Braun, V.
(2000) ‘Heterosexism in Focus Group Research: Collusion and Challenge’, Feminism & Psychology10(1): 133-140.
2.
Clarke, V.
(2000) ‘Lesbian Mothers: Sameness and Difference’, Feminism & Psychology10(2): 273-278.
3.
Edwards, D.
, Ashmore, M. and Potter, J. (1995) ‘Death and Furniture: The Rhetoric, Politics and Theology of Bottom Line Arguments Against Relativism’, History of the Human Sciences8(2): 25-49.
4.
Frith, H.
(1998) ‘Constructing the “Other” Through Talk’, Feminism & Psychology8(4): 530-536.
5.
Gergen, K.J.
(1994) Realities and Relationships: Soundings in Social Construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Gergen, K.J.
(1998) ‘Constructionism and Realism: How Are We to Go On?’, pp. 147-155 in I. Parker (ed.) Social Constructionism: Discourse and Realism. London: Sage.
7.
Gill, R.
(1995) ‘Relativism, Reflexivity and Politics: Interrogating Discourse Analysis From a Feminist Perspective’, pp. 165-186 in S. Wilkinson and C. Kitzinger (eds) Feminism and Discourse: Psychological Perspectives. London: Sage.
8.
Gill, R.
(1998) ‘Dialogues and Differences: Writing, Reflexivity and the Crisis of Representation’, pp.18-44 in K. Henwood, C. Griffin and A. Phoenix (eds) Standpoints and Differences: Essays in the Practice of Feminist Psychology. London: Sage.
9.
Harré, R.
(1998) ‘Foreword’, pp. xi-xii in I. Parker (ed.) Social Constructionism, Discourse and Realism. London: Sage.
10.
Hepburn, A.
(2000) ‘On the Alleged Incompatibility Between Relativism and Feminist Psychology’, Feminism & Psychology10(1): 91-106.
11.
Kitzinger, C.
(1987) The Social Construction of Lesbianism. London: Sage.
12.
Kitzinger, C.
(1992) ‘The Individuated Self Concept: A Critical Analysis of Social-Constructionist Writing on Individualism’, pp. 221-250 in G. Breakwell (ed.) The Social Psychology of Identity and the Self Concept. London: Academic Press.
13.
Kitzinger, C.
(1995) ‘Social Constructionism: Implications for Lesbian and Gay Psychology’, pp. 136-161 in A.R. D’Augelli and C.J. Patterson (eds) Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identities Over the Lifespan: Psychological Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
Parker, I.
(1992) Discourse Dynamics: Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology. London: Routledge.
15.
Parker, I.
, ed. (1998) Social Constructionism, Discourse and Realism. London: Sage.
16.
Parker, I.
(1999a) ‘Against Relativism in Psychology, on Balance’, History of the Human Sciences12(4): 61-78.
17.
Parker, I.
(1999b) ‘The Quintessentially Academic Position’, History of the Human Sciences12(4): 89-91.
18.
Potter, J.
(1982) ‘“... Nothing so Practical as a Good Theory”: The Problematic Application of Social Psychology’, pp. 23-49 in P. Stringer (ed.) Confronting Social Issues: Some Applications of Social Psychology, Volume 1. London: Academic Press.
19.
Potter, J.
(1998) ‘Fragments in the Realization of Relativism’, pp. 27-45 in I. Parker (ed.) Social Constructionism, Discourse and Realism. London: Sage.
20.
Potter, J.
, Edwards, D. and Ashmore, M. (1999) ‘Regulating Criticism: Some Comments on an Argumentative Complex’, History of the Human Sciences12(4): 79-88.
21.
Potter, J.
and Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.
22.
Potter. J.
and Wetherell, M. (1995) ‘Natural Order: Why Social Psychologists Should Study (a Constructed Version of) Natural Language, and Why They Have Not Done So’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology14(1-2): 216-222.
23.
Shakespeare, T.
(1998) ‘Social Constructionism as a Political Strategy’, pp. 168-181 in I. Velody and R. Williams (eds) The Politics of Constructionism. London: Sage.
24.
Wetherell, M.
and Potter, J. (1992) Mapping the Language of Racism: Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
25.
Wetherell, M.
and Potter, J. (1998) ‘Discourse and Social Psychology - Silencing Binaries’, Theory and Psychology8(3): 377-388.
26.
Wilkinson, S.
and Kitzinger, C., eds (1995) Feminism and Discourse: Psychological Perspectives. London: Sage.
