When the hamstring muscles are tight, the risk of injury during physical activity increases, prompting the frequent use of active interventions, such as stretching, in clinical settings. However, most previous proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching studies have been conducted at the end-range of motion, which does not correspond with the point of maximal force output according to the length–tension relationship. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of PNF stretching performed at the mid-range, where optimal force production is theoretically possible, with those performed at the end-range. Additionally, it aimed to investigate whether flexibility gains differed according to the degree of hamstring tightness.
Methods
Hamstring tightness was evaluated using the active knee extension (AKE) test. Participants were categorized into severe and mild tightness groups. PNF stretching was performed at either 100% of maximal range of motion (MaxROM) or 50% MaxROM. Flexibility changes were assessed post-intervention using the AKE test.
Results
In the severe hamstring tightness group, significant flexibility improvements were observed after PNF stretching at both 100% and 50% MaxROM. In contrast, the mild hamstring tightness group showed significant improvement only at 100% MaxROM.
Conclusions
The effectiveness of PNF stretching in increasing flexibility varies according to joint position (100% vs. 50% MaxROM) and the initial severity of tightness. Notably, individuals with severe tightness experienced significant gains even at mid-range, suggesting that mid-range PNF stretching may serve as a viable alternative for patients who experience discomfort or pain at maximal ranges.
NeumannDA. Kinesiology of the hip: a focus on muscular actions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2010; 40: 82–94.
2.
LimW. Changes in pain following the different intensity of the stretching and types of physical stress. Phys Ther Korea2019; 26: 63–69.
3.
AllamNMEbrahimHAMegahed IbrahimA, et al.The association of hamstring tightness with lumbar lordosis and trunk flexibility in healthy individuals: gender analysis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2023; 11: 1225973.
4.
Jandre ReisFJMacedoAR. Influence of hamstring tightness in pelvic, lumbar and trunk range of motion in low back pain and asymptomatic volunteers during forward bending. Asian Spine J2015; 9: 535–540.
5.
BehmDGAlizadehSDaneshjooA, et al.Acute effects of Various stretching techniques on range of motion: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med Open2023; 9: 107.
6.
LimW. Effect of PNF stretching performed in the AKE position on hip, knee, and ankle flexibility. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil2024; 37: 389–394.
7.
HillKJRobinsonKPCuchnaJW, et al.Immediate effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching programs compared with passive stretching programs for hamstring flexibility: a critically appraised topic. J Sport Rehabil2017; 26: 567–572.
8.
LempkeLWilkinsonRMurrayC, et al.The effectiveness of PNF versus static stretching on increasing hip-flexion range of motion. J Sport Rehabil2018; 27: 289–294.
9.
KonradAAlizadehSDaneshjooA, et al.Chronic effects of stretching on range of motion with consideration of potential moderating variables: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Sport Health Sci2024; 13: 186–194.
10.
ShrierIGossalK. Myths and truths of stretching: individualized recommendations for healthy muscles. Phys Sportsmed2000; 28: 57–63.
LimW. Effects of progressive increased intensity of PNF stretching on hamstring force and flexibility. Int J Hum Mov Sports Sci2020; 8: 186–192.
13.
LimW. Easy method for measuring stretching intensities in real clinical settings and effects of different stretching intensities on flexibility. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil2019; 32: 579–585.
14.
HindleKBWhitcombTJBriggsWO, et al.Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF): its mechanisms and effects on range of motion and muscular function. J Hum Kinet2012; 31: 105–113.
15.
MitchellUHMyrerJWHopkinsJT, et al.Neurophysiological reflex mechanisms’ lack of contribution to the success of PNF stretches. J Sport Rehabil2009; 18: 343–357.
16.
Dafda RenukaH. A study to compare efficacy of hold-relax and agonist contraction of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation technique on hamstring muscle flexibility in healthy female–an interventional study. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther2019; 13: 43–47.
17.
KnudsonDBennettKCornR, et al.Acute effects of stretching are not evident in the kinematics of the vertical jump. J Strength Cond Res2001; 15: 98–101.
18.
KnudsonDVNoffalGJBahamondeRE, et al.Stretching has no effect on tennis serve performance. J Strength Cond Res2004; 18: 654–656.
19.
ManoelMEHarris-LoveMODanoffJV, et al.Acute effects of static, dynamic, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on muscle power in women. J Strength Cond Res2008; 22: 1528–1534.
