Review: Victoria Clarke and Elizabeth Peel (eds): Out in Psychology: Lesbian,Gay,Bisexual,Trans and Queer Perspectives. Chichester: Wiley,2007,496 pp. £105.00/E157.50/US$200.00,ISBN 9780470012871 (hbk)

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Billig, M. (1999) `Whose Terms? Whose Ordinariness? Rhetoric and Ideology in Conversation Analysis', Discourse & Society 10(4): 543-82.

Coyle, A. and Kitzinger, C. (eds) (2002) Lesbian and Gay Psychology: New Perspectives. Oxford: BPS/ Blackwell.

Hammersley, M. (2003) `Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: Methods or Paradigms? Discourse & Society 14(6): 751-81.

Kessler, S.J. and McKenna, W. (1978) Gender: An Ethnomethodological Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kitzinger, C. (1987) The Social Construction of Lesbianism. London: Sage.

McDonald, G. (1981) `Misrepresentation, Liberalism, and Heterosexual Bias in Introductory Psychology Textbooks', Journal of Homosexuality 6(3): 45-59.

Parker, I. (1992) Discourse Dynamics: Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology. London: Routledge.

Parker, I. (ed.) (1999) Critical Textwork. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.

10.

Schegloff, E.A. (1997) `Whose Text? Whose Context?', Discourse & Society 8(2): 165-87.

11.

Simoni, J.M. (2000) `Confronting Heterosexism in the Teaching of Psychology' , in B. Greene and G. Croom (eds) Education, Research and Practice in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered Psychology: A Resource Manual, pp. 74-90. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

12.

Wetherell, M. (1998) `Positioning and Interpretative Repertoires: Conversation Analysis and Post-structuralism in Dialogue', Discourse & Society 9(3): 387-412.