This article examines the parallels between the Canadian midwifery model of care and
feminist reconfigurations of autonomy and choice. A critical survey of the medical
model of informed consent and traditional notions of autonomy brings to light
shortcomings of bioethical theories and decision-making practices that maintain a
narrow ideology of autonomy and a limited perception of human characteristics. In
contrast, relational models emphasize the social situatedness of the individual, and
the relationship between self-trust and autonomous decision making. Shifting beyond
the consent paradigm of the medical model, the midwifery model of care and the
process of informed choice demonstrate an applied form of relational autonomy. It is
my contention that Canadian midwifery’s avowed emphasis on empowerment and
informed choice offers an exemplary standard of practice that maximizes
women’s reproductive autonomy, thus demonstrating the merits of
integrating relational approaches within bioethical theory and the health care
context at large.
Adler, C.
(1996)
‘Unheard and Unseen: Rural Women and Domestic Violence’
, Journal of Nurse-Midwifery41(6):
463-466
.
2.
Bourgeault, I. L.
(2000)
‘Delivering the “New” Canadian Midwifery: The
Impact on Midwifery of Integration into the Ontario Health Care System’
, Sociology of Health and Illness22(2):
172-177
.
3.
Briggs, C.
and
Mantini-Briggs, C.
(2003) Stories in the Time of Cholera - Racial Profiling
During a Medical Nightmare.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
.
4.
Burtch, B.
(1994) Trials of Labour: The Re-emergence of Midwifery.
Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press
.
5.
Campbell, J.
and
Campbell, D.
(1996)
‘Cultural Competence in the Care of Abused Women’
, Journal of Nurse-Midwifery41(6):
457-462
.
6.
Casper, M.
and
Berg, M.
(1995)
‘Constructivist Perspectives on Medical Work: Medical Practices
and Science and Technology Studies’
, Science, Technology, and Human Values20(4):
395-407
.
7.
College of Midwives of British Columbia
(2006) ‘Model of Midwifery
Practice’, accessed 5 October 2006. Available: http://www.cmbc.bc.ca
8.
Davis-Floyd, R.
(1992) Birth as an American Rite of Passage.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
.
9.
De Koninck, M.
,
Blais, R.
,
Joubert, P.
,
Gagnon, C.
and
L’Equipe d’evaluation des projetspiloted sages-femmes
(2001)
‘Comparing Women’s Assessment of Midwifery and Medical
Care in Quebec, Canada’
, Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health46(2):
60-67
.
10.
Diprose, R.
(1994) The Bodies of Women: Ethics, Embodiment and Sexual
Difference.
New York: Routledge
.
11.
Dodds, S.
(2000) ‘Choice and Control in Feminist
Bioethics’, in
C. Mackenzie
and
N. Stoljar
(eds) Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency,
and the Social Self, pp. 213-235.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
12.
Donchin, A.
(2001)
‘Understanding Autonomy Relationally: Toward a Reconfiguration of
Bioethical Principles’
, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy26(4):
365-386
.
13.
Draper, H.
(1996) ‘Consent in
Childbirth’, in
L. Frith
(ed.) Ethics and Midwifery: Issues in Contemporary Practice, pp.
17-35.
Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann
.
14.
Dresser, R.
(1996) ‘What Bioethics Can Learn from the
Women’s Health Movement’, in
S. Wolf
(ed.) Feminism and Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
15.
Duden, B.
(1993) Disembodying Women: Perspectives on Pregnancy and the
Unborn.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
16.
Espinosa, L.
and
Osborne, K.
(2002)
‘Domestic Violence During Pregnancy: Implications for Practice’
, Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health47(5):
305-317
.
17.
Harvey, S.
,
Rach, D.
,
Stainton, M.
,
Jarrell, J.
and
Brant, R.
(2002)
‘Evaluation of Satisfaction with Midwifery Care’
, Midwifery18:
260-270
.
18.
Health Canada.
(1999) A Handbook for Health and Social Service Professionals
Responding to Abuse During Pregnancy, prepared by Jamieson, Beals, Lalonde
and Associates,
Ottawa: National Clearinghouse on Family Violence
.
19.
Hunt, S.
and
Martin, A.
(2001) Pregnant Women: Violent Men - What Midwives Need to
Know.
Oxford: Books for Midwives
.