20.
YoungWEliasGPowerJ. Effects of static stretching volume and intensity on plantar flexor explosive force production and range of motion. J Sports Med Phys Fitness2006; 46: 403–411.
21.
AyalaFSainz de BarandaPDe Ste CroixM, et al.Comparison of active stretching technique in males with normal and limited hamstring flexibility. Phys Ther Sport2013; 14: 98–104.
22.
DontiOGaspariVPapiaK, et al.Acute effects of intermittent and continuous static stretching on hip flexion angle in athletes with varying flexibility training background. Sports (Basel)2020; 8: 28.
23.
YuSLinLLiangH, et al.Gender difference in effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on flexibility and stiffness of hamstring muscle. Front Physiol2022; 13: 918176.
24.
HansbergerBLLoutschRHancockC, et al.Evaluating the relationship between clinical assessments of apparent hamstring tightness: a correlational analysis. Int J Sports Phys Ther2019; 14: 253–263.
25.
HermosuraJLohmanEBartnik-OlsonB, et al.The usage of a modified straight-leg raise neurodynamic test and hamstring flexibility for diagnosis of non-specific low back pain: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One2024; 19: e0298257.
26.
BrughelliMCroninJ. Altering the length-tension relationship with eccentric exercise: implications for performance and injury. Sports Med2007; 37: 807–826.
27.
ter KeursHEIwazumiTPollackGH. The sarcomere length-tension relation in skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol1978; 72: 565–592.
28.
WorrellTWKarstGAdamczykD, et al.Influence of joint position on electromyographic and torque generation during maximal voluntary isometric contractions of the hamstrings and gluteus maximus muscles. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2001; 31: 730–740.
29.
LakieMCampbellKS. Muscle thixotropy-where are we now?J Appl Physiol (1985)2019; 126: 1790–1799.
30.
ProskeUTsayAAllenT. Muscle thixotropy as a tool in the study of proprioception. Exp Brain Res2014; 232: 3397–3412.
31.
ChalmersG. Re-examination of the possible role of Golgi tendon organ and muscle spindle reflexes in proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation muscle stretching. Sports Biomech2004; 3: 159–183.
32.
GregoryJEBrockettCLMorganDL, et al.Effect of eccentric muscle contractions on Golgi tendon organ responses to passive and active tension in the cat. J Physiol2002; 538: 209–218.
33.
KistemakerDAVan SoestAJKWongJD, et al.Control of position and movement is simplified by combined muscle spindle and Golgi tendon organ feedback. J Neurophysiol2013; 109: 1126–1139.
34.
FremereyRWLobenhofferPZeichenJ, et al.Proprioception after rehabilitation and reconstruction in knees with deficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament: a prospective, longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Br2000; 82: 801–806.
35.
HérouxMEAndermanINykvist VouisS, et al.History-dependence of muscle slack length in humans: effects of contraction intensity, stretch amplitude, and time. J Appl Physiol (1985)2020; 129: 957–966.
36.
Van HoorenBBoschF. Influence of muscle slack on high-intensity sport performance: a review. Strength & Conditioning Journal2016; 38: 75.
37.
SoucieJMWangCForsythA, et al.Range of motion measurements: reference values and a database for comparison studies. Haemophilia2011; 17: 500–507.
38.
YoudasJWKrauseDAHollmanJH, et al.The influence of gender and age on hamstring muscle length in healthy adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther2005; 35: 246–252.
39.
LimW. Sex differences in hamstring flexibility changes after specific warm-up. Physical Therapy Korea2023; 30: 275–280.
40.
HogeKMRyanEDCostaPB, et al.Gender differences in musculotendinous stiffness and range of motion after an acute bout of stretching. J Strength Cond Res2010; 24: 2618–2626.
41.
ParkSLimW. Comparison of muscle activity of hamstrings as knee flexors and hip extensors and effect of tibial and hip rotation on the contribution of hamstrings. J Bodyw Mov Ther2023; 34: 1–5.
42.
OhDLimW. Influence of submaximal isometric contractions of the hamstrings on electromyography activity and force while functioning as hip extensors. Isokinet Exerc Sci2021; 29: 291–298.
43.
LimW. Effects of hip rotation on the electromyographic activity of the medial and lateral hamstrings and muscle force. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil2021; 34: 1023–1029.
