Abstract
Background
This meta-analysis evaluated isokinetic strength profiles in soccer players, focusing on the hamstring-to-quadriceps (H/Q) ratio across three field positions.
Objective
To assess positional differences in isokinetic strength and hamstring-to-quadriceps (H/Q) ratios based on the categorization structure that permits comparative evaluation (DEF-MID-ATT).
Methods
Included were studies that reported quadriceps and hamstring peak torque and H/Q ratios at 60°/s and 180°/s. Three positional pairs were compared: (1) defenders vs. midfielders, (2) defenders vs. attackers, and (3) midfielders vs. attackers.
Results
Defenders maintained superior quadriceps and hamstring strength over both midfielders and attackers. They also maintained higher H/Q conventional and functional ratios than midfielders. Attackers displayed moderately stronger hamstrings than midfielders.
Conclusions
Defenders’ greater quadriceps and hamstring strength (particularly versus midfielders) likely reflects the mechanical demands associated with their field roles. These findings suggest that position-specific strength profiling may help guide training targets and reference values in soccer.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