20.
Kennedy, H.
,
Shannon, M.
,
Chuahorm, U.
and
Kravetz, M.
(2004)
‘The Landscape of Caring For Women: A Narrative Study of
Midwifery Practice’
, Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health49(1):
14-23
.
21.
King, M. C.
and
Ryan, J.
(1996)
‘Woman Abuse: The Role of Nurse-Midwives in Assessment’
, Journal of Nurse-Midwifery41(6):
436-441
.
22.
MacDonald, M.
(2001)
‘Postmodern Negotiations with Medical Technology: The Role of
Midwifery Clients in the New Midwifery in Canada’
, Medical Anthropology20(2-3):
245-276
.
23.
McLeod, C.
(2002) Self-trust and Reproductive Autonomy.
Cambridge MA: MIT. Press
.
24.
McLeod, C.
and
Sherwin, S.
(2000) ‘Relational Autonomy, Self-trust and
Health Care for Patients Who Are Oppressed’, in
C. Mackenzie
and
N. Stoljar
(eds) Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency,
and the Social Self, pp. 259-279.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
25.
Meyers, D. T.
(1989) Self, Society, and Personal Choice.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
26.
Murkoff, H.
,
Eisenburg, A.
and
Hathaway, S.
(2002) What to Expect When You’re Expecting.
New York: Workman Publishing Company
.
27.
Overall, C.
(1987) Ethics and Human Reproduction: A Feminist
Analysis.
Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman
.
28.
Page, L.
(2000)
‘Midwifery in Canada: A New Midwifery for the New World’
, International Midwifery13(6):
6-7
.
29.
Page, L.
(2003)
‘One-to-One Midwifery: Restoring the “With
Woman” Relationship in Midwifery’
, Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health48(2):
119-125
.
30.
Rapp, R.
(2000) Testing Women, Testing the Fetus - The Social Impact
of Amniocentesis in America.
New York: Routledge
.
31.
Rooks, J.
(1999)
‘The Midwifery Model of Care’
, Journal of Nurse-Midwifery44(4):
370-374
.
32.
Saxell, L.
(2000) ‘Risk: Theoretical or
Actual’, in
L. Page
(ed.) The New Midwifery, pp. 87-104.
Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone
.
33.
Schuman, A.
and
Marteau, T.
(1993)
‘Obstetricians’ and Midwives’ Contrasting
Perceptions of Pregnancy’
, Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology11:
115-118
.
34.
Sharpe, M.
(2001)
‘Exploring Legislated Ontario Midwifery: Texts, Ruling Relations
and Ideological Practices’
, Resources for Feminist Research28(3/4):
39-63
.
35.
Sherwin, S.
(1992) No Longer Patient: Feminist Ethics and Health
Care.
Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press
.
36.
Sherwin, S.
(1998) ‘A Relational Approach to Autonomy in
Health Care’, in The Feminist Health Care Ethics Research
Network, S. Sherwin (coordinator) The Politics of Women’s Health:
Exploring Agency and Autonomy, pp. 19-47.
Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press
.
37.
Thorstensen, K.
(2000)
‘Trusting Women: Essential to Midwifery’
, Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health45(5):
405-407
.
38.
Tong, R.
(1997) Feminist Approaches to Bioethics - Theoretical
Reflections and Practical Applications.
Boulder, CO: Westview Press
.
39.
Towler, J.
and
Fairbain, G.
(1988) ‘Choice in
Childbirth’, in
G. Fairbain
and
S. Fairbain
(eds) Ethical Issues in Caring, pp. 87-106.
Aldershot: Avebury
.
40.
University of British Columbia
(n.d.) ‘Midwifery Program’, accessed 3 October
2006. Available: http://www.midwifery.ubc.ca/index.html
41.
Valerio, S.
(2001)
‘Informed Choice’
, Association of Ontario Midwives Journal7(2):
71-74
.
42.
Wendell, S.
(1996) The Rejected Body - Feminist Philosophical Reflections
on Disability.
New York: Routledge
.
43.
Westfall, R.
(2002)
‘The State of Midwifery in British Columbia, Canada’
, Midwifery Today - International MidwifeSummer:
51-55
.
44.
Wolf, S. M.
(ed.) (1996) Feminism and Bioethics: Beyond
Reproduction.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
