformation about body hair, raced and classed dimensions of students’ experiences, configurations of masculinity as agentic and powerful, and postexperiential reflections on challenging social norms. This assignment showed how temporary excursions into rebelling against body norms can generate sociopolitical awareness, particularly for living as Other (e.g. queerness, fatness, disability). I also consider implications for ‘ripple effect pedagogy’ and ‘peer generated pedagogy,’ along with pedagogical reflections about using the assignment as a consciousness-raising tool in feminist classrooms.
AndersonK (2008). From metrosexual to retrosexual: The importance of shifting male gender roles to feminism. Thinking Gender Papers1: 1–10.
3.
BasowSA (1991). The hairless ideal: Women and their body hair. Psychology of Women Quarterly15: 83–96.
4.
BasowSABramanAC (1998). Women and body hair: Social perceptions and attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly22(4): 637–645.
5.
BasowSAWillisJ (2001). Perceptions of body hair on white women: Effects of labeling. Psychological Reports89(3): 571–576.
6.
BoroughsMCafriGThompsonJK (2005). Male body depilation: Prevalence and associated features of body hair removal. Sex Roles52: 637–644.
7.
BryantAN (2003). Changes in attitudes toward women’s roles: Predicting gender role traditionalism among college students. Sex Roles28: 131–142.
8.
ChapkisW (1986). Beauty Secrets: Women and the Politics of Appearance. Boston. South End Press.
9.
ChoiPToerienMWilkinsonS (2005). Body hair removal: The ‘mundane’ production of normative femininity. Sex Roles52(5–6): 399–406.
10.
CoppMKleinmanS (2008). Practicing what we teach: Feminist strategies for teaching about sexism. Feminist Teacher18: 101–124.
11.
CraigML (2002). Ain’t I a Beauty Queen? Black Women, Beauty, and the Politics of Race. New York. Oxford University Press.
12.
DixonAFHalliwellGEastRWignarajahPAndersonMJ (2003). Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women. Archives of Sexual Behavior32: 29–39.
13.
EnnsCSinacoreA (2005). Teaching and Social Justice: Integrating Multicultural and Feminist Theories in the Classroom. Washington, DC. American Psychological Association.
14.
Fahs B (forthcoming) Shaving it all off: Examining social norms of body hair among college men in a women’s studies course. Women’s Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal.
15.
FahsB (2011). Dreaded ‘otherness’: Heternormative patrolling in women’s body hair rebellions. Gender & Society25(4): 451–472.
16.
FiliaultSMDrummondJN (2007). The hegemonic aesthetic. Gay & Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review3(3): 175–184.
17.
FahsBDelgadoD(2011). The specter of excess: Race, class, and gender in women’s body hair narratives. In: BobelCKwanS (ed.) Embodied Resistance: Breaking the Rules, Challenging the Norms. Nashville, TN. Vanderbilt University Press, pp. 13–25.
18.
FoucaultM (1978). The History of Sexuality, Volume 1. New York. Vintage.
19.
GoldenC (2002). Consciousness-raising revisited: From living room to classroom. Psychology of Women Quarterly26(3): 262–265.
20.
HarrisKLMelaasKRodackerE (1999). The impact of women’s studies courses on college students of the 1990s. Sex Roles40: 969–977.
21.
HartungB (1990). Selective rejection: How students perceive women’s studies teachers. NWSA Journal2: 254–263.
22.
Henderson-KingDStewartAJ (1999). Educational experiences and shifts in group consciousness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin25: 390–399.
23.
HerbenickDSchickVReeceMSandersSFortenberryD (2010). Pubic hair removal among women in the United States: Prevalence, methods, and characteristics. The Journal of Sexual Medicine7(10): 3322–3330.
24.
HopeC (1982). Caucasian female body hair and American culture. The Journal of American Culture5(1): 93–99.
25.
KenwayJModraH(1992). Feminist pedagogy and emancipatory possibilities. In: LukeCGoreJ (eds) Feminisms and Critical Pedagogy. New York. Routledge, pp. 138–167.
26.
KenyonSTiggemannM (1998). The hairlessness norm: The removal of body hair in women. Sex Roles39(11–12): 873–885.
27.
KitzingerC(1995). Social constructionism: Implications for lesbian and gay psychology. In: D’AugelliARPattersonCJ (eds) Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identities Over the Lifespan: Psychological Perspectives. New York. Oxford University Press, pp. 136–160.
28.
LewisCTiggemannM (2004). Attitudes toward women’s body hair: Relationship with disgust sensitivity. Psychology of Women Quarterly28: 381–387.
29.
MaherF (1999). Progressive education and feminist pedagogies: Issues in gender, power, and authority. Teachers College Record101(1): 35–59.
30.
MartinsYTiggemannMChurchettL (2008). The shape of things to come: Gay men’s satisfaction with specific body parts. Psychology of Men and Masculinity9: 248–256.
31.
SowardsSKRenegarVR (2004). The rhetorical functions of consciousness-raising in third wave feminism. Communication Studies55(4): 535–553.
32.
StakeJE (2007). Predictors of change in feminist activism through women’s and gender studies classes. Sex Roles57: 43–54.
33.
StakeJHoffmannF (2000). Putting feminist pedagogy to the test: The experience of women’s studies from student and teacher perspectives. Psychology of Women Quarterly24: 30–38.
34.
StakeJERoadesLRoseSEllisLWestC (1994). The women’s studies experience: Impetus for feminist activism. Psychology of Women Quarterly18(1): 17–24.
35.
SynnottA (1987). Shame and glory: A sociology of hair. The British Journal of Sociology38(3): 381–413.
36.
ThomsenCJBasuAMReinitzMT (1995). Effects of women’s studies courses on gender-related attitudes of women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly19: 419–426.
37.
TiggemannMHodgsonS (2008). The hairless norm extended: Reasons for and predictors of women’s body hair removal at different body sites. Sex Roles59: 889–897.
38.
TiggemannMKenyonSJ (1998). The hairlessness norm: The removal of body hair in women. Sex Roles39: 873–885.
39.
TiggemannMLewisC (2004). Attitudes toward women’s body hair: Relationship with disgust sensitivity. Psychology of Women Quarterly28(4): 381–387.
40.
TiggemannMMartinsYChurchettL (2008). Beyond muscles: Unexplored parts of men’s body image. Journal of Health Psychology13: 1163–1172.
41.
ToerienMWilkinsonS (2003). Gender and body hair: Constructing the feminine woman. Women’s Studies International Forum26(4): 333–344.
42.
ToerienMWilkinsonS (2004). Exploring the depilation norm: A qualitative questionnaire study of women’s body hair removal. Qualitative Research in Psychology1(1): 69–92.
43.
ToerienMWilkinsonSChoiPYL (2005). Body hair removal: The ‘mundane’ production of normative femininity. Sex Roles52: 399–406.
44.
TretheweyA (2004). Sexuality, eros, and pedagogy: Desiring laughter in the classroom. Women & Language27(1): 34–40.
45.
WebberM (2005). ‘Don’t be so feminist’: Exploring student resistance to feminist approaches in a Canadian university. Women’s Studies International Forum28: 181–194.
