Should we view nuns as oppressed or agentic? A woman’s identity is constructed on multiple sites, but the identity of the nun is primarily constructed by the patriarchal institution of the Catholic Church, which ascribes meaning to and regulates her life. This article examines the Catholic Church’s dominant discursive construction of the nun as self-sacrificing woman. It draws on a study that applied feminist and Foucauldian analysis, first, to key Church texts relating to nuns’lives and, second, to interview data of 43 Australian/New Zealand nuns, exploring ways in which nuns in this sample negotiate the Church’s dominant discursive constructions of the nun in their lived experience as nuns. Subject to male institutional authority, nuns are represented by the Church as living lives of self-sacrifice, devoting themselves wholeheartedly and single-mindedly to God and to the Church’s work. Nuns in this study’s sample actively resist such representations, exercising personal agency in making decisions about their own lives, and in living alone rather than communally. In doing so, they represent themselves as agentic rather than oppressed women.
Abbo JA and Hannan JD ( 1952) The Sacred Canons: A Concise Presentation of the Current Disciplinary Norms of the Church, Vol. 1, trans. J.D. Hannan (rev. ed.). St. Louis, MO: B. Herder.
2.
Abbott WM ( 1966) The Documents of Vatican II/Introductions and Commentaries by Catholic Bishops and Experts; Responses by Protestant and Orthodox Scholars , general ed. Walter M. Abbott, trans. ed. Joseph Gallagher, trans. W.M. Abbott. London: Geoffery Chapman.
3.
Australian Catholic Bishops (1998) Statement of Conclusions. A Report of the Interdicasterial Meeting with a Representation of the Australian Bishops and the Roman Curia . Rome: The Catholic Church.
4.
Banister P., Burman E., Parker I., Taylor M. and Tindall C. ( 1994) Qualitative Methods in Psychology. Buckingham: Open University Press.
5.
Bartky SL ( 1997) Foucault, femininity and the modernization of patriarchal power. In: Conboy K, Medina N and Stanbury S (eds) Writing on the Body: Female Embodiment and Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 129-154.
6.
Brady JM ( 2005) Sisters of St Joseph: The Tasmanian Experience . The Foundation of the Sisters of St Joseph in Tasmania 1887-1937. Melbourne: Australian Catholic University.
7.
Briggs K. ( 2006) Double Crossed: Uncovering the Catholic Church’s Betrayal of American Nuns. New York: Doubleday.
8.
Burr V. ( 2003) Social Constructionism, (2nd ed.). Hove: Routledge.
9.
Butler J. ( 1997) Performative acts and gender constitution: an essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In: Conboy K, Medina N and Stanbury S (eds) Writing on the Body: Female Embodiment and Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 401-417.
10.
Butler J. ( 1999) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity . New York: Routledge .
11.
Campbell R. and Wasco SM ( 2000) Feminist approaches to social science: epistemological and methodological tenets. American Journal of Community Psychology28(6): 773-791.
12.
Catholic Church ( 1983) Codex Juris Canonici (English). London; Grand Rapids, MI.: Collins; Eerdmans.
13.
Catholic Church ( 1995) Catechism of the Catholic Church. New York: Doubleday.
14.
Chandler MC ( 2002) The sisters of divine love: role clarity and the juggling of multiple social identities, paper presented at the International Sociological Association, July 2002, Brisbane, Australia.
15.
Chibnall JT, Wolf A. and Duckro PN ( 1998) A national survey of the sexual trauma experiences of catholic nuns. Review of Religious Research40(2): 142-167.
16.
Chouliaraki L. ( 2002) The contingency of universality: some thoughts on discourse and realism. Social Semiotics12(1): 83-114.
17.
Christ C. ( 1979) Womanspirit Rising: A Feminist Reader in Religion . New York: HarperCollins Publishers .
18.
Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life (CICLS AL) (2002) Starting Afresh from Christ: A Renewed Commitment to Consecrated Life in the Third Millennium. Sydney: St Pauls Publications .
19.
Danaher G., Schirato T. and Webb J. ( 2000) Understanding Foucault. Sydney : Allen & Unwin.
20.
Davies B., Browne J., Gannon S., Hopkins L., Mccann H. and Whihlborg M. ( 2006) Constituting the feminist subject in poststructuralist discourse. Feminism & Psychology16(1): 87-103.
21.
Flynn DJ ( 1993) Dead end or crossroads? the midlife stories of four roman catholic 16 feminism & psychology 20(2) sisters. Dissertation Abstracts International54(2-A): 473-474.
22.
Foucault M. ( 1979) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison . New York: Vintage.
23.
Gafford JS ( 2001) Variations in psychological functioning among roman catholic religious professionals. Dissertation Abstracts International62(1-B): 547.
24.
Gardiner PS ( 1994) An Extraordinary Australian: Mary MacKillop. Sydney: E.J. Dwyer.
25.
Gavey N. ( 1989) Feminist post structuralism and discourse analysis. Contributions to feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly13: 459-475.
26.
Gergen KJ ( 1999) An Invitation to Social Construction. London: Sage.
27.
Gonsalves, H.J. ( 1996) The experience of catholic religious women following the organizational changes of vatican council II, dissertation, Massachusetts School of Professional Psychology, USA.
28.
Gross RM ( 2003) What went wrong? feminism and freedom from the prison of gender roles. Cross Currents53(1): 8-20.
29.
Grosz E. ( 1995) Space, Time and Perversion. New York : Routledge.
30.
