Bleier, R.
(1984) Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and its Theories of Women. New York: Pergamon Press.
2.
Garfinkel, H.
(1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3.
Gergen, K.J.
(1985) ‘The Social Constructionist Movement in Modern Psychology’, American Psychologist40: 266-275.
4.
Herdt, G.
(1994) Third Sex, Third Gender: Beyond Sexual Dimorphism in Culture and History. New York: Zone Books.
5.
Hubbard, R.
(1996) ‘Gender and Genitals: Constructs of Sex and Gender’, pp. 168-179 in A. Ross (ed.) Science Wars. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
6.
ISNA
(1999) ‘Recommendations for Treatment: Intersex Infants and Children’, URL: http://www.ISNA.org/recommendations/
7.
Kessler, S.J.
and McKenna, W. (1978) Gender: An Ethnomethodological Approach. New York: John Wiley.
8.
McKenna, W.
and Kessler, S.J. (1997) ‘Comment on Hawkesworth’s “Confounding Gender”: Who Needs Gender Theory?’, Signs22: 687-691.
9.
Oyewumi, O.
(1998) ‘De-confounding Gender: Feminist Theorizing and Western Culture: A Comment on Hawkesworth’s “Confounding Gender”’, Signs23: 1049-1062.
10.
Tiefer, L.
(1995) Sex is not a Natural Act and Other Essays. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
