Chrisler, J.C. and Johnston-Robledo, I. (2000) `Motherhood and Reproductive Issues', in M. Biaggio and M. Hersen (eds) Issues in the Psychology of Women, pp. 199—226. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
2.
Fine, M. (1992) Disruptive Voices: The Possibilities of Feminist Research. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
3.
Gill, R. (1998) `Dialogues and Differences: Writing, Reflexivity and the Crisis of Representation', in K. Henwood , C. Griffin and A. Phoenix (eds) Standpoints and Di ferences: Essays in the Practice of Feminist Psychology, pp. 18—44. London: Sage.
4.
Hare-Mustin, R.T. and Marecek, J. (1992) `Beyond Difference', in R.T. Hare-Mustin and J. Marecek (eds) Making a Di ference: Psychology and the Construction of Gender , pp. 184—201. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
Hyde, J.S. (2005) `The Gender Similarities Hypothesis', American Psychologist60: 581—92.
6.
Kitzinger, C. (1994) `Should Psychologists Study Sex Differences? Editor's Introduction, Sex Differences Research: Feminist Perspectives', Feminism and Psychology4: 501—6.
7.
Maccoby, E.E. and Jacklin, C.N. (1974) The Psychology of Sex Di ferences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
8.
Morawski, J.G. (1994) Practicing Feminisms, Reconstructing Psychology: Notes on a Liminal Science. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
9.
Morawski, J.G. (2005) `Reflexivity and the Psychologist', History of theHuman Sciences18: 77—105.
10.
Parlee, M.B. (1975) `Psychology', Signs1: 119—38.
11.
Parlee, M.B. (1978) `Psychological Aspects of Menstruation, Child-birth, andMenopause', in J. Sherman and F. Denmark (eds) Psychology of Women: Future Directions of Research. New York: Psychological Dimensions.
12.
Parlee, M.B. (1979) `Psychology and Women', Signs5: 121—33.
13.
Sherif, C.W. (1998[1979]) `Bias in Psychology', Feminism & Psychology8: 58—75. (Reprinted from J.A. Sherman and E.T. Beck [eds] [1979] The Prism of Sex: Essays in the Sociology of Knowledge, pp. 93—133. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.)
14.
Teo, T. ( 2005) The Critique of Psychology: From Kant to Postcolonial Theory. New York: Springer.
15.
Unger, R.K. (1979) `Toward a Redefinition of Sex and Gender', American Psychologist34: 1085—94.
16.
Unger, R.K. (1988) `Psychological, Feminist, and Personal Epistemology: Transcending Contradiction', in M. Gergen (ed.) Feminist Thought and the Structure of Knowledge, pp. 124—41. New York: New York University Press.
17.
Unger, R.K. (1990) `Imperfect Reflections of Reality: Psychology Constructs Gender and the Construction of Gender', in R. Hare-Mustin and J. Marecek (eds) Making a Di ference: Psychology and the Construction of Gender , pp. 102—49. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
Unger, R.K. (1998a) Resisting Gender: Twenty-five Years of Feminist Psychology. London: Sage.
19.
Unger, R.K. (1998b[1989]) `Sex, Gender, and Epistemology ', in R.K. Unger Resisting Gender: Twenty-five Years of Feminist Psychology, pp. 173—86. London: Sage. (Reprinted from M. Crawford and M. Gentry [eds] [1989] Gender and Thought, pp. 17—35. New York: Springer-Verlag.)
20.
Unger, R.K. (1998c[1983]) `Through the Looking Glass: No Wonderland Yet! (The Reciprocal Relationship between Methodology and Models of Reality)', in R.K. Unger Resisting Gender: Twenty-five Years of Feminist Psychology, pp. 126—43. London: Sage. (Reprinted from Psychology of Women Quarterly1983 [8]: 9—32.)
21.
Weisstein, N. (1971 [1968]) `Psychology Constructs the Female', Journal of Social Education35: 362—73.
22.
Wilkinson, S. (1988) `The Role of Reflexivity in Feminist Psychology ', Women's Studies International Forum11(5): 493—502.