Guide and Manual of Prayer for the Sodality of the Children of Mary ( 1941) Sydney: E.J. Dwyer.
31.
Handal PJ, Rankin C. and Gilner FH ( 2004) Emmaus community: efficacy of a treatment program for women religious. Journal of Psychology and Theology32(4): 335-44.
32.
Heron B. ( 2005) Self-reflection in critical social work practice: subjectivity and the possibilities of resistance. Reflective Practice6(3): 341-351.
33.
Heyward C. ( 1982) The Redemption of God: A Theology of Mutual Relation . Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
34.
Hughes LP ( 2004) To Labour Seriously: Catholic Sisters and Social Welfare in Late Nineteenth Century Sydney. Sydney: University of New South Wales.
35.
Isherwood L. ( 2007) The Fat Jesus: Feminist Explorations in Boundaries and Transgressions. London: Darton, Longman and Todd.
36.
Jantzen GM ( 1998) Becoming Divine. Towards a Feminist Philosophy of Religion . Manchester: Manchester University Press.
37.
Jones KB ( 1988) On Authority: Or, Why Women Are Not Entitled to Speak . In: Diamond I and Quinby L (eds) Feminism & Foucault. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press , 119-134.
38.
Kenel ME ( 1999) Convent stress revisited. Human Development20(1): 40-41.
39.
Kidder AS ( 2003) Women, Celibacy and the Church, (1stedition). New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company.
40.
Kloos B. and Moore T. ( 2000) The prospect and purpose of locating community research and action in religious settings. Journal of Community Psychology28(2): 119-137.
41.
Lerner G. ( 1993) The Creation of Feminist Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
Leung B. and Wittberg P. ( 2004) Catholic orders of women in china: adaptation and power . Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion43(1): 67-82.
43.
Marvasti AB ( 2004) Qualitative Research in Sociology: An Introduction . London: Thousand Oaks.
44.
McLean, V. ( 2003) Numbers of nuns drops in US, USA Today , 6 May, p. 1.
45.
McMinn MR ( 2003) Psychology and the church. Journal of Psychology and Christianity22(4): 291-292.
46.
Meiring TE ( 1985) Stress among women religious. Dissertation Abstracts International46(6-A): 1522.
47.
Mills AJ and Ryan C. ( 2001) Contesting the spiritual space: patriarchy, nureaucracy, and the gendering of women’s religious orders. Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science1(4): 60-79.
48.
Mitchell J and Rose J (eds) (1982) Feminine Sexuality. Jacques Lacan and the ecole freudienne. Hampshire : Macmillan Academic and Professional.
49.
Neto F. and Barros J. ( 2003) Predictors of loneliness among students and nuns in angolia and portugal. Journal of Psychology137(4): 351-362.
50.
O’Brien A. ( 2005) God’s Willing Workers: Women and Religion in Australia . Sydney: University of New South Wales Press Ltd.
51.
O’Grady H. ( 2005) Woman’s Relationship with Herself. East Sussex: Routledge.
52.
O’Sullivan MMK ( 1995) ‘A Cause of Trouble’? Irish Nuns and English Clerics. Sydney: Crossing Press .
53.
Parker I. ( 1994) Discourse analysis. In: Banister P, Burman E, Parker I, Taylor M and Tindall C (eds) Qualitative Methods in Psychology: A Research Guide. Buckingham: Open University Press, 92-107.
54.
Pears A. ( 2004) Feminist Christian Encounters: The Methods and Strategies of Feminist Informed Christian Theologies. Aldershot: Ashgate.
55.
Pillow WS ( 2003) Confession, catharsis, or cure? rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. Qualitative Studies in Education16(2): 175-196.
56.
Pope John Paul II ( 1996) Vita Consecrata: On the Consecrated Life and its Mission in the Church and in the World. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
57.
Pope John Paul II ( 2004) Address to the Australian Bishops on their Ad Limina Visit . Rome: The Catholic Church .
58.
Ronan M. ( 2007) Ethical challenges confronting the roman cathoic women’s ordination movement in the twenty-first century. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion23(2): 149-169.
59.
Rose N. ( 2000) Inventing our selves: psychology, power and personhood . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Sawicki J. ( 1991) Disciplining foucault: feminism, power and the body. New York: Routledge.
61.
Schaberg J. ( 2006) The Illegitimacy of Jesus: A Feminist Theological Interpretation of the Infancy Narratives. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.
62.
Schüssler Fiorenza E. ( 1983) In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins. New York: Crossroads.
63.
Slee N. ( 2003) Women’s Faith Development: Patterns and Processes . Aldershot: Ashgate.
64.
Snowdon D. ( 2001) Aging with Grace: What the Nun Study Teaches us about Leading Longer, Healthier and More Meaningful Lives. New York: Bantam Books.
65.
Solberg MM ( 1997) Compelling Knowledge. A Feminist Proposal for an Epistemology of the Cross. New York: SUNY Press .
66.
Tracy SJ ( 2005) Fracturing the real-self<->fake-self dichotomy: moving toward ‘crystallized’ organizational discourses and identities . Communication Theory15(2): 168-195.
67.
Walsh M. ( 2001) The Good Sams: Sisters of the Good Samaritan 1857-1969 . Mulgrave: John Garratt Publishing .
68.
Weedon C. ( 1997) Principles of Poststructuralism, (2nd ed). Oxford: Blackwell .
69.
Wittberg P. ( 1993) Residence stability and decline in roman catholic religious orders of women: a preliminary investigation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion32(1): 76-82.
